{"id":597242,"date":"2026-04-18T21:08:31","date_gmt":"2026-04-18T19:08:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/"},"modified":"2026-05-11T21:39:33","modified_gmt":"2026-05-11T19:39:33","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1983\/22.5PFAMD.S1 \u2013 2024-07-04"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: ALBERTINA PEREIRA. I &#8212; \u00c9 de considerar preenchido o crime de homic\u00eddio na forma tentada (artigos 131.\u00ba, 22.\u00ba, 23.\u00ba e 73.\u00ba n.\u00ba 1 al\u00edneas a) e b), do C\u00f3digo Penal) ) num caso, o presente, em que o arguido agindo com o firme prop\u00f3sito de tirar a vida ao ofendido, sabendo que, na zona tor\u00e1cica em que direcionou os disparos, se alojavam \u00f3rg\u00e3os vitais do corpo e essenciais \u00e0 vida, munido de um instrumento port\u00e1til, apto a disparar proj\u00e9teis atrav\u00e9s de a\u00e7\u00e3o de uma carga propulsora combust\u00edvel (p\u00f3lvora), cujas demais caracter\u00edsticas n\u00e3o se lograram apurar, correu na dire\u00e7\u00e3o daquele, efetuou pelo menos tr\u00eas disparos na sua dire\u00e7\u00e3o, um dos quais o atingiu na zona tor\u00e1cica posterior \u00e0 esquerda, na zona infraescapular, tendo-lhe causado traumatismo de natureza perfuro contundente, dores e les\u00f5es na zona atingida, que implicaram 20 dias de doen\u00e7a. O ofendido n\u00e3o morreu em virtude de ter sido assistido no local pelos servi\u00e7os de emerg\u00eancia m\u00e9dica. II &#8212; O arguido encetou, pois, atos id\u00f3neos a produzir o resultado t\u00edpico, iniciando, com a sua conduta volunt\u00e1ria e orientada para a produ\u00e7\u00e3o da morte do ofendido, um processo causal que apenas n\u00e3o se completou com a produ\u00e7\u00e3o daquele evento por motivos estranhos \u00e0 sua vontade. III &#8212; Pese embora o instrumento utilizado pelo arguido n\u00e3o se enquadre no elenco previsto na Lei n.\u00ba 5\/2006, de 23 de Fevereiro (Regime Jur\u00eddico das Armas e Muni\u00e7\u00f5es), o mesmo deve ser qualificado como arma \u00e0 luz da no\u00e7\u00e3o contida no art.\u00ba 4.\u00ba do DL 48\/95, de 15 de Mar\u00e7o.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/4c448942ebd6207480258b51002860ce?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: ALBERTINA PEREIRA. I &#8212; \u00c9 de considerar preenchido o crime de homic\u00eddio na forma tentada (artigos 131.\u00ba, 22.\u00ba, 23.\u00ba e 73.\u00ba n.\u00ba 1 al\u00edneas a) e b), do C\u00f3digo Penal) ) num caso, o presente, em que o arguido agindo com o firme prop\u00f3sito de tirar a vida ao ofendido, sabendo que, na zona tor\u00e1cica em que direcionou os disparos, se alojavam \u00f3rg\u00e3os vitais do corpo e essenciais \u00e0 vida, munido de um instrumento port\u00e1til, apto a disparar proj\u00e9teis atrav\u00e9s de a\u00e7\u00e3o de uma carga propulsora combust\u00edvel (p\u00f3lvora), cujas demais caracter\u00edsticas n\u00e3o se lograram apurar, correu na dire\u00e7\u00e3o daquele, efetuou pelo menos tr\u00eas disparos na sua dire\u00e7\u00e3o, um dos quais o atingiu na zona tor\u00e1cica posterior \u00e0 esquerda, na zona infraescapular, tendo-lhe causado traumatismo de natureza perfuro contundente, dores e les\u00f5es na zona atingida, que implicaram 20 dias de doen\u00e7a. O ofendido n\u00e3o morreu em virtude de ter sido assistido no local pelos servi\u00e7os de emerg\u00eancia m\u00e9dica. II &#8212; O arguido encetou, pois, atos id\u00f3neos a produzir o resultado t\u00edpico, iniciando, com a sua conduta volunt\u00e1ria e orientada para a produ\u00e7\u00e3o da morte do ofendido, um processo causal que apenas n\u00e3o se completou com a produ\u00e7\u00e3o daquele evento por motivos estranhos \u00e0 sua vontade. III &#8212; Pese embora o instrumento utilizado pelo arguido n\u00e3o se enquadre no elenco previsto na Lei n.\u00ba 5\/2006, de 23 de Fevereiro (Regime Jur\u00eddico das Armas e Muni\u00e7\u00f5es), o mesmo deve ser qualificado como arma \u00e0 luz da no\u00e7\u00e3o contida no art.\u00ba 4.\u00ba do DL 48\/95, de 15 de Mar\u00e7o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,22760,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-597242","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-pfamd","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1983\/22.5PFAMD.S1 \u2013 2024-07-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1983\/22.5PFAMD.S1 \u2013 2024-07-04\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ALBERTINA PEREIRA. I - \u00c9 de considerar preenchido o crime de homic\u00eddio na forma tentada (artigos 131.\u00ba, 22.\u00ba, 23.\u00ba e 73.\u00ba n.\u00ba 1 al\u00edneas a) e b), do C\u00f3digo Penal) ) num caso, o presente, em que o arguido agindo com o firme prop\u00f3sito de tirar a vida ao ofendido, sabendo que, na zona tor\u00e1cica em que direcionou os disparos, se alojavam \u00f3rg\u00e3os vitais do corpo e essenciais \u00e0 vida, munido de um instrumento port\u00e1til, apto a disparar proj\u00e9teis atrav\u00e9s de a\u00e7\u00e3o de uma carga propulsora combust\u00edvel (p\u00f3lvora), cujas demais caracter\u00edsticas n\u00e3o se lograram apurar, correu na dire\u00e7\u00e3o daquele, efetuou pelo menos tr\u00eas disparos na sua dire\u00e7\u00e3o, um dos quais o atingiu na zona tor\u00e1cica posterior \u00e0 esquerda, na zona infraescapular, tendo-lhe causado traumatismo de natureza perfuro contundente, dores e les\u00f5es na zona atingida, que implicaram 20 dias de doen\u00e7a. O ofendido n\u00e3o morreu em virtude de ter sido assistido no local pelos servi\u00e7os de emerg\u00eancia m\u00e9dica. II - O arguido encetou, pois, atos id\u00f3neos a produzir o resultado t\u00edpico, iniciando, com a sua conduta volunt\u00e1ria e orientada para a produ\u00e7\u00e3o da morte do ofendido, um processo causal que apenas n\u00e3o se completou com a produ\u00e7\u00e3o daquele evento por motivos estranhos \u00e0 sua vontade. III - Pese embora o instrumento utilizado pelo arguido n\u00e3o se enquadre no elenco previsto na Lei n.\u00ba 5\/2006, de 23 de Fevereiro (Regime Jur\u00eddico das Armas e Muni\u00e7\u00f5es), o mesmo deve ser qualificado como arma \u00e0 luz da no\u00e7\u00e3o contida no art.\u00ba 4.\u00ba do DL 48\/95, de 15 de Mar\u00e7o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-11T19:39:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1983\\\/22.5PFAMD.S1 \u2013 2024-07-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-18T19:08:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-11T19:39:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1983\\\/22.5PFAMD.S1 \u2013 2024-07-04\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1983\/22.5PFAMD.S1 \u2013 2024-07-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1983\/22.5PFAMD.S1 \u2013 2024-07-04","og_description":"Relator: ALBERTINA PEREIRA. I - \u00c9 de considerar preenchido o crime de homic\u00eddio na forma tentada (artigos 131.\u00ba, 22.\u00ba, 23.\u00ba e 73.\u00ba n.\u00ba 1 al\u00edneas a) e b), do C\u00f3digo Penal) ) num caso, o presente, em que o arguido agindo com o firme prop\u00f3sito de tirar a vida ao ofendido, sabendo que, na zona tor\u00e1cica em que direcionou os disparos, se alojavam \u00f3rg\u00e3os vitais do corpo e essenciais \u00e0 vida, munido de um instrumento port\u00e1til, apto a disparar proj\u00e9teis atrav\u00e9s de a\u00e7\u00e3o de uma carga propulsora combust\u00edvel (p\u00f3lvora), cujas demais caracter\u00edsticas n\u00e3o se lograram apurar, correu na dire\u00e7\u00e3o daquele, efetuou pelo menos tr\u00eas disparos na sua dire\u00e7\u00e3o, um dos quais o atingiu na zona tor\u00e1cica posterior \u00e0 esquerda, na zona infraescapular, tendo-lhe causado traumatismo de natureza perfuro contundente, dores e les\u00f5es na zona atingida, que implicaram 20 dias de doen\u00e7a. O ofendido n\u00e3o morreu em virtude de ter sido assistido no local pelos servi\u00e7os de emerg\u00eancia m\u00e9dica. II - O arguido encetou, pois, atos id\u00f3neos a produzir o resultado t\u00edpico, iniciando, com a sua conduta volunt\u00e1ria e orientada para a produ\u00e7\u00e3o da morte do ofendido, um processo causal que apenas n\u00e3o se completou com a produ\u00e7\u00e3o daquele evento por motivos estranhos \u00e0 sua vontade. III - Pese embora o instrumento utilizado pelo arguido n\u00e3o se enquadre no elenco previsto na Lei n.\u00ba 5\/2006, de 23 de Fevereiro (Regime Jur\u00eddico das Armas e Muni\u00e7\u00f5es), o mesmo deve ser qualificado como arma \u00e0 luz da no\u00e7\u00e3o contida no art.\u00ba 4.\u00ba do DL 48\/95, de 15 de Mar\u00e7o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-11T19:39:33+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"2 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1983\/22.5PFAMD.S1 \u2013 2024-07-04 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-18T19:08:31+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-11T19:39:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1983-22-5pfamd-s1-2024-07-04\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1983\/22.5PFAMD.S1 \u2013 2024-07-04"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/597242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=597242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=597242"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=597242"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=597242"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=597242"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=597242"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=597242"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=597242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}