{"id":567319,"date":"2026-04-15T10:49:24","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T08:49:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T10:49:24","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T08:49:24","slug":"bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/","title":{"rendered":"Bundesgerichtshof, 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss, 2025-12-18, I ZR 182\/22"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<h3>Tenor<\/h3>\n<div>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Der Tatbestandsberichtigungsantrag der Kl\u00e4gerin wird als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<h3>Gr\u00fcnde<\/h3>\n<div>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt>\n               <a name=\"rd_1\">1<\/a>\n            <\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Der Antrag ist mangels Statthaftigkeit unzul\u00e4ssig. Der Tatbestand eines Revisionsurteils unterliegt grunds\u00e4tzlich nicht der Tatbestandsberichtigung gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7\u00a0320 ZPO, weil die in ihm enthaltene verk\u00fcrzte Wiedergabe des Parteivorbringens keine urkundliche Beweiskraft besitzt (BGH, Beschluss vom 17.\u00a0Dezember 1998 &#8212;\u00a0V\u00a0ZR\u00a0224\/97, NJW 1999, 796 [juris Rn. 1]; Beschluss vom 30.\u00a0Oktober 2003 &#8212;\u00a0I\u00a0ZR\u00a0176\/01, GRUR 2004, 271 [juris Rn.\u00a02], jeweils mwN). Ein Ausnahmefall, in dem der Tatbestand des Revisionsurteils nach einer Zur\u00fcckverweisung f\u00fcr das weitere Verfahren urkundliche Beweiskraft nach \u00a7\u00a0314 ZPO entfaltet (dazu vgl. BGH, Beschluss vom 22.\u00a0Februar 1990 &#8212;\u00a0IX\u00a0ZR\u00a0257\/88, juris Rn.\u00a02), liegt nicht vor.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>\n                  <span>Koch<\/span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<span>L\u00f6ffler<\/span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<span>Schwonke<\/span>\n               <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<span>Feddersen<\/span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<span>Od\u00f6rfer<\/span>\n               <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\/jportal\/?quelle=jlink&#038;docid=jb-KORE700992026&#038;psml=bsjrsprod.psml&#038;max=true\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\/jportal\/portal\/page\/bsjrsprod.psml\/screen\/JWPDFScreen\/filename\/BGH_I_ZR_182-22_KORE700992026.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Rechtsprechung im Internet (BMJV\/BfJ) : les decisions sont mises a disposition gratuitement en HTML, PDF et XML pour libre utilisation et re-utilisation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tenor Der Tatbestandsberichtigungsantrag der Kl\u00e4gerin wird als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen. Gr\u00fcnde 1 Der Antrag ist mangels Statthaftigkeit unzul\u00e4ssig. Der Tatbestand eines Revisionsurteils unterliegt grunds\u00e4tzlich nicht der Tatbestandsberichtigung gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 320 ZPO, weil die in ihm enthaltene verk\u00fcrzte Wiedergabe des Parteivorbringens keine urkundliche Beweiskraft besitzt (BGH, Beschluss vom 17. Dezember 1998 &#8212; V ZR 224\/97, NJW 1999, 796 [juris Rn. 1]; Beschluss&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7802],"kji_court":[7803],"kji_chamber":[8404],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7808,7806,7809,7807],"kji_language":[7805],"class_list":["post-567319","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-allemagne","kji_court-bundesgerichtshof","kji_chamber-1-zivilsenat","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-beschluss","kji_keyword-bundesgerichtshof","kji_keyword-tenor","kji_keyword-zivilsenat","kji_language-allemand"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bundesgerichtshof, 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss, 2025-12-18, I ZR 182\/22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bundesgerichtshof, 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss, 2025-12-18, I ZR 182\/22\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tenor Der Tatbestandsberichtigungsantrag der Kl\u00e4gerin wird als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen. Gr\u00fcnde 1 Der Antrag ist mangels Statthaftigkeit unzul\u00e4ssig. Der Tatbestand eines Revisionsurteils unterliegt grunds\u00e4tzlich nicht der Tatbestandsberichtigung gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 320 ZPO, weil die in ihm enthaltene verk\u00fcrzte Wiedergabe des Parteivorbringens keine urkundliche Beweiskraft besitzt (BGH, Beschluss vom 17. Dezember 1998 - V ZR 224\/97, NJW 1999, 796 [juris Rn. 1]; Beschluss...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\\\/\",\"name\":\"Bundesgerichtshof, 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss, 2025-12-18, I ZR 182\\\/22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T08:49:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Bundesgerichtshof, 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss, 2025-12-18, I ZR 182\\\/22\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bundesgerichtshof, 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss, 2025-12-18, I ZR 182\/22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bundesgerichtshof, 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss, 2025-12-18, I ZR 182\/22","og_description":"Tenor Der Tatbestandsberichtigungsantrag der Kl\u00e4gerin wird als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen. Gr\u00fcnde 1 Der Antrag ist mangels Statthaftigkeit unzul\u00e4ssig. Der Tatbestand eines Revisionsurteils unterliegt grunds\u00e4tzlich nicht der Tatbestandsberichtigung gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 320 ZPO, weil die in ihm enthaltene verk\u00fcrzte Wiedergabe des Parteivorbringens keine urkundliche Beweiskraft besitzt (BGH, Beschluss vom 17. Dezember 1998 - V ZR 224\/97, NJW 1999, 796 [juris Rn. 1]; Beschluss...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/","name":"Bundesgerichtshof, 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss, 2025-12-18, I ZR 182\/22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-15T08:49:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-2025-12-18-i-zr-182-22\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Bundesgerichtshof, 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss, 2025-12-18, I ZR 182\/22"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/567319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=567319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=567319"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=567319"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=567319"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=567319"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=567319"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=567319"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=567319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}