{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2023:39 - Asbesti","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"28FUaVvCKz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-202339-asbesti\/\">TT 2023:39 &#8212; Asbesti<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-202339-asbesti\/embed\/#?secret=28FUaVvCKz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2023:39 &#8212; Asbesti\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"28FUaVvCKz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin oli aiemmin tuomiossa TT 2021:32 katsonut, ett\u00e4 asbestista ja silt\u00e4 suojautumisesta aiheutuvaa haittaa oli pidett\u00e4v\u00e4 malmikaivosten ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa tarkoitettuna poikkeuksellisena haittana tai hankaluutena, jota ei ollut voitu ottaa huomioon ty\u00f6nvaativuutta m\u00e4\u00e4ritett\u00e4ess\u00e4. Mainitussa tuomiossa vahvistettiin, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6nantaja oli velvollinen maksamaan ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa tarkoitettua haittalis\u00e4\u00e4 jokaiselta sellaiselta ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n ty\u00f6skentelem\u00e4lt\u00e4 tunnilta, jona asbestista aiheutuvaa haittaa tai hankaluutta esiintyi. Nyt..."}