{"id":568962,"date":"2026-04-15T14:34:01","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T12:34:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T14:34:01","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T12:34:01","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6785\/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: MARIA DO ROS?RIO GON?ALVES. I. A imputa??o ao tribunal recorrido da viola??o do regime adjetivo previsto no art. 640.? do CPC, no tocante ? aprecia??o da impugna??o da decis?o da mat?ria de facto, descaracteriza a dupla conforme entre as decis?es das inst?ncias, por se inscrever no ?mbito do exerc?cio dos poderes conferidos ? Rela??o, n?o se verificando duas aprecia??es sucessivas de uma mesma quest?o de direito. II. Estando equacionado o modo como a Rela??o exerceu os poderes de aprecia??o da impugna??o da decis?o de facto, no ?mbito do artigo 640? do CPC., justifica-se a interven??o do STJ., ao abrigo do n?. 3 do art. 674? do mesmo diploma legal. III. Os recorrentes devem tomar posi??o espec?fica sobre os motivos da discord?ncia, indicando e explicitando de forma pormenorizada, individualizada e minuciosa os concretos pontos de facto que se pretendem impugnar, os concretos meios probat?rios que impunham decis?o diversa e a decis?o que entendam ser a correta, n?o sendo para o efeito suficiente uma gen?rica afirma??o dessa discord?ncia.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: MARIA DO ROS?RIO GON?ALVES. I. A imputa??o ao tribunal recorrido da viola??o do regime adjetivo previsto no art. 640.? do CPC, no tocante ? aprecia??o da impugna??o da decis?o da mat?ria de facto, descaracteriza a dupla conforme entre as decis?es das inst?ncias, por se inscrever no ?mbito do exerc?cio dos poderes conferidos ? Rela??o, n?o se verificando duas aprecia??es sucessivas de uma mesma quest?o de direito. II. Estando equacionado o modo como a Rela??o exerceu os poderes de aprecia??o da impugna??o da decis?o de facto, no ?mbito do artigo 640? do CPC., justifica-se a interven??o do STJ., ao abrigo do n?. 3 do art. 674? do mesmo diploma legal. III. Os recorrentes devem tomar posi??o espec?fica sobre os motivos da discord?ncia, indicando e explicitando de forma pormenorizada, individualizada e minuciosa os concretos pontos de facto que se pretendem impugnar, os concretos meios probat?rios que impunham decis?o diversa e a decis?o que entendam ser a correta, n?o sendo para o efeito suficiente uma gen?rica afirma??o dessa discord?ncia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8887],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-568962","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-6-seco","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6785\/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6785\/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MARIA DO ROS?RIO GON?ALVES. I. A imputa??o ao tribunal recorrido da viola??o do regime adjetivo previsto no art. 640.? do CPC, no tocante ? aprecia??o da impugna??o da decis?o da mat?ria de facto, descaracteriza a dupla conforme entre as decis?es das inst?ncias, por se inscrever no ?mbito do exerc?cio dos poderes conferidos ? Rela??o, n?o se verificando duas aprecia??es sucessivas de uma mesma quest?o de direito. II. Estando equacionado o modo como a Rela??o exerceu os poderes de aprecia??o da impugna??o da decis?o de facto, no ?mbito do artigo 640? do CPC., justifica-se a interven??o do STJ., ao abrigo do n?. 3 do art. 674? do mesmo diploma legal. III. Os recorrentes devem tomar posi??o espec?fica sobre os motivos da discord?ncia, indicando e explicitando de forma pormenorizada, individualizada e minuciosa os concretos pontos de facto que se pretendem impugnar, os concretos meios probat?rios que impunham decis?o diversa e a decis?o que entendam ser a correta, n?o sendo para o efeito suficiente uma gen?rica afirma??o dessa discord?ncia.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6785\\\/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T12:34:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6785\\\/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6785\/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6785\/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25","og_description":"Relator: MARIA DO ROS?RIO GON?ALVES. I. A imputa??o ao tribunal recorrido da viola??o do regime adjetivo previsto no art. 640.? do CPC, no tocante ? aprecia??o da impugna??o da decis?o da mat?ria de facto, descaracteriza a dupla conforme entre as decis?es das inst?ncias, por se inscrever no ?mbito do exerc?cio dos poderes conferidos ? Rela??o, n?o se verificando duas aprecia??es sucessivas de uma mesma quest?o de direito. II. Estando equacionado o modo como a Rela??o exerceu os poderes de aprecia??o da impugna??o da decis?o de facto, no ?mbito do artigo 640? do CPC., justifica-se a interven??o do STJ., ao abrigo do n?. 3 do art. 674? do mesmo diploma legal. III. Os recorrentes devem tomar posi??o espec?fica sobre os motivos da discord?ncia, indicando e explicitando de forma pormenorizada, individualizada e minuciosa os concretos pontos de facto que se pretendem impugnar, os concretos meios probat?rios que impunham decis?o diversa e a decis?o que entendam ser a correta, n?o sendo para o efeito suficiente uma gen?rica afirma??o dessa discord?ncia.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6785\/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-15T12:34:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6785-20-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2025-11-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6785\/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-11-25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/568962","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=568962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=568962"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=568962"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=568962"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=568962"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=568962"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=568962"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=568962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}