{"id":568950,"date":"2026-04-15T14:33:29","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T12:33:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T14:33:29","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T12:33:29","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3894\/22.5T8ALM.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: JORGE LEAL. (art.? 663.? n.? 7 do CPC) I. O mecanismo processual previsto no art.? 670.? do CPC visa obstar a que a parte vencida num determinado recurso, reclama??o ou incidente tramitado em tribunal de recurso, se sirva de expedientes processuais para atrasar o subsequente desenrolar do processo, recorrendo ?quilo a que vulgarmente se apelida de ?chicana processual?. II. Tal mecanismo consiste na suspens?o da tramita??o do incidente dilat?rio, que ficar? a aguardar que, baixados os autos ?(s) inst?ncia(s), se mostrem pagas todas as quantias devidas pelo requerente do incidente, nos termos do art.? 670.? n.? 4 do CPC, considerando-se a decis?o impugnada transitada em julgado, para todos os efeitos. III. Considera-se manifestamente infundada, e desencadeadora da defesa contra demoras abusivas, a interposi??o de revista contra ac?rd?o do STJ que, em confer?ncia reunida nos termos do art.? 643.? do CPC, confirmou a n?o admiss?o do recurso de revista interposto contra ac?rd?o da Rela??o que n?o admitiu, por extemporaneidade, o recurso de apela??o interposto pela requerida\/recorrente contra senten?a que a condenara no ?mbito de processo especial de tutela da personalidade.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/09532d1f8392c0a080258d4e0041bfc0?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: JORGE LEAL. (art.? 663.? n.? 7 do CPC) I. O mecanismo processual previsto no art.? 670.? do CPC visa obstar a que a parte vencida num determinado recurso, reclama??o ou incidente tramitado em tribunal de recurso, se sirva de expedientes processuais para atrasar o subsequente desenrolar do processo, recorrendo ?quilo a que vulgarmente se apelida de ?chicana processual?. II. Tal mecanismo consiste na suspens?o da tramita??o do incidente dilat?rio, que ficar? a aguardar que, baixados os autos ?(s) inst?ncia(s), se mostrem pagas todas as quantias devidas pelo requerente do incidente, nos termos do art.? 670.? n.? 4 do CPC, considerando-se a decis?o impugnada transitada em julgado, para todos os efeitos. III. Considera-se manifestamente infundada, e desencadeadora da defesa contra demoras abusivas, a interposi??o de revista contra ac?rd?o do STJ que, em confer?ncia reunida nos termos do art.? 643.? do CPC, confirmou a n?o admiss?o do recurso de revista interposto contra ac?rd?o da Rela??o que n?o admitiu, por extemporaneidade, o recurso de apela??o interposto pela requerida\/recorrente contra senten?a que a condenara no ?mbito de processo especial de tutela da personalidade.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-568950","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3894\/22.5T8ALM.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3894\/22.5T8ALM.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE LEAL. (art.? 663.? n.? 7 do CPC) I. O mecanismo processual previsto no art.? 670.? do CPC visa obstar a que a parte vencida num determinado recurso, reclama??o ou incidente tramitado em tribunal de recurso, se sirva de expedientes processuais para atrasar o subsequente desenrolar do processo, recorrendo ?quilo a que vulgarmente se apelida de ?chicana processual?. II. Tal mecanismo consiste na suspens?o da tramita??o do incidente dilat?rio, que ficar? a aguardar que, baixados os autos ?(s) inst?ncia(s), se mostrem pagas todas as quantias devidas pelo requerente do incidente, nos termos do art.? 670.? n.? 4 do CPC, considerando-se a decis?o impugnada transitada em julgado, para todos os efeitos. III. Considera-se manifestamente infundada, e desencadeadora da defesa contra demoras abusivas, a interposi??o de revista contra ac?rd?o do STJ que, em confer?ncia reunida nos termos do art.? 643.? do CPC, confirmou a n?o admiss?o do recurso de revista interposto contra ac?rd?o da Rela??o que n?o admitiu, por extemporaneidade, o recurso de apela??o interposto pela requerida\/recorrente contra senten?a que a condenara no ?mbito de processo especial de tutela da personalidade.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3894\\\/22.5T8ALM.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T12:33:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3894\\\/22.5T8ALM.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3894\/22.5T8ALM.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3894\/22.5T8ALM.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25","og_description":"Relator: JORGE LEAL. (art.? 663.? n.? 7 do CPC) I. O mecanismo processual previsto no art.? 670.? do CPC visa obstar a que a parte vencida num determinado recurso, reclama??o ou incidente tramitado em tribunal de recurso, se sirva de expedientes processuais para atrasar o subsequente desenrolar do processo, recorrendo ?quilo a que vulgarmente se apelida de ?chicana processual?. II. Tal mecanismo consiste na suspens?o da tramita??o do incidente dilat?rio, que ficar? a aguardar que, baixados os autos ?(s) inst?ncia(s), se mostrem pagas todas as quantias devidas pelo requerente do incidente, nos termos do art.? 670.? n.? 4 do CPC, considerando-se a decis?o impugnada transitada em julgado, para todos os efeitos. III. Considera-se manifestamente infundada, e desencadeadora da defesa contra demoras abusivas, a interposi??o de revista contra ac?rd?o do STJ que, em confer?ncia reunida nos termos do art.? 643.? do CPC, confirmou a n?o admiss?o do recurso de revista interposto contra ac?rd?o da Rela??o que n?o admitiu, por extemporaneidade, o recurso de apela??o interposto pela requerida\/recorrente contra senten?a que a condenara no ?mbito de processo especial de tutela da personalidade.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3894\/22.5T8ALM.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-15T12:33:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3894-22-5t8alm-l1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3894\/22.5T8ALM.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/568950","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=568950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=568950"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=568950"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=568950"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=568950"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=568950"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=568950"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=568950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}