{"id":599169,"date":"2026-04-19T00:02:04","date_gmt":"2026-04-18T22:02:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/"},"modified":"2026-04-19T00:02:04","modified_gmt":"2026-04-18T22:02:04","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 181\/05.7JELSB-P.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I — ? admissibilidade da revis?o n?o obsta a falta de conclus?es, visto que no Cap?tulo II, T?tulo II do Livro IX, do CPP, que regula os tr?mites do recurso de revis?o, n?o se inclui qualquer norma que obrigue ? apresenta??o de conclus?es e, ao inv?s do que acontece para o recurso extraordin?rio de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia, inexiste norma com ?mbito id?ntico ? do artigo 448.? que manda aplicar subsidiariamente as regras dos recursos ordin?rios. II ? A revis?o n?o admite uma reaprecia??o da prova produzida em julgamento, nem se destina a analisar nulidades processuais ou outros v?cios do julgamento ou da senten?a (como os previstos no artigo 410.?, n.?2, do CPP), pois para essas situa??es existe o recurso ordin?rio. III — O fundamento de revis?o a que alude a al. f), n.? 1, do artigo 449.?, do CPP, exige a verifica??o cumulativa de 2 pressupostos: a) que a inconstitucionalidade da norma de conte?do menos favor?vel ao arguido seja declarada pelo TC com for?a obrigat?ria geral; b) que essa norma tenha servido de fundamento ? condena??o. IV — Se a norma declarada inconstitucional, com for?a obrigat?ria geral, n?o serviu de fundamento ? condena??o da senten?a a rever, n?o se verifica este fundamento, para al?m de que, nos termos do artigo 282.?, n.? 3, da CRP, n?o havendo decis?o em contr?rio do TC (que declara a norma inconstitucional, com for?a obrigat?ria geral), ficam ressalvados os casos julgados.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I — ? admissibilidade da revis?o n?o obsta a falta de conclus?es, visto que no Cap?tulo II, T?tulo II do Livro IX, do CPP, que regula os tr?mites do recurso de revis?o, n?o se inclui qualquer norma que obrigue ? apresenta??o de conclus?es e, ao inv?s do que acontece para o recurso extraordin?rio de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia, inexiste norma com ?mbito id?ntico ? do artigo 448.? que manda aplicar subsidiariamente as regras dos recursos ordin?rios. II ? A revis?o n?o admite uma reaprecia??o da prova produzida em julgamento, nem se destina a analisar nulidades processuais ou outros v?cios do julgamento ou da senten?a (como os previstos no artigo 410.?, n.?2, do CPP), pois para essas situa??es existe o recurso ordin?rio. III — O fundamento de revis?o a que alude a al. f), n.? 1, do artigo 449.?, do CPP, exige a verifica??o cumulativa de 2 pressupostos: a) que a inconstitucionalidade da norma de conte?do menos favor?vel ao arguido seja declarada pelo TC com for?a obrigat?ria geral; b) que essa norma tenha servido de fundamento ? condena??o. IV — Se a norma declarada inconstitucional, com for?a obrigat?ria geral, n?o serviu de fundamento ? condena??o da senten?a a rever, n?o se verifica este fundamento, para al?m de que, nos termos do artigo 282.?, n.? 3, da CRP, n?o havendo decis?o em contr?rio do TC (que declara a norma inconstitucional, com for?a obrigat?ria geral), ficam ressalvados os casos julgados.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[7772,23140,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-599169","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-jelsb-p","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 181\/05.7JELSB-P.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 181\/05.7JELSB-P.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I - ? admissibilidade da revis?o n?o obsta a falta de conclus?es, visto que no Cap?tulo II, T?tulo II do Livro IX, do CPP, que regula os tr?mites do recurso de revis?o, n?o se inclui qualquer norma que obrigue ? apresenta??o de conclus?es e, ao inv?s do que acontece para o recurso extraordin?rio de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia, inexiste norma com ?mbito id?ntico ? do artigo 448.? que manda aplicar subsidiariamente as regras dos recursos ordin?rios. II ? A revis?o n?o admite uma reaprecia??o da prova produzida em julgamento, nem se destina a analisar nulidades processuais ou outros v?cios do julgamento ou da senten?a (como os previstos no artigo 410.?, n.?2, do CPP), pois para essas situa??es existe o recurso ordin?rio. III - O fundamento de revis?o a que alude a al. f), n.? 1, do artigo 449.?, do CPP, exige a verifica??o cumulativa de 2 pressupostos: a) que a inconstitucionalidade da norma de conte?do menos favor?vel ao arguido seja declarada pelo TC com for?a obrigat?ria geral; b) que essa norma tenha servido de fundamento ? condena??o. IV - Se a norma declarada inconstitucional, com for?a obrigat?ria geral, n?o serviu de fundamento ? condena??o da senten?a a rever, n?o se verifica este fundamento, para al?m de que, nos termos do artigo 282.?, n.? 3, da CRP, n?o havendo decis?o em contr?rio do TC (que declara a norma inconstitucional, com for?a obrigat?ria geral), ficam ressalvados os casos julgados.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 181\\\/05.7JELSB-P.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-18T22:02:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 181\\\/05.7JELSB-P.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 181\/05.7JELSB-P.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 181\/05.7JELSB-P.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23","og_description":"Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I - ? admissibilidade da revis?o n?o obsta a falta de conclus?es, visto que no Cap?tulo II, T?tulo II do Livro IX, do CPP, que regula os tr?mites do recurso de revis?o, n?o se inclui qualquer norma que obrigue ? apresenta??o de conclus?es e, ao inv?s do que acontece para o recurso extraordin?rio de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia, inexiste norma com ?mbito id?ntico ? do artigo 448.? que manda aplicar subsidiariamente as regras dos recursos ordin?rios. II ? A revis?o n?o admite uma reaprecia??o da prova produzida em julgamento, nem se destina a analisar nulidades processuais ou outros v?cios do julgamento ou da senten?a (como os previstos no artigo 410.?, n.?2, do CPP), pois para essas situa??es existe o recurso ordin?rio. III - O fundamento de revis?o a que alude a al. f), n.? 1, do artigo 449.?, do CPP, exige a verifica??o cumulativa de 2 pressupostos: a) que a inconstitucionalidade da norma de conte?do menos favor?vel ao arguido seja declarada pelo TC com for?a obrigat?ria geral; b) que essa norma tenha servido de fundamento ? condena??o. IV - Se a norma declarada inconstitucional, com for?a obrigat?ria geral, n?o serviu de fundamento ? condena??o da senten?a a rever, n?o se verifica este fundamento, para al?m de que, nos termos do artigo 282.?, n.? 3, da CRP, n?o havendo decis?o em contr?rio do TC (que declara a norma inconstitucional, com for?a obrigat?ria geral), ficam ressalvados os casos julgados.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 181\/05.7JELSB-P.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-18T22:02:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-181-05-7jelsb-p-s1-2024-05-23\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 181\/05.7JELSB-P.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/599169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=599169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=599169"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=599169"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=599169"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=599169"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=599169"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=599169"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=599169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}