{"id":605061,"date":"2026-04-19T12:46:57","date_gmt":"2026-04-19T10:46:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/"},"modified":"2026-04-19T12:46:57","modified_gmt":"2026-04-19T10:46:57","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 481\/19.9T8LLE.C1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-23"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I &#8212; A autora, Massa Insolvente de AA, est? vinculada ao ?nus de impugnar os fundamentos da exce??o perent?ria alegada pelo r?u, na contesta??o, ?ltimo articulado admiss?vel, ?nus que deve cumprir, sob pena de preclus?o, na audi?ncia pr?via, se esta tiver lugar, ou, n?o havendo lugar a ela, no in?cio da audi?ncia final, nos termos do n.? 4 do artigo 3.? do CPC. II &#8212; N?o tendo a autora impugnado os factos que fundamentam a exce??o perent?ria de nulidade por simula??o alegada pelo r?u, quando notificada para tal pelo tribunal de 1.? inst?ncia, aqueles factos devem considerar-se provados por acordo das partes, por aplica??o dos artigos 587.?, n.? 1 e 574.?, ambos do C?digo de Processo Civil. III &#8212; A determina??o dos requisitos da simula??o, designadamente da inten??o dos contraentes e do intuito de enganar terceiros, ? mat?ria de facto, cujo apuramento ? da exclusiva compet?ncia das inst?ncias. IV ? Um neg?cio dissimulado, em que um sujeito contrata outro para servir de testa de ferro na constitui??o de uma sociedade comercial a troco de uma remunera??o ? um neg?cio celebrado com fraude ? lei (artigo 280.?, n.? 1, do C?digo Civil), ou contr?rio ? ordem p?blica e ofensivo dos bons costumes (artigo 280.?, n.? 2, do C?digo Civil).<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/19606c0dd60f986080258ab4005e591c?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I &#8212; A autora, Massa Insolvente de AA, est? vinculada ao ?nus de impugnar os fundamentos da exce??o perent?ria alegada pelo r?u, na contesta??o, ?ltimo articulado admiss?vel, ?nus que deve cumprir, sob pena de preclus?o, na audi?ncia pr?via, se esta tiver lugar, ou, n?o havendo lugar a ela, no in?cio da audi?ncia final, nos termos do n.? 4 do artigo 3.? do CPC. II &#8212; N?o tendo a autora impugnado os factos que fundamentam a exce??o perent?ria de nulidade por simula??o alegada pelo r?u, quando notificada para tal pelo tribunal de 1.? inst?ncia, aqueles factos devem considerar-se provados por acordo das partes, por aplica??o dos artigos 587.?, n.? 1 e 574.?, ambos do C?digo de Processo Civil. III &#8212; A determina??o dos requisitos da simula??o, designadamente da inten??o dos contraentes e do intuito de enganar terceiros, ? mat?ria de facto, cujo apuramento ? da exclusiva compet?ncia das inst?ncias. IV ? Um neg?cio dissimulado, em que um sujeito contrata outro para servir de testa de ferro na constitui??o de uma sociedade comercial a troco de uma remunera??o ? um neg?cio celebrado com fraude ? lei (artigo 280.?, n.? 1, do C?digo Civil), ou contr?rio ? ordem p?blica e ofensivo dos bons costumes (artigo 280.?, n.? 2, do C?digo Civil).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-605061","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 481\/19.9T8LLE.C1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 481\/19.9T8LLE.C1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-23\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I - A autora, Massa Insolvente de AA, est? vinculada ao ?nus de impugnar os fundamentos da exce??o perent?ria alegada pelo r?u, na contesta??o, ?ltimo articulado admiss?vel, ?nus que deve cumprir, sob pena de preclus?o, na audi?ncia pr?via, se esta tiver lugar, ou, n?o havendo lugar a ela, no in?cio da audi?ncia final, nos termos do n.? 4 do artigo 3.? do CPC. II - N?o tendo a autora impugnado os factos que fundamentam a exce??o perent?ria de nulidade por simula??o alegada pelo r?u, quando notificada para tal pelo tribunal de 1.? inst?ncia, aqueles factos devem considerar-se provados por acordo das partes, por aplica??o dos artigos 587.?, n.? 1 e 574.?, ambos do C?digo de Processo Civil. III - A determina??o dos requisitos da simula??o, designadamente da inten??o dos contraentes e do intuito de enganar terceiros, ? mat?ria de facto, cujo apuramento ? da exclusiva compet?ncia das inst?ncias. IV ? Um neg?cio dissimulado, em que um sujeito contrata outro para servir de testa de ferro na constitui??o de uma sociedade comercial a troco de uma remunera??o ? um neg?cio celebrado com fraude ? lei (artigo 280.?, n.? 1, do C?digo Civil), ou contr?rio ? ordem p?blica e ofensivo dos bons costumes (artigo 280.?, n.? 2, do C?digo Civil).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 481\\\/19.9T8LLE.C1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-19T10:46:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 481\\\/19.9T8LLE.C1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-23\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 481\/19.9T8LLE.C1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 481\/19.9T8LLE.C1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-23","og_description":"Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I - A autora, Massa Insolvente de AA, est? vinculada ao ?nus de impugnar os fundamentos da exce??o perent?ria alegada pelo r?u, na contesta??o, ?ltimo articulado admiss?vel, ?nus que deve cumprir, sob pena de preclus?o, na audi?ncia pr?via, se esta tiver lugar, ou, n?o havendo lugar a ela, no in?cio da audi?ncia final, nos termos do n.? 4 do artigo 3.? do CPC. II - N?o tendo a autora impugnado os factos que fundamentam a exce??o perent?ria de nulidade por simula??o alegada pelo r?u, quando notificada para tal pelo tribunal de 1.? inst?ncia, aqueles factos devem considerar-se provados por acordo das partes, por aplica??o dos artigos 587.?, n.? 1 e 574.?, ambos do C?digo de Processo Civil. III - A determina??o dos requisitos da simula??o, designadamente da inten??o dos contraentes e do intuito de enganar terceiros, ? mat?ria de facto, cujo apuramento ? da exclusiva compet?ncia das inst?ncias. IV ? Um neg?cio dissimulado, em que um sujeito contrata outro para servir de testa de ferro na constitui??o de uma sociedade comercial a troco de uma remunera??o ? um neg?cio celebrado com fraude ? lei (artigo 280.?, n.? 1, do C?digo Civil), ou contr?rio ? ordem p?blica e ofensivo dos bons costumes (artigo 280.?, n.? 2, do C?digo Civil).","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 481\/19.9T8LLE.C1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-19T10:46:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-481-19-9t8lle-c1-s1-2024-01-23\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 481\/19.9T8LLE.C1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-23"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/605061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=605061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=605061"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=605061"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=605061"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=605061"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=605061"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=605061"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=605061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}