{"id":603389,"date":"2026-04-19T09:47:51","date_gmt":"2026-04-19T07:47:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/"},"modified":"2026-04-19T09:47:51","modified_gmt":"2026-04-19T07:47:51","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3032\/23.7YRLSB-A.S1 \u2013 2024-02-08"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: VASQUES OS?RIO. I — Tendo transitado em julgado o ac?rd?o do STJ que confirmou o ac?rd?o da Rela??o de Lisboa onde foi ordenado o cumprimento do mandado de deten??o europeu emitido pela Rep?blica Francesa e consequente entrega da requerente ?s autoridades judiciais deste Estado, iniciou-se a fase de execu??o do referido mandado. II — A requerente foi detida e entregue no Estabelecimento Prisional ao abrigo de mandado de deten??o emitido pelo respectivo Juiz Desembargador Relator. III — Saber se no acto da deten??o da requerente foi ou n?o cumprido o disposto no n.? 3 do art. 258.? do CPP, ? quest?o que ultrapassa o ?mbito do habeas corpus, pois esta provid?ncia n?o serve para arguir nulidades ou irregularidades, as quais devem ser suscitadas no processo respectivo. IV — Assim, porque a pris?o foi ordenada pelo juiz competente e foi determinada por facto que a lei admite, inexiste o fundamento de habeas corpus invocado pelo requerente<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: VASQUES OS?RIO. I — Tendo transitado em julgado o ac?rd?o do STJ que confirmou o ac?rd?o da Rela??o de Lisboa onde foi ordenado o cumprimento do mandado de deten??o europeu emitido pela Rep?blica Francesa e consequente entrega da requerente ?s autoridades judiciais deste Estado, iniciou-se a fase de execu??o do referido mandado. II — A requerente foi detida e entregue no Estabelecimento Prisional ao abrigo de mandado de deten??o emitido pelo respectivo Juiz Desembargador Relator. III — Saber se no acto da deten??o da requerente foi ou n?o cumprido o disposto no n.? 3 do art. 258.? do CPP, ? quest?o que ultrapassa o ?mbito do habeas corpus, pois esta provid?ncia n?o serve para arguir nulidades ou irregularidades, as quais devem ser suscitadas no processo respectivo. IV — Assim, porque a pris?o foi ordenada pelo juiz competente e foi determinada por facto que a lei admite, inexiste o fundamento de habeas corpus invocado pelo requerente<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7771,7773,7636,13165],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-603389","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_keyword-yrlsb-a","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3032\/23.7YRLSB-A.S1 \u2013 2024-02-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3032\/23.7YRLSB-A.S1 \u2013 2024-02-08\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: VASQUES OS?RIO. I - Tendo transitado em julgado o ac?rd?o do STJ que confirmou o ac?rd?o da Rela??o de Lisboa onde foi ordenado o cumprimento do mandado de deten??o europeu emitido pela Rep?blica Francesa e consequente entrega da requerente ?s autoridades judiciais deste Estado, iniciou-se a fase de execu??o do referido mandado. II - A requerente foi detida e entregue no Estabelecimento Prisional ao abrigo de mandado de deten??o emitido pelo respectivo Juiz Desembargador Relator. III - Saber se no acto da deten??o da requerente foi ou n?o cumprido o disposto no n.? 3 do art. 258.? do CPP, ? quest?o que ultrapassa o ?mbito do habeas corpus, pois esta provid?ncia n?o serve para arguir nulidades ou irregularidades, as quais devem ser suscitadas no processo respectivo. IV - Assim, porque a pris?o foi ordenada pelo juiz competente e foi determinada por facto que a lei admite, inexiste o fundamento de habeas corpus invocado pelo requerente\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3032\\\/23.7YRLSB-A.S1 \u2013 2024-02-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-19T07:47:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3032\\\/23.7YRLSB-A.S1 \u2013 2024-02-08\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3032\/23.7YRLSB-A.S1 \u2013 2024-02-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3032\/23.7YRLSB-A.S1 \u2013 2024-02-08","og_description":"Relator: VASQUES OS?RIO. I - Tendo transitado em julgado o ac?rd?o do STJ que confirmou o ac?rd?o da Rela??o de Lisboa onde foi ordenado o cumprimento do mandado de deten??o europeu emitido pela Rep?blica Francesa e consequente entrega da requerente ?s autoridades judiciais deste Estado, iniciou-se a fase de execu??o do referido mandado. II - A requerente foi detida e entregue no Estabelecimento Prisional ao abrigo de mandado de deten??o emitido pelo respectivo Juiz Desembargador Relator. III - Saber se no acto da deten??o da requerente foi ou n?o cumprido o disposto no n.? 3 do art. 258.? do CPP, ? quest?o que ultrapassa o ?mbito do habeas corpus, pois esta provid?ncia n?o serve para arguir nulidades ou irregularidades, as quais devem ser suscitadas no processo respectivo. IV - Assim, porque a pris?o foi ordenada pelo juiz competente e foi determinada por facto que a lei admite, inexiste o fundamento de habeas corpus invocado pelo requerente","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3032\/23.7YRLSB-A.S1 \u2013 2024-02-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-19T07:47:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3032-23-7yrlsb-a-s1-2024-02-08\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3032\/23.7YRLSB-A.S1 \u2013 2024-02-08"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/603389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=603389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=603389"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=603389"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=603389"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=603389"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=603389"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=603389"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=603389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}