{"id":605352,"date":"2026-04-19T13:14:27","date_gmt":"2026-04-19T11:14:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/"},"modified":"2026-04-19T13:14:27","modified_gmt":"2026-04-19T11:14:27","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 20066\/22.1T8LSB-E.L1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-16"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: RICARDO COSTA. Sendo objecto da revista permitida pelo art. 14?, 1, do CIRE uma decis?o interlocut?ria com incid?ncia sobre a rela??o processual tramitada em processo de insolv?ncia, resultante da convers?o de um PEAP ? versando sobre a tempestividade da apresenta??o de ?plano de pagamentos? (arts. 249? e 251? do CIRE) ?, a admissibilidade do recurso, em sindica??o pr?via correspondente aos requisitos gerais e pr?prios da revista (por for?a do art. 17?, 1, do CIRE), limita-se ? al. b) do art. 671?, 2, do CPC (por restri??o teleol?gica), permitindo-se apenas essa impugna??o ?quando estejam em contradi??o com outro [ac?rd?o], j? transitado em julgado, proferido pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a, no dom?nio da mesma legisla??o e sobre a mesma quest?o fundamental de direito, salvo se tiver sido proferido ac?rd?o de uniformiza??o de jurisprud?ncia com ele conforme?; daqui resulta o condicionamento que tal implica para a aplica??o do conflito jurisprudencial exigido pelo art. 14?, 1, do CIRE como fundamento recursivo exclusivo das decis?es interlocut?rias impugn?veis.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/142f3c745ae000d680258aa700300c50?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: RICARDO COSTA. Sendo objecto da revista permitida pelo art. 14?, 1, do CIRE uma decis?o interlocut?ria com incid?ncia sobre a rela??o processual tramitada em processo de insolv?ncia, resultante da convers?o de um PEAP ? versando sobre a tempestividade da apresenta??o de ?plano de pagamentos? (arts. 249? e 251? do CIRE) ?, a admissibilidade do recurso, em sindica??o pr?via correspondente aos requisitos gerais e pr?prios da revista (por for?a do art. 17?, 1, do CIRE), limita-se ? al. b) do art. 671?, 2, do CPC (por restri??o teleol?gica), permitindo-se apenas essa impugna??o ?quando estejam em contradi??o com outro [ac?rd?o], j? transitado em julgado, proferido pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a, no dom?nio da mesma legisla??o e sobre a mesma quest?o fundamental de direito, salvo se tiver sido proferido ac?rd?o de uniformiza??o de jurisprud?ncia com ele conforme?; daqui resulta o condicionamento que tal implica para a aplica??o do conflito jurisprudencial exigido pelo art. 14?, 1, do CIRE como fundamento recursivo exclusivo das decis?es interlocut?rias impugn?veis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8887],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[7772,9840,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-605352","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-6-seco","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-lsb-e","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 20066\/22.1T8LSB-E.L1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 20066\/22.1T8LSB-E.L1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-16\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: RICARDO COSTA. Sendo objecto da revista permitida pelo art. 14?, 1, do CIRE uma decis?o interlocut?ria com incid?ncia sobre a rela??o processual tramitada em processo de insolv?ncia, resultante da convers?o de um PEAP ? versando sobre a tempestividade da apresenta??o de ?plano de pagamentos? (arts. 249? e 251? do CIRE) ?, a admissibilidade do recurso, em sindica??o pr?via correspondente aos requisitos gerais e pr?prios da revista (por for?a do art. 17?, 1, do CIRE), limita-se ? al. b) do art. 671?, 2, do CPC (por restri??o teleol?gica), permitindo-se apenas essa impugna??o ?quando estejam em contradi??o com outro [ac?rd?o], j? transitado em julgado, proferido pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a, no dom?nio da mesma legisla??o e sobre a mesma quest?o fundamental de direito, salvo se tiver sido proferido ac?rd?o de uniformiza??o de jurisprud?ncia com ele conforme?; daqui resulta o condicionamento que tal implica para a aplica??o do conflito jurisprudencial exigido pelo art. 14?, 1, do CIRE como fundamento recursivo exclusivo das decis?es interlocut?rias impugn?veis.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 20066\\\/22.1T8LSB-E.L1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-19T11:14:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 20066\\\/22.1T8LSB-E.L1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-16\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 20066\/22.1T8LSB-E.L1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 20066\/22.1T8LSB-E.L1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-16","og_description":"Relator: RICARDO COSTA. Sendo objecto da revista permitida pelo art. 14?, 1, do CIRE uma decis?o interlocut?ria com incid?ncia sobre a rela??o processual tramitada em processo de insolv?ncia, resultante da convers?o de um PEAP ? versando sobre a tempestividade da apresenta??o de ?plano de pagamentos? (arts. 249? e 251? do CIRE) ?, a admissibilidade do recurso, em sindica??o pr?via correspondente aos requisitos gerais e pr?prios da revista (por for?a do art. 17?, 1, do CIRE), limita-se ? al. b) do art. 671?, 2, do CPC (por restri??o teleol?gica), permitindo-se apenas essa impugna??o ?quando estejam em contradi??o com outro [ac?rd?o], j? transitado em julgado, proferido pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a, no dom?nio da mesma legisla??o e sobre a mesma quest?o fundamental de direito, salvo se tiver sido proferido ac?rd?o de uniformiza??o de jurisprud?ncia com ele conforme?; daqui resulta o condicionamento que tal implica para a aplica??o do conflito jurisprudencial exigido pelo art. 14?, 1, do CIRE como fundamento recursivo exclusivo das decis?es interlocut?rias impugn?veis.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 20066\/22.1T8LSB-E.L1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-19T11:14:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-20066-22-1t8lsb-e-l1-s1-2024-01-16\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 20066\/22.1T8LSB-E.L1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-16"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/605352","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=605352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=605352"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=605352"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=605352"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=605352"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=605352"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=605352"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=605352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}