{"id":599438,"date":"2026-04-19T00:47:40","date_gmt":"2026-04-18T22:47:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/"},"modified":"2026-04-19T00:47:40","modified_gmt":"2026-04-18T22:47:40","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 827\/16.1T9STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2024-05-09"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: VASQUES OS?RIO. I — Ocorre a nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia quando o tribunal n?o conhe?a de quest?es que devesse apreciar, entendendo-se por estas, os problemas concretos, de facto e de direito, submetidos ao seu conhecimento e n?o, os motivos e argumentos invocados pelos sujeitos processuais em abono da pretens?o formulada. II — Tendo o recorrente submetido ao conhecimento da Rela??o, em sede de impugna??o ampla da mat?ria de facto, quest?o tendo por objecto a inexist?ncia de nexo causal entre a regra de seguran?a violada e o acidente que afectou o assistente, e tendo o tribunal superior consignado no ac?rd?o proferido, n?o poder conhecer da impugna??o deduzida, por n?o ter o recorrente observado o ?nus de especifica??o, previsto no art. 412.?, n.os 3 e 4 do CPP, resulta impl?cito o entendimento da Rela??o, de n?o se verificar, a pretendida inexist?ncia daquele nexo causal. III — Tendo a quest?o da inexist?ncia do nexo de causalidade sido tacitamente desconsiderada e indeferida pela Rela??o, n?o se verifica a invocada omiss?o de pron?ncia.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: VASQUES OS?RIO. I — Ocorre a nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia quando o tribunal n?o conhe?a de quest?es que devesse apreciar, entendendo-se por estas, os problemas concretos, de facto e de direito, submetidos ao seu conhecimento e n?o, os motivos e argumentos invocados pelos sujeitos processuais em abono da pretens?o formulada. II — Tendo o recorrente submetido ao conhecimento da Rela??o, em sede de impugna??o ampla da mat?ria de facto, quest?o tendo por objecto a inexist?ncia de nexo causal entre a regra de seguran?a violada e o acidente que afectou o assistente, e tendo o tribunal superior consignado no ac?rd?o proferido, n?o poder conhecer da impugna??o deduzida, por n?o ter o recorrente observado o ?nus de especifica??o, previsto no art. 412.?, n.os 3 e 4 do CPP, resulta impl?cito o entendimento da Rela??o, de n?o se verificar, a pretendida inexist?ncia daquele nexo causal. III — Tendo a quest?o da inexist?ncia do nexo de causalidade sido tacitamente desconsiderada e indeferida pela Rela??o, n?o se verifica a invocada omiss?o de pron?ncia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-599438","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 827\/16.1T9STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2024-05-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 827\/16.1T9STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2024-05-09\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: VASQUES OS?RIO. I - Ocorre a nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia quando o tribunal n?o conhe?a de quest?es que devesse apreciar, entendendo-se por estas, os problemas concretos, de facto e de direito, submetidos ao seu conhecimento e n?o, os motivos e argumentos invocados pelos sujeitos processuais em abono da pretens?o formulada. II - Tendo o recorrente submetido ao conhecimento da Rela??o, em sede de impugna??o ampla da mat?ria de facto, quest?o tendo por objecto a inexist?ncia de nexo causal entre a regra de seguran?a violada e o acidente que afectou o assistente, e tendo o tribunal superior consignado no ac?rd?o proferido, n?o poder conhecer da impugna??o deduzida, por n?o ter o recorrente observado o ?nus de especifica??o, previsto no art. 412.?, n.os 3 e 4 do CPP, resulta impl?cito o entendimento da Rela??o, de n?o se verificar, a pretendida inexist?ncia daquele nexo causal. III - Tendo a quest?o da inexist?ncia do nexo de causalidade sido tacitamente desconsiderada e indeferida pela Rela??o, n?o se verifica a invocada omiss?o de pron?ncia.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 827\\\/16.1T9STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2024-05-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-18T22:47:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 827\\\/16.1T9STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2024-05-09\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 827\/16.1T9STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2024-05-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 827\/16.1T9STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2024-05-09","og_description":"Relator: VASQUES OS?RIO. I - Ocorre a nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia quando o tribunal n?o conhe?a de quest?es que devesse apreciar, entendendo-se por estas, os problemas concretos, de facto e de direito, submetidos ao seu conhecimento e n?o, os motivos e argumentos invocados pelos sujeitos processuais em abono da pretens?o formulada. II - Tendo o recorrente submetido ao conhecimento da Rela??o, em sede de impugna??o ampla da mat?ria de facto, quest?o tendo por objecto a inexist?ncia de nexo causal entre a regra de seguran?a violada e o acidente que afectou o assistente, e tendo o tribunal superior consignado no ac?rd?o proferido, n?o poder conhecer da impugna??o deduzida, por n?o ter o recorrente observado o ?nus de especifica??o, previsto no art. 412.?, n.os 3 e 4 do CPP, resulta impl?cito o entendimento da Rela??o, de n?o se verificar, a pretendida inexist?ncia daquele nexo causal. III - Tendo a quest?o da inexist?ncia do nexo de causalidade sido tacitamente desconsiderada e indeferida pela Rela??o, n?o se verifica a invocada omiss?o de pron?ncia.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 827\/16.1T9STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2024-05-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-18T22:47:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-827-16-1t9str-e1-s1-2024-05-09\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 827\/16.1T9STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2024-05-09"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/599438","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=599438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=599438"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=599438"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=599438"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=599438"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=599438"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=599438"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=599438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}