{"id":615957,"date":"2026-04-20T03:50:20","date_gmt":"2026-04-20T01:50:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/"},"modified":"2026-04-20T03:50:20","modified_gmt":"2026-04-20T01:50:20","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 66\/22.2PAOVR-B.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ERNESTO VAZ PEREIRA. I. Al?m do mais, o Recorrente, nos termos do artigo 438?, n? 2, do CPP, deve justificar a oposi??o que origina o conflito de jurisprud?ncia. A exigida justifica??o da oposi??o se, pelo lado de vir inscrita obrigatoriamente na alega??o de recurso apresentada pelo Recorrente ? requisito formal do recurso extraordin?rio de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia, j? vista no seu conte?do material se volve em requisito substancial do mesmo recurso. II. E, por isso, n?o a justificando devida e corretamente, falece a inexist?ncia de oposi??o que se traduz outrossim na falta de verifica??o de decis?es expressas opostas, verifica??o imposta pelo artigo 437?, n? 1, do CPP. III. No caso o ac?rd?o recorrido, em termos de notifica??o ou da sua necessidade, nada decidiu. Ora, se n?o h? decis?es expressas opostas falta antagonismo que gere d?vidas e demande instrumento de uniformiza??o. IV. Na falta do requisito de oposi??o de decis?es expressas imp?e-se rejeitar o recurso por inadmissibilidade. E fica prejudicado o conhecimento do demais.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ERNESTO VAZ PEREIRA. I. Al?m do mais, o Recorrente, nos termos do artigo 438?, n? 2, do CPP, deve justificar a oposi??o que origina o conflito de jurisprud?ncia. A exigida justifica??o da oposi??o se, pelo lado de vir inscrita obrigatoriamente na alega??o de recurso apresentada pelo Recorrente ? requisito formal do recurso extraordin?rio de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia, j? vista no seu conte?do material se volve em requisito substancial do mesmo recurso. II. E, por isso, n?o a justificando devida e corretamente, falece a inexist?ncia de oposi??o que se traduz outrossim na falta de verifica??o de decis?es expressas opostas, verifica??o imposta pelo artigo 437?, n? 1, do CPP. III. No caso o ac?rd?o recorrido, em termos de notifica??o ou da sua necessidade, nada decidiu. Ora, se n?o h? decis?es expressas opostas falta antagonismo que gere d?vidas e demande instrumento de uniformiza??o. IV. Na falta do requisito de oposi??o de decis?es expressas imp?e-se rejeitar o recurso por inadmissibilidade. E fica prejudicado o conhecimento do demais.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-615957","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 66\/22.2PAOVR-B.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 66\/22.2PAOVR-B.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ERNESTO VAZ PEREIRA. I. Al?m do mais, o Recorrente, nos termos do artigo 438?, n? 2, do CPP, deve justificar a oposi??o que origina o conflito de jurisprud?ncia. A exigida justifica??o da oposi??o se, pelo lado de vir inscrita obrigatoriamente na alega??o de recurso apresentada pelo Recorrente ? requisito formal do recurso extraordin?rio de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia, j? vista no seu conte?do material se volve em requisito substancial do mesmo recurso. II. E, por isso, n?o a justificando devida e corretamente, falece a inexist?ncia de oposi??o que se traduz outrossim na falta de verifica??o de decis?es expressas opostas, verifica??o imposta pelo artigo 437?, n? 1, do CPP. III. No caso o ac?rd?o recorrido, em termos de notifica??o ou da sua necessidade, nada decidiu. Ora, se n?o h? decis?es expressas opostas falta antagonismo que gere d?vidas e demande instrumento de uniformiza??o. IV. Na falta do requisito de oposi??o de decis?es expressas imp?e-se rejeitar o recurso por inadmissibilidade. E fica prejudicado o conhecimento do demais.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 66\\\/22.2PAOVR-B.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-20T01:50:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 66\\\/22.2PAOVR-B.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 66\/22.2PAOVR-B.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 66\/22.2PAOVR-B.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11","og_description":"Relator: ERNESTO VAZ PEREIRA. I. Al?m do mais, o Recorrente, nos termos do artigo 438?, n? 2, do CPP, deve justificar a oposi??o que origina o conflito de jurisprud?ncia. A exigida justifica??o da oposi??o se, pelo lado de vir inscrita obrigatoriamente na alega??o de recurso apresentada pelo Recorrente ? requisito formal do recurso extraordin?rio de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia, j? vista no seu conte?do material se volve em requisito substancial do mesmo recurso. II. E, por isso, n?o a justificando devida e corretamente, falece a inexist?ncia de oposi??o que se traduz outrossim na falta de verifica??o de decis?es expressas opostas, verifica??o imposta pelo artigo 437?, n? 1, do CPP. III. No caso o ac?rd?o recorrido, em termos de notifica??o ou da sua necessidade, nada decidiu. Ora, se n?o h? decis?es expressas opostas falta antagonismo que gere d?vidas e demande instrumento de uniformiza??o. IV. Na falta do requisito de oposi??o de decis?es expressas imp?e-se rejeitar o recurso por inadmissibilidade. E fica prejudicado o conhecimento do demais.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 66\/22.2PAOVR-B.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-20T01:50:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-66-22-2paovr-b-p1-a-s1-2023-07-11\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 66\/22.2PAOVR-B.P1-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/615957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=615957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=615957"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=615957"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=615957"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=615957"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=615957"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=615957"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=615957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}