{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2023:27 - J\u00e4rjestelyer\u00e4","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Rzfvb9lhJ3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-202327-jarjestelyera-2\/\">TT 2023:27 &#8212; J\u00e4rjestelyer\u00e4<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-202327-jarjestelyera-2\/embed\/#?secret=Rzfvb9lhJ3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2023:27 &#8212; J\u00e4rjestelyer\u00e4\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"Rzfvb9lhJ3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kysymys oli siit\u00e4, oliko ty\u00f6nantaja rikkonut ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen allekirjoitusp\u00f6yt\u00e4kirjassa olleita j\u00e4rjestelyer\u00e4\u00e4 koskevia m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksi\u00e4. Tuomiosta tarkemmin ilmenevill\u00e4 perusteilla ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6nantaja oli noudattanut j\u00e4rjestelyer\u00e4\u00e4 koskevia neuvottelum\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksi\u00e4. Henkil\u00f6st\u00f6n edustajien kanssa oli tosiasiallisesti k\u00e4yty keskustelua, ja heille oli annettu neuvotteluja varten riitt\u00e4v\u00e4t tiedot oikea-aikaisesti. Henkil\u00f6st\u00f6n edustajille annettua asiakirjaa j\u00e4rjestelyer\u00e4n kohdentamisesta oli pidett\u00e4v\u00e4 allekirjoitusp\u00f6yt\u00e4kirjan edellytt\u00e4m\u00e4n\u00e4 selvityksen\u00e4, vaikkei asiakirja kaikilta..."}