{"id":568951,"date":"2026-04-15T14:33:31","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T12:33:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T14:33:31","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T12:33:31","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 275\/20.9T8ESP-F.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: JORGE LEAL. (art.? 663.? n.? 7 do CPC) I. O tribunal n?o tem necessariamente de transcrever, nas suas decis?es, o teor de pe?as processuais, nomeadamente os requerimentos que tenha de apreciar. II. As transcri??es a que se proceda regem-se, t?o-s?, pelo crit?rio da conveni?ncia, temperado pela desej?vel simplicidade (art.? 131.? n.? 1 do CPC). O facto de um determinado requerimento das partes n?o ser reproduzido na decis?o que o aprecie n?o significa que ele n?o foi apreciado. III. O objeto da reclama??o regulada pelo art.? 643.? do CPC ? definido pelo requerimento que lhe d? in?cio. IV. A impugna??o, para a confer?ncia, da decis?o singular que julgue a reclama??o referida em III, deve ter por objeto a quest?o ou quest?es suscitadas nesse requerimento que lhe deu in?cio. V. A nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia n?o se confunde com a n?o aprecia??o de todos os argumentos ou raz?es apresentadas para o vencimento de uma pretens?o.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: JORGE LEAL. (art.? 663.? n.? 7 do CPC) I. O tribunal n?o tem necessariamente de transcrever, nas suas decis?es, o teor de pe?as processuais, nomeadamente os requerimentos que tenha de apreciar. II. As transcri??es a que se proceda regem-se, t?o-s?, pelo crit?rio da conveni?ncia, temperado pela desej?vel simplicidade (art.? 131.? n.? 1 do CPC). O facto de um determinado requerimento das partes n?o ser reproduzido na decis?o que o aprecie n?o significa que ele n?o foi apreciado. III. O objeto da reclama??o regulada pelo art.? 643.? do CPC ? definido pelo requerimento que lhe d? in?cio. IV. A impugna??o, para a confer?ncia, da decis?o singular que julgue a reclama??o referida em III, deve ter por objeto a quest?o ou quest?es suscitadas nesse requerimento que lhe deu in?cio. V. A nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia n?o se confunde com a n?o aprecia??o de todos os argumentos ou raz?es apresentadas para o vencimento de uma pretens?o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-568951","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 275\/20.9T8ESP-F.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 275\/20.9T8ESP-F.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE LEAL. (art.? 663.? n.? 7 do CPC) I. O tribunal n?o tem necessariamente de transcrever, nas suas decis?es, o teor de pe?as processuais, nomeadamente os requerimentos que tenha de apreciar. II. As transcri??es a que se proceda regem-se, t?o-s?, pelo crit?rio da conveni?ncia, temperado pela desej?vel simplicidade (art.? 131.? n.? 1 do CPC). O facto de um determinado requerimento das partes n?o ser reproduzido na decis?o que o aprecie n?o significa que ele n?o foi apreciado. III. O objeto da reclama??o regulada pelo art.? 643.? do CPC ? definido pelo requerimento que lhe d? in?cio. IV. A impugna??o, para a confer?ncia, da decis?o singular que julgue a reclama??o referida em III, deve ter por objeto a quest?o ou quest?es suscitadas nesse requerimento que lhe deu in?cio. V. A nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia n?o se confunde com a n?o aprecia??o de todos os argumentos ou raz?es apresentadas para o vencimento de uma pretens?o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 275\\\/20.9T8ESP-F.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T12:33:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 275\\\/20.9T8ESP-F.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 275\/20.9T8ESP-F.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 275\/20.9T8ESP-F.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25","og_description":"Relator: JORGE LEAL. (art.? 663.? n.? 7 do CPC) I. O tribunal n?o tem necessariamente de transcrever, nas suas decis?es, o teor de pe?as processuais, nomeadamente os requerimentos que tenha de apreciar. II. As transcri??es a que se proceda regem-se, t?o-s?, pelo crit?rio da conveni?ncia, temperado pela desej?vel simplicidade (art.? 131.? n.? 1 do CPC). O facto de um determinado requerimento das partes n?o ser reproduzido na decis?o que o aprecie n?o significa que ele n?o foi apreciado. III. O objeto da reclama??o regulada pelo art.? 643.? do CPC ? definido pelo requerimento que lhe d? in?cio. IV. A impugna??o, para a confer?ncia, da decis?o singular que julgue a reclama??o referida em III, deve ter por objeto a quest?o ou quest?es suscitadas nesse requerimento que lhe deu in?cio. V. A nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia n?o se confunde com a n?o aprecia??o de todos os argumentos ou raz?es apresentadas para o vencimento de uma pretens?o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 275\/20.9T8ESP-F.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-15T12:33:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-275-20-9t8esp-f-p1-a-s1-2025-11-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 275\/20.9T8ESP-F.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/568951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=568951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=568951"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=568951"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=568951"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=568951"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=568951"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=568951"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=568951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}