{"id":570081,"date":"2026-04-15T17:10:22","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T15:10:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T17:10:22","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T15:10:22","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1314\/24.0YLPRT.G1.S1 \u2013 2025-10-28"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: PIRES ROBALO. ( art.? 663.?, n.? 7, do CPC) I ? A autoridade do caso julgado implica o acatamento de uma decis?o proferida em ac??o anterior cujo objecto se inscreva, como pressuposto indiscut?vel, no objecto de uma ac??o posterior, ainda que n?o integralmente id?ntico, de modo a obstar a que a rela??o jur?dica ali definida venha a ser contemplada, de novo, de forma diversa. II &#8212; Embora, em regra, o caso julgado n?o se estenda aos fundamentos de facto e de direito, a for?a do caso julgado material abrange, para al?m das quest?es directamente decididas na parte dispositiva da senten?a, as que sejam antecedente l?gico necess?rio ? emiss?o da parte dispositiva do julgado. III ? Por?m, nos casos de improced?ncia do pedido do autor na ac??o transitada, s? a excep??o perempt?ria com que o r?u obstou ao vencimento daquele ? que ser? pass?vel de ser oposta noutra ac??o em que se discuta um pedido conexo. IV ? Se estiver vedado ao r?u reagir judicialmente contra uma decis?o final favor?vel e ver reapreciada a excep??o perempt?ria que foi julgada improcedente e que, portanto, n?o determinou a improced?ncia do pedido formulado pelo autor, n?o se verifica a autoridade de caso julgado.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/ec9dc6c91ebbd2f980258d4100541c8a?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: PIRES ROBALO. ( art.? 663.?, n.? 7, do CPC) I ? A autoridade do caso julgado implica o acatamento de uma decis?o proferida em ac??o anterior cujo objecto se inscreva, como pressuposto indiscut?vel, no objecto de uma ac??o posterior, ainda que n?o integralmente id?ntico, de modo a obstar a que a rela??o jur?dica ali definida venha a ser contemplada, de novo, de forma diversa. II &#8212; Embora, em regra, o caso julgado n?o se estenda aos fundamentos de facto e de direito, a for?a do caso julgado material abrange, para al?m das quest?es directamente decididas na parte dispositiva da senten?a, as que sejam antecedente l?gico necess?rio ? emiss?o da parte dispositiva do julgado. III ? Por?m, nos casos de improced?ncia do pedido do autor na ac??o transitada, s? a excep??o perempt?ria com que o r?u obstou ao vencimento daquele ? que ser? pass?vel de ser oposta noutra ac??o em que se discuta um pedido conexo. IV ? Se estiver vedado ao r?u reagir judicialmente contra uma decis?o final favor?vel e ver reapreciada a excep??o perempt?ria que foi julgada improcedente e que, portanto, n?o determinou a improced?ncia do pedido formulado pelo autor, n?o se verifica a autoridade de caso julgado.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-570081","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1314\/24.0YLPRT.G1.S1 \u2013 2025-10-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1314\/24.0YLPRT.G1.S1 \u2013 2025-10-28\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PIRES ROBALO. ( art.? 663.?, n.? 7, do CPC) I ? A autoridade do caso julgado implica o acatamento de uma decis?o proferida em ac??o anterior cujo objecto se inscreva, como pressuposto indiscut?vel, no objecto de uma ac??o posterior, ainda que n?o integralmente id?ntico, de modo a obstar a que a rela??o jur?dica ali definida venha a ser contemplada, de novo, de forma diversa. II - Embora, em regra, o caso julgado n?o se estenda aos fundamentos de facto e de direito, a for?a do caso julgado material abrange, para al?m das quest?es directamente decididas na parte dispositiva da senten?a, as que sejam antecedente l?gico necess?rio ? emiss?o da parte dispositiva do julgado. III ? Por?m, nos casos de improced?ncia do pedido do autor na ac??o transitada, s? a excep??o perempt?ria com que o r?u obstou ao vencimento daquele ? que ser? pass?vel de ser oposta noutra ac??o em que se discuta um pedido conexo. IV ? Se estiver vedado ao r?u reagir judicialmente contra uma decis?o final favor?vel e ver reapreciada a excep??o perempt?ria que foi julgada improcedente e que, portanto, n?o determinou a improced?ncia do pedido formulado pelo autor, n?o se verifica a autoridade de caso julgado.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1314\\\/24.0YLPRT.G1.S1 \u2013 2025-10-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T15:10:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1314\\\/24.0YLPRT.G1.S1 \u2013 2025-10-28\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1314\/24.0YLPRT.G1.S1 \u2013 2025-10-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1314\/24.0YLPRT.G1.S1 \u2013 2025-10-28","og_description":"Relator: PIRES ROBALO. ( art.? 663.?, n.? 7, do CPC) I ? A autoridade do caso julgado implica o acatamento de uma decis?o proferida em ac??o anterior cujo objecto se inscreva, como pressuposto indiscut?vel, no objecto de uma ac??o posterior, ainda que n?o integralmente id?ntico, de modo a obstar a que a rela??o jur?dica ali definida venha a ser contemplada, de novo, de forma diversa. II - Embora, em regra, o caso julgado n?o se estenda aos fundamentos de facto e de direito, a for?a do caso julgado material abrange, para al?m das quest?es directamente decididas na parte dispositiva da senten?a, as que sejam antecedente l?gico necess?rio ? emiss?o da parte dispositiva do julgado. III ? Por?m, nos casos de improced?ncia do pedido do autor na ac??o transitada, s? a excep??o perempt?ria com que o r?u obstou ao vencimento daquele ? que ser? pass?vel de ser oposta noutra ac??o em que se discuta um pedido conexo. IV ? Se estiver vedado ao r?u reagir judicialmente contra uma decis?o final favor?vel e ver reapreciada a excep??o perempt?ria que foi julgada improcedente e que, portanto, n?o determinou a improced?ncia do pedido formulado pelo autor, n?o se verifica a autoridade de caso julgado.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1314\/24.0YLPRT.G1.S1 \u2013 2025-10-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-15T15:10:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1314-24-0ylprt-g1-s1-2025-10-28\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1314\/24.0YLPRT.G1.S1 \u2013 2025-10-28"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/570081","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=570081"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=570081"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=570081"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=570081"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=570081"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=570081"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=570081"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=570081"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}