{"id":577155,"date":"2026-04-16T12:13:07","date_gmt":"2026-04-16T10:13:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/"},"modified":"2026-05-11T02:46:15","modified_gmt":"2026-05-11T00:46:15","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 23\/22.9PEEVR.E1.S1 \u2013 2025-04-30"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: JORGE RAPOSO. I. A organiza\u00e7\u00e3o, a dimens\u00e3o do neg\u00f3cio, a sua reitera\u00e7\u00e3o no tempo e os proventos obtidos afastam uma imagem global do facto correspondente a uma ilicitude diminu\u00edda e, pelo contr\u00e1rio, o facto de irem a Set\u00fabal adquirir estupefacientes acompanhados pelo filho menor acarreta j\u00e1 um grau de ilicitude acrescido (art. 24\u00ba al. i) do Decreto-Lei 15\/93). II. Ponderadas que foram as especificidades do caso e a margem de actua\u00e7\u00e3o insindic\u00e1vel da actividade judicial na determina\u00e7\u00e3o da medida da pena, a natureza altamente perniciosa das subst\u00e2ncias estupefacientes traficadas (hero\u00edna e coca\u00edna) a reincidentes (reincid\u00eancia homog\u00e9nea, hom\u00f3tropa ou espec\u00edfica), a pr\u00e1tica dos factos no per\u00edodo de liberdade condicional por crime de id\u00eantica natureza, a pena de 8 anos e 6 meses de pris\u00e3o n\u00e3o destoa da jurisprud\u00eancia deste Supremo Tribunal para casos semelhantes e mostra-se proporcional, adequada e necess\u00e1ria e conforme aos crit\u00e9rios plasmados no art. 71\u00ba do C\u00f3digo Penal. III. De acordo com jurisprud\u00eancia sedimentada deste Supremo, n\u00e3o \u00e9 admiss\u00edvel recurso para o Supremo Tribunal com os fundamentos previstos nos n\u00bas 2 e 3 do art. 410\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Penal e, bem assim, n\u00e3o \u00e9 admiss\u00edvel que o recorrente submeta inovatoriamente \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a a quest\u00e3o (dos v\u00edcios) que optou por n\u00e3o submeter \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do tribunal da rela\u00e7\u00e3o (art. 410\u00ba n\u00ba 1 do C\u00f3digo de Processo Penal); consequentemente, deve ser rejeitado o recurso na parte em que invoca contradi\u00e7\u00e3o insan\u00e1vel entre a fundamenta\u00e7\u00e3o e a decis\u00e3o de perdimento das vantagens.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: JORGE RAPOSO. I. A organiza\u00e7\u00e3o, a dimens\u00e3o do neg\u00f3cio, a sua reitera\u00e7\u00e3o no tempo e os proventos obtidos afastam uma imagem global do facto correspondente a uma ilicitude diminu\u00edda e, pelo contr\u00e1rio, o facto de irem a Set\u00fabal adquirir estupefacientes acompanhados pelo filho menor acarreta j\u00e1 um grau de ilicitude acrescido (art. 24\u00ba al. i) do Decreto-Lei 15\/93). II. Ponderadas que foram as especificidades do caso e a margem de actua\u00e7\u00e3o insindic\u00e1vel da actividade judicial na determina\u00e7\u00e3o da medida da pena, a natureza altamente perniciosa das subst\u00e2ncias estupefacientes traficadas (hero\u00edna e coca\u00edna) a reincidentes (reincid\u00eancia homog\u00e9nea, hom\u00f3tropa ou espec\u00edfica), a pr\u00e1tica dos factos no per\u00edodo de liberdade condicional por crime de id\u00eantica natureza, a pena de 8 anos e 6 meses de pris\u00e3o n\u00e3o destoa da jurisprud\u00eancia deste Supremo Tribunal para casos semelhantes e mostra-se proporcional, adequada e necess\u00e1ria e conforme aos crit\u00e9rios plasmados no art. 71\u00ba do C\u00f3digo Penal. III. De acordo com jurisprud\u00eancia sedimentada deste Supremo, n\u00e3o \u00e9 admiss\u00edvel recurso para o Supremo Tribunal com os fundamentos previstos nos n\u00bas 2 e 3 do art. 410\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Penal e, bem assim, n\u00e3o \u00e9 admiss\u00edvel que o recorrente submeta inovatoriamente \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a a quest\u00e3o (dos v\u00edcios) que optou por n\u00e3o submeter \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do tribunal da rela\u00e7\u00e3o (art. 410\u00ba n\u00ba 1 do C\u00f3digo de Processo Penal); consequentemente, deve ser rejeitado o recurso na parte em que invoca contradi\u00e7\u00e3o insan\u00e1vel entre a fundamenta\u00e7\u00e3o e a decis\u00e3o de perdimento das vantagens.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7774,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-577155","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 23\/22.9PEEVR.E1.S1 \u2013 2025-04-30 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 23\/22.9PEEVR.E1.S1 \u2013 2025-04-30\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE RAPOSO. I. A organiza\u00e7\u00e3o, a dimens\u00e3o do neg\u00f3cio, a sua reitera\u00e7\u00e3o no tempo e os proventos obtidos afastam uma imagem global do facto correspondente a uma ilicitude diminu\u00edda e, pelo contr\u00e1rio, o facto de irem a Set\u00fabal adquirir estupefacientes acompanhados pelo filho menor acarreta j\u00e1 um grau de ilicitude acrescido (art. 24\u00ba al. i) do Decreto-Lei 15\/93). II. Ponderadas que foram as especificidades do caso e a margem de actua\u00e7\u00e3o insindic\u00e1vel da actividade judicial na determina\u00e7\u00e3o da medida da pena, a natureza altamente perniciosa das subst\u00e2ncias estupefacientes traficadas (hero\u00edna e coca\u00edna) a reincidentes (reincid\u00eancia homog\u00e9nea, hom\u00f3tropa ou espec\u00edfica), a pr\u00e1tica dos factos no per\u00edodo de liberdade condicional por crime de id\u00eantica natureza, a pena de 8 anos e 6 meses de pris\u00e3o n\u00e3o destoa da jurisprud\u00eancia deste Supremo Tribunal para casos semelhantes e mostra-se proporcional, adequada e necess\u00e1ria e conforme aos crit\u00e9rios plasmados no art. 71\u00ba do C\u00f3digo Penal. III. De acordo com jurisprud\u00eancia sedimentada deste Supremo, n\u00e3o \u00e9 admiss\u00edvel recurso para o Supremo Tribunal com os fundamentos previstos nos n\u00bas 2 e 3 do art. 410\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Penal e, bem assim, n\u00e3o \u00e9 admiss\u00edvel que o recorrente submeta inovatoriamente \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a a quest\u00e3o (dos v\u00edcios) que optou por n\u00e3o submeter \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do tribunal da rela\u00e7\u00e3o (art. 410\u00ba n\u00ba 1 do C\u00f3digo de Processo Penal); consequentemente, deve ser rejeitado o recurso na parte em que invoca contradi\u00e7\u00e3o insan\u00e1vel entre a fundamenta\u00e7\u00e3o e a decis\u00e3o de perdimento das vantagens.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-11T00:46:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 23\\\/22.9PEEVR.E1.S1 \u2013 2025-04-30 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-16T10:13:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-11T00:46:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 23\\\/22.9PEEVR.E1.S1 \u2013 2025-04-30\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 23\/22.9PEEVR.E1.S1 \u2013 2025-04-30 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 23\/22.9PEEVR.E1.S1 \u2013 2025-04-30","og_description":"Relator: JORGE RAPOSO. I. A organiza\u00e7\u00e3o, a dimens\u00e3o do neg\u00f3cio, a sua reitera\u00e7\u00e3o no tempo e os proventos obtidos afastam uma imagem global do facto correspondente a uma ilicitude diminu\u00edda e, pelo contr\u00e1rio, o facto de irem a Set\u00fabal adquirir estupefacientes acompanhados pelo filho menor acarreta j\u00e1 um grau de ilicitude acrescido (art. 24\u00ba al. i) do Decreto-Lei 15\/93). II. Ponderadas que foram as especificidades do caso e a margem de actua\u00e7\u00e3o insindic\u00e1vel da actividade judicial na determina\u00e7\u00e3o da medida da pena, a natureza altamente perniciosa das subst\u00e2ncias estupefacientes traficadas (hero\u00edna e coca\u00edna) a reincidentes (reincid\u00eancia homog\u00e9nea, hom\u00f3tropa ou espec\u00edfica), a pr\u00e1tica dos factos no per\u00edodo de liberdade condicional por crime de id\u00eantica natureza, a pena de 8 anos e 6 meses de pris\u00e3o n\u00e3o destoa da jurisprud\u00eancia deste Supremo Tribunal para casos semelhantes e mostra-se proporcional, adequada e necess\u00e1ria e conforme aos crit\u00e9rios plasmados no art. 71\u00ba do C\u00f3digo Penal. III. De acordo com jurisprud\u00eancia sedimentada deste Supremo, n\u00e3o \u00e9 admiss\u00edvel recurso para o Supremo Tribunal com os fundamentos previstos nos n\u00bas 2 e 3 do art. 410\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Penal e, bem assim, n\u00e3o \u00e9 admiss\u00edvel que o recorrente submeta inovatoriamente \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a a quest\u00e3o (dos v\u00edcios) que optou por n\u00e3o submeter \u00e0 aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o do tribunal da rela\u00e7\u00e3o (art. 410\u00ba n\u00ba 1 do C\u00f3digo de Processo Penal); consequentemente, deve ser rejeitado o recurso na parte em que invoca contradi\u00e7\u00e3o insan\u00e1vel entre a fundamenta\u00e7\u00e3o e a decis\u00e3o de perdimento das vantagens.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-11T00:46:15+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"2 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 23\/22.9PEEVR.E1.S1 \u2013 2025-04-30 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-16T10:13:07+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-11T00:46:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-23-22-9peevr-e1-s1-2025-04-30\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 23\/22.9PEEVR.E1.S1 \u2013 2025-04-30"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/577155","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=577155"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=577155"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=577155"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=577155"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=577155"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=577155"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=577155"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=577155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}