{"id":581919,"date":"2026-04-17T00:58:53","date_gmt":"2026-04-16T22:58:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/"},"modified":"2026-04-17T00:58:53","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T22:58:53","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8042\/20.3T8LRS.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-02-25"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: CRISTINA COELHO. I. A exist?ncia de uma servid?o administrativa, no caso, resultante do art. 21? da Lei 54\/2005, de 15.11, n?o se enquadra na cl?usula inserta num contrato promessa de compra e venda nos termos da qual os promitentes vendedores prometem vender um lote de terreno para constru??o livre de quaisquer ?nus ou encargos, d?vidas ou responsabilidades emergentes da propriedade, quer de natureza real, quer obrigacional, e devoluto de pessoas e bens. II. Destinando-se o lote de terreno prometido vender a constru??o, a presta??o ser? objetivamente imposs?vel se a mencionada servid?o administrativa obstar ? edifica??o, caso em que se verificar? n?o uma impossibilidade superveniente da presta??o, mas uma impossibilidade total da presta??o, ab initio, a determinar a nulidade do contrato promessa, nos termos do art. 401? do CC. III. N?o resultando demonstrado que a servid?o administrativa em causa impede a edifica??o a que o lote prometido vender se destina, ou, sequer, que a limite em termos edificativos, nem que p?e em causa a constru??o projetada pelos AA., que n?o foi elemento essencial da base negocial, inexiste fundamento para a recusa de cumprimento do contrato promessa.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: CRISTINA COELHO. I. A exist?ncia de uma servid?o administrativa, no caso, resultante do art. 21? da Lei 54\/2005, de 15.11, n?o se enquadra na cl?usula inserta num contrato promessa de compra e venda nos termos da qual os promitentes vendedores prometem vender um lote de terreno para constru??o livre de quaisquer ?nus ou encargos, d?vidas ou responsabilidades emergentes da propriedade, quer de natureza real, quer obrigacional, e devoluto de pessoas e bens. II. Destinando-se o lote de terreno prometido vender a constru??o, a presta??o ser? objetivamente imposs?vel se a mencionada servid?o administrativa obstar ? edifica??o, caso em que se verificar? n?o uma impossibilidade superveniente da presta??o, mas uma impossibilidade total da presta??o, ab initio, a determinar a nulidade do contrato promessa, nos termos do art. 401? do CC. III. N?o resultando demonstrado que a servid?o administrativa em causa impede a edifica??o a que o lote prometido vender se destina, ou, sequer, que a limite em termos edificativos, nem que p?e em causa a constru??o projetada pelos AA., que n?o foi elemento essencial da base negocial, inexiste fundamento para a recusa de cumprimento do contrato promessa.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8887],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-581919","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-6-seco","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8042\/20.3T8LRS.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-02-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8042\/20.3T8LRS.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-02-25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: CRISTINA COELHO. I. A exist?ncia de uma servid?o administrativa, no caso, resultante do art. 21? da Lei 54\/2005, de 15.11, n?o se enquadra na cl?usula inserta num contrato promessa de compra e venda nos termos da qual os promitentes vendedores prometem vender um lote de terreno para constru??o livre de quaisquer ?nus ou encargos, d?vidas ou responsabilidades emergentes da propriedade, quer de natureza real, quer obrigacional, e devoluto de pessoas e bens. II. Destinando-se o lote de terreno prometido vender a constru??o, a presta??o ser? objetivamente imposs?vel se a mencionada servid?o administrativa obstar ? edifica??o, caso em que se verificar? n?o uma impossibilidade superveniente da presta??o, mas uma impossibilidade total da presta??o, ab initio, a determinar a nulidade do contrato promessa, nos termos do art. 401? do CC. III. N?o resultando demonstrado que a servid?o administrativa em causa impede a edifica??o a que o lote prometido vender se destina, ou, sequer, que a limite em termos edificativos, nem que p?e em causa a constru??o projetada pelos AA., que n?o foi elemento essencial da base negocial, inexiste fundamento para a recusa de cumprimento do contrato promessa.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8042\\\/20.3T8LRS.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-02-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-16T22:58:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8042\\\/20.3T8LRS.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-02-25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8042\/20.3T8LRS.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-02-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8042\/20.3T8LRS.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-02-25","og_description":"Relator: CRISTINA COELHO. I. A exist?ncia de uma servid?o administrativa, no caso, resultante do art. 21? da Lei 54\/2005, de 15.11, n?o se enquadra na cl?usula inserta num contrato promessa de compra e venda nos termos da qual os promitentes vendedores prometem vender um lote de terreno para constru??o livre de quaisquer ?nus ou encargos, d?vidas ou responsabilidades emergentes da propriedade, quer de natureza real, quer obrigacional, e devoluto de pessoas e bens. II. Destinando-se o lote de terreno prometido vender a constru??o, a presta??o ser? objetivamente imposs?vel se a mencionada servid?o administrativa obstar ? edifica??o, caso em que se verificar? n?o uma impossibilidade superveniente da presta??o, mas uma impossibilidade total da presta??o, ab initio, a determinar a nulidade do contrato promessa, nos termos do art. 401? do CC. III. N?o resultando demonstrado que a servid?o administrativa em causa impede a edifica??o a que o lote prometido vender se destina, ou, sequer, que a limite em termos edificativos, nem que p?e em causa a constru??o projetada pelos AA., que n?o foi elemento essencial da base negocial, inexiste fundamento para a recusa de cumprimento do contrato promessa.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8042\/20.3T8LRS.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-02-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-16T22:58:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8042-20-3t8lrs-l1-s1-2025-02-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8042\/20.3T8LRS.L1.S1 \u2013 2025-02-25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/581919","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=581919"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=581919"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=581919"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=581919"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=581919"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=581919"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=581919"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=581919"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}