{"id":599173,"date":"2026-04-19T00:02:15","date_gmt":"2026-04-18T22:02:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/"},"modified":"2026-04-19T00:02:15","modified_gmt":"2026-04-18T22:02:15","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 534\/24.1T9SNT-B.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I &#8212; O habeas corpus ? uma provid?ncia extraordin?ria e expedita, independente do sistema de recursos penais, que se destina exclusivamente a salvaguardar o direito ? liberdade. II &#8212; Os motivos de ?ilegalidade da pris?o?, como fundamento da provid?ncia de habeas corpus, t?m de reconduzir-se, necessariamente, ? previs?o das al?neas do n.? 2 do artigo 222.? do CPP, de enumera??o taxativa. III &#8212; De h? muito que o STJ mant?m o entendimento uniforme na sua jurisprud?ncia no sentido de que a pris?o preventiva ? ilegal quando se mant?m para al?m dos prazos fixados pela lei, isto ?, quando s?o ultrapassados os prazos fixados no artigo 215.?, do CPP, e apenas esses, ou [se mant?m] depois de verificada causa extintiva (artigo 214.?, do CPP). IV &#8212; Mesmo que no caso tivesse ocorrido atraso ? que n?o ocorreu ? na prola??o de despacho de reexame trimestral da medida de pris?o preventiva, tal n?o consubstanciaria pris?o ilegal, a legitimar o uso da provid?ncia de habeas corpus, mas apenas irregularidade processual, o que significa que, como tem sido repetido na jurisprud?ncia do STJ, n?o constituindo o prazo de reexame um prazo m?ximo de dura??o da pris?o, a sua n?o observ?ncia n?o constitui fundamento para a presente provid?ncia.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/f2ac32226d5e4a9980258b270027c892?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I &#8212; O habeas corpus ? uma provid?ncia extraordin?ria e expedita, independente do sistema de recursos penais, que se destina exclusivamente a salvaguardar o direito ? liberdade. II &#8212; Os motivos de ?ilegalidade da pris?o?, como fundamento da provid?ncia de habeas corpus, t?m de reconduzir-se, necessariamente, ? previs?o das al?neas do n.? 2 do artigo 222.? do CPP, de enumera??o taxativa. III &#8212; De h? muito que o STJ mant?m o entendimento uniforme na sua jurisprud?ncia no sentido de que a pris?o preventiva ? ilegal quando se mant?m para al?m dos prazos fixados pela lei, isto ?, quando s?o ultrapassados os prazos fixados no artigo 215.?, do CPP, e apenas esses, ou [se mant?m] depois de verificada causa extintiva (artigo 214.?, do CPP). IV &#8212; Mesmo que no caso tivesse ocorrido atraso ? que n?o ocorreu ? na prola??o de despacho de reexame trimestral da medida de pris?o preventiva, tal n?o consubstanciaria pris?o ilegal, a legitimar o uso da provid?ncia de habeas corpus, mas apenas irregularidade processual, o que significa que, como tem sido repetido na jurisprud?ncia do STJ, n?o constituindo o prazo de reexame um prazo m?ximo de dura??o da pris?o, a sua n?o observ?ncia n?o constitui fundamento para a presente provid?ncia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-599173","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 534\/24.1T9SNT-B.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 534\/24.1T9SNT-B.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I - O habeas corpus ? uma provid?ncia extraordin?ria e expedita, independente do sistema de recursos penais, que se destina exclusivamente a salvaguardar o direito ? liberdade. II - Os motivos de ?ilegalidade da pris?o?, como fundamento da provid?ncia de habeas corpus, t?m de reconduzir-se, necessariamente, ? previs?o das al?neas do n.? 2 do artigo 222.? do CPP, de enumera??o taxativa. III - De h? muito que o STJ mant?m o entendimento uniforme na sua jurisprud?ncia no sentido de que a pris?o preventiva ? ilegal quando se mant?m para al?m dos prazos fixados pela lei, isto ?, quando s?o ultrapassados os prazos fixados no artigo 215.?, do CPP, e apenas esses, ou [se mant?m] depois de verificada causa extintiva (artigo 214.?, do CPP). IV - Mesmo que no caso tivesse ocorrido atraso ? que n?o ocorreu ? na prola??o de despacho de reexame trimestral da medida de pris?o preventiva, tal n?o consubstanciaria pris?o ilegal, a legitimar o uso da provid?ncia de habeas corpus, mas apenas irregularidade processual, o que significa que, como tem sido repetido na jurisprud?ncia do STJ, n?o constituindo o prazo de reexame um prazo m?ximo de dura??o da pris?o, a sua n?o observ?ncia n?o constitui fundamento para a presente provid?ncia.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 534\\\/24.1T9SNT-B.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-18T22:02:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 534\\\/24.1T9SNT-B.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 534\/24.1T9SNT-B.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 534\/24.1T9SNT-B.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23","og_description":"Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I - O habeas corpus ? uma provid?ncia extraordin?ria e expedita, independente do sistema de recursos penais, que se destina exclusivamente a salvaguardar o direito ? liberdade. II - Os motivos de ?ilegalidade da pris?o?, como fundamento da provid?ncia de habeas corpus, t?m de reconduzir-se, necessariamente, ? previs?o das al?neas do n.? 2 do artigo 222.? do CPP, de enumera??o taxativa. III - De h? muito que o STJ mant?m o entendimento uniforme na sua jurisprud?ncia no sentido de que a pris?o preventiva ? ilegal quando se mant?m para al?m dos prazos fixados pela lei, isto ?, quando s?o ultrapassados os prazos fixados no artigo 215.?, do CPP, e apenas esses, ou [se mant?m] depois de verificada causa extintiva (artigo 214.?, do CPP). IV - Mesmo que no caso tivesse ocorrido atraso ? que n?o ocorreu ? na prola??o de despacho de reexame trimestral da medida de pris?o preventiva, tal n?o consubstanciaria pris?o ilegal, a legitimar o uso da provid?ncia de habeas corpus, mas apenas irregularidade processual, o que significa que, como tem sido repetido na jurisprud?ncia do STJ, n?o constituindo o prazo de reexame um prazo m?ximo de dura??o da pris?o, a sua n?o observ?ncia n?o constitui fundamento para a presente provid?ncia.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 534\/24.1T9SNT-B.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-18T22:02:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-534-24-1t9snt-b-s1-2024-05-23\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 534\/24.1T9SNT-B.S1 \u2013 2024-05-23"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/599173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=599173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=599173"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=599173"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=599173"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=599173"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=599173"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=599173"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=599173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}