{"id":579390,"date":"2026-04-16T19:04:39","date_gmt":"2026-04-16T17:04:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/"},"modified":"2026-04-16T19:04:39","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T17:04:39","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 4760\/21.7T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-25"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: AM?LIA ALVES RIBEIRO. I. Os v?cios de atos processuais previstos no artigo 195? CPC n?o se podem confundir com as nulidades da decis?o previstas no artigo 615.? do CPC, tendo regimes diferentes de argui??o, nomeadamente em mat?ria de prazos. II. Como se sabe, da mat?ria de facto n?o cabe, em regra, recurso para o STJ. Neste ?mbito, est?o dentro dos poderes de cogni??o do STJ, as situa??es em que estejam ?em causa as regras de direito que condicionam a admissibilidade ou estabelecem a for?a probat?ria de certo meio de prova?; ?as regras de reparti??o do ?nus de prova? ou ?o procedimento processual que condiciona a aplica??o do artigo 662? CPC? (artigos 674?\/3; 682?\/1 e 2 e 662?, todos do CPC). N?o s?o, pois sindic?veis pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a os argumentos que se situam no ?mbito da livre aprecia??o das provas. III. ? luz da orienta??o do AUJ 8\/22, mutatis mutandis, cabe aos AA., enquanto investidores, a produ??o de prova de que foi omitida a informa??o devida acerca da natureza, dos riscos e dos benef?cios de cada um dos produtos financeiros em causa.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: AM?LIA ALVES RIBEIRO. I. Os v?cios de atos processuais previstos no artigo 195? CPC n?o se podem confundir com as nulidades da decis?o previstas no artigo 615.? do CPC, tendo regimes diferentes de argui??o, nomeadamente em mat?ria de prazos. II. Como se sabe, da mat?ria de facto n?o cabe, em regra, recurso para o STJ. Neste ?mbito, est?o dentro dos poderes de cogni??o do STJ, as situa??es em que estejam ?em causa as regras de direito que condicionam a admissibilidade ou estabelecem a for?a probat?ria de certo meio de prova?; ?as regras de reparti??o do ?nus de prova? ou ?o procedimento processual que condiciona a aplica??o do artigo 662? CPC? (artigos 674?\/3; 682?\/1 e 2 e 662?, todos do CPC). N?o s?o, pois sindic?veis pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a os argumentos que se situam no ?mbito da livre aprecia??o das provas. III. ? luz da orienta??o do AUJ 8\/22, mutatis mutandis, cabe aos AA., enquanto investidores, a produ??o de prova de que foi omitida a informa??o devida acerca da natureza, dos riscos e dos benef?cios de cada um dos produtos financeiros em causa.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8887],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-579390","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-6-seco","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 4760\/21.7T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 4760\/21.7T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: AM?LIA ALVES RIBEIRO. I. Os v?cios de atos processuais previstos no artigo 195? CPC n?o se podem confundir com as nulidades da decis?o previstas no artigo 615.? do CPC, tendo regimes diferentes de argui??o, nomeadamente em mat?ria de prazos. II. Como se sabe, da mat?ria de facto n?o cabe, em regra, recurso para o STJ. Neste ?mbito, est?o dentro dos poderes de cogni??o do STJ, as situa??es em que estejam ?em causa as regras de direito que condicionam a admissibilidade ou estabelecem a for?a probat?ria de certo meio de prova?; ?as regras de reparti??o do ?nus de prova? ou ?o procedimento processual que condiciona a aplica??o do artigo 662? CPC? (artigos 674?\/3; 682?\/1 e 2 e 662?, todos do CPC). N?o s?o, pois sindic?veis pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a os argumentos que se situam no ?mbito da livre aprecia??o das provas. III. ? luz da orienta??o do AUJ 8\/22, mutatis mutandis, cabe aos AA., enquanto investidores, a produ??o de prova de que foi omitida a informa??o devida acerca da natureza, dos riscos e dos benef?cios de cada um dos produtos financeiros em causa.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 4760\\\/21.7T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-16T17:04:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 4760\\\/21.7T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 4760\/21.7T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 4760\/21.7T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-25","og_description":"Relator: AM?LIA ALVES RIBEIRO. I. Os v?cios de atos processuais previstos no artigo 195? CPC n?o se podem confundir com as nulidades da decis?o previstas no artigo 615.? do CPC, tendo regimes diferentes de argui??o, nomeadamente em mat?ria de prazos. II. Como se sabe, da mat?ria de facto n?o cabe, em regra, recurso para o STJ. Neste ?mbito, est?o dentro dos poderes de cogni??o do STJ, as situa??es em que estejam ?em causa as regras de direito que condicionam a admissibilidade ou estabelecem a for?a probat?ria de certo meio de prova?; ?as regras de reparti??o do ?nus de prova? ou ?o procedimento processual que condiciona a aplica??o do artigo 662? CPC? (artigos 674?\/3; 682?\/1 e 2 e 662?, todos do CPC). N?o s?o, pois sindic?veis pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a os argumentos que se situam no ?mbito da livre aprecia??o das provas. III. ? luz da orienta??o do AUJ 8\/22, mutatis mutandis, cabe aos AA., enquanto investidores, a produ??o de prova de que foi omitida a informa??o devida acerca da natureza, dos riscos e dos benef?cios de cada um dos produtos financeiros em causa.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 4760\/21.7T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-16T17:04:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-4760-21-7t8fnc-l1-s1-2025-03-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 4760\/21.7T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/579390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=579390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=579390"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=579390"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=579390"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=579390"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=579390"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=579390"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=579390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}