{"id":568953,"date":"2026-04-15T14:33:37","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T12:33:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T14:33:37","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T12:33:37","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 104\/24.4YRGMR.P1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: ANT?NIO DOMINGOS PIRES ROBALO. Sum?rio elaborado pelo relator nos termos do art.? 663.?, n.? 7, do CPC I.- Verifica-se a nulidade da senten?a\/ac?rd?o prevista na al.? d), do n.? 1, do art.? 615.?, do C.P.C., quando o tribunal n?o se pronuncie sobre quest?es que devesse apreciar ou conhe?a de quest?es de que n?o podia tomar conhecimento. II- Apenas se verifica quando o tribunal deixe de conhecer ?quest?es tem?ticas centrais? (isto ?, atinentes ao thema decidendum, que ? constitu?do pelo pedido ou pedidos, causa ou causas de pedir e exce??es) suscitadas pelos litigantes, ou de que se deva conhecer oficiosamente, cuja resolu??o n?o esteja prejudicada pela solu??o dada a outras, quest?es (a resolver) que n?o se confundem nem compreendem o dever de responder a todos os invocados argumentos, motivos ou raz?es jur?dicas, at? porque, como ? sabido, ?o juiz n?o est? sujeito ?s alega??es das partes no tocante ? indaga??o, interpreta??o e aplica??o das regras de direito III.- H? viola??o do poder jurisdicional quando um juiz ap?s a prola??o do ac?rd?o\/senten?a profere atos que a lei n?o permite (art.? 613.? do C.P.C.), o que se aplica ?s decis?es arbitrais.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/f5633e022887ca4580258d4e0040bccb?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: ANT?NIO DOMINGOS PIRES ROBALO. Sum?rio elaborado pelo relator nos termos do art.? 663.?, n.? 7, do CPC I.- Verifica-se a nulidade da senten?a\/ac?rd?o prevista na al.? d), do n.? 1, do art.? 615.?, do C.P.C., quando o tribunal n?o se pronuncie sobre quest?es que devesse apreciar ou conhe?a de quest?es de que n?o podia tomar conhecimento. II- Apenas se verifica quando o tribunal deixe de conhecer ?quest?es tem?ticas centrais? (isto ?, atinentes ao thema decidendum, que ? constitu?do pelo pedido ou pedidos, causa ou causas de pedir e exce??es) suscitadas pelos litigantes, ou de que se deva conhecer oficiosamente, cuja resolu??o n?o esteja prejudicada pela solu??o dada a outras, quest?es (a resolver) que n?o se confundem nem compreendem o dever de responder a todos os invocados argumentos, motivos ou raz?es jur?dicas, at? porque, como ? sabido, ?o juiz n?o est? sujeito ?s alega??es das partes no tocante ? indaga??o, interpreta??o e aplica??o das regras de direito III.- H? viola??o do poder jurisdicional quando um juiz ap?s a prola??o do ac?rd?o\/senten?a profere atos que a lei n?o permite (art.? 613.? do C.P.C.), o que se aplica ?s decis?es arbitrais.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-568953","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 104\/24.4YRGMR.P1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 104\/24.4YRGMR.P1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANT?NIO DOMINGOS PIRES ROBALO. Sum?rio elaborado pelo relator nos termos do art.? 663.?, n.? 7, do CPC I.- Verifica-se a nulidade da senten?a\/ac?rd?o prevista na al.? d), do n.? 1, do art.? 615.?, do C.P.C., quando o tribunal n?o se pronuncie sobre quest?es que devesse apreciar ou conhe?a de quest?es de que n?o podia tomar conhecimento. II- Apenas se verifica quando o tribunal deixe de conhecer ?quest?es tem?ticas centrais? (isto ?, atinentes ao thema decidendum, que ? constitu?do pelo pedido ou pedidos, causa ou causas de pedir e exce??es) suscitadas pelos litigantes, ou de que se deva conhecer oficiosamente, cuja resolu??o n?o esteja prejudicada pela solu??o dada a outras, quest?es (a resolver) que n?o se confundem nem compreendem o dever de responder a todos os invocados argumentos, motivos ou raz?es jur?dicas, at? porque, como ? sabido, ?o juiz n?o est? sujeito ?s alega??es das partes no tocante ? indaga??o, interpreta??o e aplica??o das regras de direito III.- H? viola??o do poder jurisdicional quando um juiz ap?s a prola??o do ac?rd?o\/senten?a profere atos que a lei n?o permite (art.? 613.? do C.P.C.), o que se aplica ?s decis?es arbitrais.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 104\\\/24.4YRGMR.P1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T12:33:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 104\\\/24.4YRGMR.P1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 104\/24.4YRGMR.P1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 104\/24.4YRGMR.P1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25","og_description":"Relator: ANT?NIO DOMINGOS PIRES ROBALO. Sum?rio elaborado pelo relator nos termos do art.? 663.?, n.? 7, do CPC I.- Verifica-se a nulidade da senten?a\/ac?rd?o prevista na al.? d), do n.? 1, do art.? 615.?, do C.P.C., quando o tribunal n?o se pronuncie sobre quest?es que devesse apreciar ou conhe?a de quest?es de que n?o podia tomar conhecimento. II- Apenas se verifica quando o tribunal deixe de conhecer ?quest?es tem?ticas centrais? (isto ?, atinentes ao thema decidendum, que ? constitu?do pelo pedido ou pedidos, causa ou causas de pedir e exce??es) suscitadas pelos litigantes, ou de que se deva conhecer oficiosamente, cuja resolu??o n?o esteja prejudicada pela solu??o dada a outras, quest?es (a resolver) que n?o se confundem nem compreendem o dever de responder a todos os invocados argumentos, motivos ou raz?es jur?dicas, at? porque, como ? sabido, ?o juiz n?o est? sujeito ?s alega??es das partes no tocante ? indaga??o, interpreta??o e aplica??o das regras de direito III.- H? viola??o do poder jurisdicional quando um juiz ap?s a prola??o do ac?rd?o\/senten?a profere atos que a lei n?o permite (art.? 613.? do C.P.C.), o que se aplica ?s decis?es arbitrais.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 104\/24.4YRGMR.P1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-15T12:33:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-104-24-4yrgmr-p1-s1-2025-11-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 104\/24.4YRGMR.P1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/568953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=568953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=568953"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=568953"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=568953"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=568953"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=568953"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=568953"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=568953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}