{"id":599164,"date":"2026-04-18T23:54:16","date_gmt":"2026-04-18T21:54:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/"},"modified":"2026-04-18T23:54:16","modified_gmt":"2026-04-18T21:54:16","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 512\/21.2PLLRS.L2.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: JO?O RATO. I — Ap?s a entrada em vigor da atual reda??o dos artigos 432? e 434? do CPP, introduzida pela Lei n.? 94\/21, de 21.12, os recursos interpostos para o STJ ?de decis?es que n?o sejam irrecorr?veis proferidas pelas rela??es, em recurso, nos termos do artigo 400??, previstos na al. b) do n.? 1 daquele primeiro preceito, n?o podem ter como fundamento os v?cios e nulidades referidas no artigo 410?, n.?s 2 e 3, do mesmo diploma legal. II — Nesses casos, ainda que tenha sido admitido pelo tribunal da rela??o sem qualquer restri??o, decis?o que n?o vincula o tribunal ad quem, o recurso tem de ser rejeitado, por inadmissibilidade legal, nos termos das citadas disposi??es legais, conjugadas com as dos artigos 414?, n.?s 2 e 3, e 420?, n.? 1, al. b), tamb?m do CPP, sem preju?zo, naturalmente, do seu conhecimento oficioso, se do texto da decis?o recorrida, por si ou conjugado com as regras da experi?ncia comum, tais v?cios e nulidades resultarem evidentes, o que n?o ocorre no caso em apre?o.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: JO?O RATO. I — Ap?s a entrada em vigor da atual reda??o dos artigos 432? e 434? do CPP, introduzida pela Lei n.? 94\/21, de 21.12, os recursos interpostos para o STJ ?de decis?es que n?o sejam irrecorr?veis proferidas pelas rela??es, em recurso, nos termos do artigo 400??, previstos na al. b) do n.? 1 daquele primeiro preceito, n?o podem ter como fundamento os v?cios e nulidades referidas no artigo 410?, n.?s 2 e 3, do mesmo diploma legal. II — Nesses casos, ainda que tenha sido admitido pelo tribunal da rela??o sem qualquer restri??o, decis?o que n?o vincula o tribunal ad quem, o recurso tem de ser rejeitado, por inadmissibilidade legal, nos termos das citadas disposi??es legais, conjugadas com as dos artigos 414?, n.?s 2 e 3, e 420?, n.? 1, al. b), tamb?m do CPP, sem preju?zo, naturalmente, do seu conhecimento oficioso, se do texto da decis?o recorrida, por si ou conjugado com as regras da experi?ncia comum, tais v?cios e nulidades resultarem evidentes, o que n?o ocorre no caso em apre?o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,10051,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-599164","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-pllrs","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 512\/21.2PLLRS.L2.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 512\/21.2PLLRS.L2.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JO?O RATO. I - Ap?s a entrada em vigor da atual reda??o dos artigos 432? e 434? do CPP, introduzida pela Lei n.? 94\/21, de 21.12, os recursos interpostos para o STJ ?de decis?es que n?o sejam irrecorr?veis proferidas pelas rela??es, em recurso, nos termos do artigo 400??, previstos na al. b) do n.? 1 daquele primeiro preceito, n?o podem ter como fundamento os v?cios e nulidades referidas no artigo 410?, n.?s 2 e 3, do mesmo diploma legal. II - Nesses casos, ainda que tenha sido admitido pelo tribunal da rela??o sem qualquer restri??o, decis?o que n?o vincula o tribunal ad quem, o recurso tem de ser rejeitado, por inadmissibilidade legal, nos termos das citadas disposi??es legais, conjugadas com as dos artigos 414?, n.?s 2 e 3, e 420?, n.? 1, al. b), tamb?m do CPP, sem preju?zo, naturalmente, do seu conhecimento oficioso, se do texto da decis?o recorrida, por si ou conjugado com as regras da experi?ncia comum, tais v?cios e nulidades resultarem evidentes, o que n?o ocorre no caso em apre?o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 512\\\/21.2PLLRS.L2.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-18T21:54:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 512\\\/21.2PLLRS.L2.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 512\/21.2PLLRS.L2.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 512\/21.2PLLRS.L2.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23","og_description":"Relator: JO?O RATO. I - Ap?s a entrada em vigor da atual reda??o dos artigos 432? e 434? do CPP, introduzida pela Lei n.? 94\/21, de 21.12, os recursos interpostos para o STJ ?de decis?es que n?o sejam irrecorr?veis proferidas pelas rela??es, em recurso, nos termos do artigo 400??, previstos na al. b) do n.? 1 daquele primeiro preceito, n?o podem ter como fundamento os v?cios e nulidades referidas no artigo 410?, n.?s 2 e 3, do mesmo diploma legal. II - Nesses casos, ainda que tenha sido admitido pelo tribunal da rela??o sem qualquer restri??o, decis?o que n?o vincula o tribunal ad quem, o recurso tem de ser rejeitado, por inadmissibilidade legal, nos termos das citadas disposi??es legais, conjugadas com as dos artigos 414?, n.?s 2 e 3, e 420?, n.? 1, al. b), tamb?m do CPP, sem preju?zo, naturalmente, do seu conhecimento oficioso, se do texto da decis?o recorrida, por si ou conjugado com as regras da experi?ncia comum, tais v?cios e nulidades resultarem evidentes, o que n?o ocorre no caso em apre?o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 512\/21.2PLLRS.L2.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-18T21:54:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-512-21-2pllrs-l2-s1-2024-05-23\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 512\/21.2PLLRS.L2.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/599164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=599164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=599164"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=599164"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=599164"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=599164"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=599164"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=599164"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=599164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}