{"id":581680,"date":"2026-04-17T00:13:37","date_gmt":"2026-04-16T22:13:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-17T00:13:37","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T22:13:37","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 430\/22.7JASTB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-06"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I ? A men??o, em sede de reclama??o\/argui??o de nulidade, ao v?cio decis?rio da contradi??o insan?vel da fundamenta??o ou entre a fundamenta??o e a decis?o, previsto no artigo 410.?, n.?2, al. b), do CPP, ? desprovida de raz?o de ser, pois trata-se, como os restantes v?cios previstos no artigo 410.?, n.?2, do CPP, de v?cios inerentes ? decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto, quando ? sabido que o ac?rd?o deste STJ visou, exclusivamente, o reexame da mat?ria de direito. II — Uma decis?o ? obscura ou amb?gua quando for inintelig?vel, confusa ou de dif?cil interpreta??o, de sentido equ?voco ou indeterminado. A obscuridade de uma decis?o ? a imperfei??o desta que se traduz na sua ininteligibilidade; a ambiguidade tem lugar quando ? decis?o, no passo considerado, podem razoavelmente atribuir-se dois ou mais sentidos diferentes, s? relevando se vier a redundar em obscuridade, ou seja, se for tal que n?o seja poss?vel alcan?ar o sentido a atribuir ao passo da decis?o que se diz amb?guo.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I ? A men??o, em sede de reclama??o\/argui??o de nulidade, ao v?cio decis?rio da contradi??o insan?vel da fundamenta??o ou entre a fundamenta??o e a decis?o, previsto no artigo 410.?, n.?2, al. b), do CPP, ? desprovida de raz?o de ser, pois trata-se, como os restantes v?cios previstos no artigo 410.?, n.?2, do CPP, de v?cios inerentes ? decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto, quando ? sabido que o ac?rd?o deste STJ visou, exclusivamente, o reexame da mat?ria de direito. II — Uma decis?o ? obscura ou amb?gua quando for inintelig?vel, confusa ou de dif?cil interpreta??o, de sentido equ?voco ou indeterminado. A obscuridade de uma decis?o ? a imperfei??o desta que se traduz na sua ininteligibilidade; a ambiguidade tem lugar quando ? decis?o, no passo considerado, podem razoavelmente atribuir-se dois ou mais sentidos diferentes, s? relevando se vier a redundar em obscuridade, ou seja, se for tal que n?o seja poss?vel alcan?ar o sentido a atribuir ao passo da decis?o que se diz amb?guo.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-581680","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 430\/22.7JASTB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 430\/22.7JASTB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-06\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I ? A men??o, em sede de reclama??o\/argui??o de nulidade, ao v?cio decis?rio da contradi??o insan?vel da fundamenta??o ou entre a fundamenta??o e a decis?o, previsto no artigo 410.?, n.?2, al. b), do CPP, ? desprovida de raz?o de ser, pois trata-se, como os restantes v?cios previstos no artigo 410.?, n.?2, do CPP, de v?cios inerentes ? decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto, quando ? sabido que o ac?rd?o deste STJ visou, exclusivamente, o reexame da mat?ria de direito. II - Uma decis?o ? obscura ou amb?gua quando for inintelig?vel, confusa ou de dif?cil interpreta??o, de sentido equ?voco ou indeterminado. A obscuridade de uma decis?o ? a imperfei??o desta que se traduz na sua ininteligibilidade; a ambiguidade tem lugar quando ? decis?o, no passo considerado, podem razoavelmente atribuir-se dois ou mais sentidos diferentes, s? relevando se vier a redundar em obscuridade, ou seja, se for tal que n?o seja poss?vel alcan?ar o sentido a atribuir ao passo da decis?o que se diz amb?guo.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 430\\\/22.7JASTB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-16T22:13:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 430\\\/22.7JASTB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-06\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 430\/22.7JASTB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 430\/22.7JASTB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-06","og_description":"Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I ? A men??o, em sede de reclama??o\/argui??o de nulidade, ao v?cio decis?rio da contradi??o insan?vel da fundamenta??o ou entre a fundamenta??o e a decis?o, previsto no artigo 410.?, n.?2, al. b), do CPP, ? desprovida de raz?o de ser, pois trata-se, como os restantes v?cios previstos no artigo 410.?, n.?2, do CPP, de v?cios inerentes ? decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto, quando ? sabido que o ac?rd?o deste STJ visou, exclusivamente, o reexame da mat?ria de direito. II - Uma decis?o ? obscura ou amb?gua quando for inintelig?vel, confusa ou de dif?cil interpreta??o, de sentido equ?voco ou indeterminado. A obscuridade de uma decis?o ? a imperfei??o desta que se traduz na sua ininteligibilidade; a ambiguidade tem lugar quando ? decis?o, no passo considerado, podem razoavelmente atribuir-se dois ou mais sentidos diferentes, s? relevando se vier a redundar em obscuridade, ou seja, se for tal que n?o seja poss?vel alcan?ar o sentido a atribuir ao passo da decis?o que se diz amb?guo.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 430\/22.7JASTB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-16T22:13:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-430-22-7jastb-l1-s1-2025-03-06-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 430\/22.7JASTB.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-03-06"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/581680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=581680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=581680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=581680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=581680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=581680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=581680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=581680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=581680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}