{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2021:89 - Korvaava ty\u00f6","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8yH6MskjBT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-202189-korvaava-tyo\/\">TT 2021:89 &#8212; Korvaava ty\u00f6<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-202189-korvaava-tyo\/embed\/#?secret=8yH6MskjBT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2021:89 &#8212; Korvaava ty\u00f6\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"8yH6MskjBT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Vuorottajana ter\u00e4sosaston tuotannon ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4teht\u00e4viss\u00e4 toiminut ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4 oli k\u00e4den ranteen leikkauksen j\u00e4lkeen katsottu soveltuvaksi sellaiseen ty\u00f6h\u00f6n, jossa ei aiheuteta k\u00e4delle isoja rasituksia. Riitaa oli siit\u00e4, oliko ty\u00f6nantaja menetellyt teknologiateollisuuden ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen korvaavaa ty\u00f6t\u00e4 koskevan m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksen vastaisesti osoittaessaan ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle senkkamiehen ty\u00f6h\u00f6n kuuluvia ty\u00f6teht\u00e4vi\u00e4. Senkkahuollossa ty\u00f6skenneltiin ty\u00f6parin kanssa. Tuomiosta tarkemmin ilmenevin perustein katsottiin ensinn\u00e4kin, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen korvaavaa ty\u00f6t\u00e4 koskeva..."}