{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","title":"TT 2023:9 - Palkanmaksu","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"d09nyJHgg2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-20239-palkanmaksu\/\">TT 2023:9 &#8212; Palkanmaksu<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tt-20239-palkanmaksu\/embed\/#?secret=d09nyJHgg2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abTT 2023:9 &#8212; Palkanmaksu\u00bb &#8212; Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"d09nyJHgg2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kunta- ja hyvinvointialan ty\u00f6riidan ratkaisemiseksi oli sovittu erillissopimus. Sairaanhoitopiirin kuntayhtym\u00e4 laiminl\u00f6i maksaa er\u00e4\u00e4t erillissopimuksessa mainitut palkat viimeist\u00e4\u00e4n sopimuksessa sovittuna p\u00e4iv\u00e4n\u00e4. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi, ett\u00e4 n\u00e4in menetelless\u00e4\u00e4n kuntayhtym\u00e4n oli perustellusti pit\u00e4nyt tiet\u00e4\u00e4 rikkovansa erillissopimuksen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yst\u00e4. Asiassa ei ollut esitetty sellaisia erityisi\u00e4 syit\u00e4, joiden perusteella hyvityssakko olisi voitu j\u00e4tt\u00e4\u00e4 kokonaan tuomitsematta. Asiassa ei my\u00f6sk\u00e4\u00e4n ollut tullut esille seikkoja,..."}