{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2019:101 - Luottamusmiehen valinta","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aS76ZNGfxI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-2019101-luottamusmiehen-valinta\/\">TT 2019:101 &#8212; Luottamusmiehen valinta<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-2019101-luottamusmiehen-valinta\/embed\/#?secret=aS76ZNGfxI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2019:101 &#8212; Luottamusmiehen valinta\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"aS76ZNGfxI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kokonaisuutena arvioiden ty\u00f6ehtosopimusm\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksen sanamuoto ei tukenut kantajan tulkintaa, jonka mukaan ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6ill\u00e4 olisi ollut halutessaan oikeus valita yksikk\u00f6kohtainen luottamusmies ilman erillist\u00e4 yrityskohtaista sopimista. Kanne hyl\u00e4ttiin. Asian ep\u00e4selvyyden vuoksi asianosaisilla oli perusteltua aihetta oikeudenk\u00e4yntiin, joten he saivat pit\u00e4\u00e4 oikeudenk\u00e4yntikulunsa vahinkonaan. KANTAJA Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvotteluj\u00e4rjest\u00f6 TSN ry VASTAAJA Hyvinvointiala HALI ry ASIA Luottamushenkil\u00f6t K\u00c4SITTELY TY\u00d6TUOMIOISTUIMESSA P\u00e4\u00e4k\u00e4sittely 24.9.2019..."}