{"id":565762,"date":"2026-04-15T07:15:25","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T05:15:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T07:15:25","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T05:15:25","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2059\/21.8T8LSB-A.L1.S1-B.L1 \u2013 2026-01-15"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: CRISTINA SOARES. I. O recurso de revis?o ? um recurso extraordin?rio, excecional, que significa a reabertura de um processo para sua reaprecia??o, perante a invoca??o de certas causas taxativamente indicadas na lei que viciam a decis?o transitada. II. Tendo o ac?rd?o recorrido apenas apreciado liminarmente, ao abrigo do disposto no n? 1 do art. 699? do CPC, se havia motivo para revis?o, e conclu?do que o recurso de revis?o n?o era admiss?vel ? luz do normativo invocado e dos documentos apresentados, n?o efetuou qualquer sindic?ncia sobre a decis?o revidenda. III. N?o ? de admitir liminarmente recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o, tendo como fundamento a al. c) do art. 696? do CPC, se os documentos apresentados (uma proposta de aquisi??o de uma fra??o e uma carta de uma institui??o financeira estrangeira a demonstrar disponibilidade para vir a conceder uma linha de cr?dito aos recorrentes) n?o s?o suficientes, por si s?, para impor um estado de facto diverso daquele em que a senten?a assentou, nomeadamente por carecerem de prova complementar, de verifica??o posterior, e dependente de terceiros.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: CRISTINA SOARES. I. O recurso de revis?o ? um recurso extraordin?rio, excecional, que significa a reabertura de um processo para sua reaprecia??o, perante a invoca??o de certas causas taxativamente indicadas na lei que viciam a decis?o transitada. II. Tendo o ac?rd?o recorrido apenas apreciado liminarmente, ao abrigo do disposto no n? 1 do art. 699? do CPC, se havia motivo para revis?o, e conclu?do que o recurso de revis?o n?o era admiss?vel ? luz do normativo invocado e dos documentos apresentados, n?o efetuou qualquer sindic?ncia sobre a decis?o revidenda. III. N?o ? de admitir liminarmente recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o, tendo como fundamento a al. c) do art. 696? do CPC, se os documentos apresentados (uma proposta de aquisi??o de uma fra??o e uma carta de uma institui??o financeira estrangeira a demonstrar disponibilidade para vir a conceder uma linha de cr?dito aos recorrentes) n?o s?o suficientes, por si s?, para impor um estado de facto diverso daquele em que a senten?a assentou, nomeadamente por carecerem de prova complementar, de verifica??o posterior, e dependente de terceiros.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8887],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-565762","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-6-seco","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2059\/21.8T8LSB-A.L1.S1-B.L1 \u2013 2026-01-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2059\/21.8T8LSB-A.L1.S1-B.L1 \u2013 2026-01-15\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: CRISTINA SOARES. I. O recurso de revis?o ? um recurso extraordin?rio, excecional, que significa a reabertura de um processo para sua reaprecia??o, perante a invoca??o de certas causas taxativamente indicadas na lei que viciam a decis?o transitada. II. Tendo o ac?rd?o recorrido apenas apreciado liminarmente, ao abrigo do disposto no n? 1 do art. 699? do CPC, se havia motivo para revis?o, e conclu?do que o recurso de revis?o n?o era admiss?vel ? luz do normativo invocado e dos documentos apresentados, n?o efetuou qualquer sindic?ncia sobre a decis?o revidenda. III. N?o ? de admitir liminarmente recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o, tendo como fundamento a al. c) do art. 696? do CPC, se os documentos apresentados (uma proposta de aquisi??o de uma fra??o e uma carta de uma institui??o financeira estrangeira a demonstrar disponibilidade para vir a conceder uma linha de cr?dito aos recorrentes) n?o s?o suficientes, por si s?, para impor um estado de facto diverso daquele em que a senten?a assentou, nomeadamente por carecerem de prova complementar, de verifica??o posterior, e dependente de terceiros.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2059\\\/21.8T8LSB-A.L1.S1-B.L1 \u2013 2026-01-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T05:15:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2059\\\/21.8T8LSB-A.L1.S1-B.L1 \u2013 2026-01-15\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2059\/21.8T8LSB-A.L1.S1-B.L1 \u2013 2026-01-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2059\/21.8T8LSB-A.L1.S1-B.L1 \u2013 2026-01-15","og_description":"Relator: CRISTINA SOARES. I. O recurso de revis?o ? um recurso extraordin?rio, excecional, que significa a reabertura de um processo para sua reaprecia??o, perante a invoca??o de certas causas taxativamente indicadas na lei que viciam a decis?o transitada. II. Tendo o ac?rd?o recorrido apenas apreciado liminarmente, ao abrigo do disposto no n? 1 do art. 699? do CPC, se havia motivo para revis?o, e conclu?do que o recurso de revis?o n?o era admiss?vel ? luz do normativo invocado e dos documentos apresentados, n?o efetuou qualquer sindic?ncia sobre a decis?o revidenda. III. N?o ? de admitir liminarmente recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o, tendo como fundamento a al. c) do art. 696? do CPC, se os documentos apresentados (uma proposta de aquisi??o de uma fra??o e uma carta de uma institui??o financeira estrangeira a demonstrar disponibilidade para vir a conceder uma linha de cr?dito aos recorrentes) n?o s?o suficientes, por si s?, para impor um estado de facto diverso daquele em que a senten?a assentou, nomeadamente por carecerem de prova complementar, de verifica??o posterior, e dependente de terceiros.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2059\/21.8T8LSB-A.L1.S1-B.L1 \u2013 2026-01-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-15T05:15:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2059-21-8t8lsb-a-l1-s1-b-l1-2026-01-15\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2059\/21.8T8LSB-A.L1.S1-B.L1 \u2013 2026-01-15"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/565762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=565762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=565762"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=565762"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=565762"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=565762"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=565762"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=565762"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=565762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}