{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2021:56 - Vanhentuminen","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Z7uaTLIAQa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-202156-vanhentuminen\/\">TT 2021:56 &#8212; Vanhentuminen<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-202156-vanhentuminen\/embed\/#?secret=Z7uaTLIAQa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2021:56 &#8212; Vanhentuminen\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"Z7uaTLIAQa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"V\u00e4lituomiolla ratkaistiin kysymys siit\u00e4, olivatko kanteessa vaaditut palkkasaatavat vanhentuneet. Kantaja ei ollut n\u00e4ytt\u00e4nyt, ett\u00e4 velan vanhentumista olisi katkaistu vanhentumislaissa tarkoitetulla tavalla. Kanteessa vaaditut saatavat katsottiin siten vanhentuneiksi ja niit\u00e4 koskevat suoritusvaatimukset hyl\u00e4ttiin. Kysymys my\u00f6s ty\u00f6tuomioistuimen toimivallasta. KANTAJA Teollisuusliitto ry VASTAAJAT Teknologiateollisuus ry X Oy ASIA Palkkaus ym. Vireille 1.7.2020 K\u00c4SITTELY TY\u00d6TUOMIOISTUIMESSA Suullinen valmistelu 11.3.2021 P\u00e4\u00e4k\u00e4sittely..."}