{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/author\/hassankohen\/","title":"TT 2020:88 - Alkoholin maahantuonti","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bCqy7D9iTQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-202088-alkoholin-maahantuonti\/\">TT 2020:88 &#8212; Alkoholin maahantuonti<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-202088-alkoholin-maahantuonti\/embed\/#?secret=bCqy7D9iTQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2020:88 &#8212; Alkoholin maahantuonti\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"bCqy7D9iTQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kysymys siit\u00e4, oliko ty\u00f6nantaja menetellyt ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen vastaisesti kielt\u00e4ess\u00e4\u00e4n aluksella ty\u00f6skentelevilt\u00e4 merimiehilt\u00e4 alkoholin tuonnin alukselle. Tuomiossa katsottiin, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen sanamuodon mukaan merimiehill\u00e4 oli oikeus alkoholin ulosvientiin eli oikeus tuoda maahan alkoholia verovapaasti EU-maiden ulkopuolisessa liikenteess\u00e4. Ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa oli erikseen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty aluksen p\u00e4\u00e4llik\u00f6n oikeudesta asettaa alkoholin k\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00e4 ja hallussapitoa koskevia rajoituksia. N\u00e4ytt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4 oli j\u00e4\u00e4nyt, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen osapuolet olisivat..."}