{"id":633599,"date":"2026-04-21T09:02:59","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T07:02:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T09:02:59","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T07:02:59","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 13006\/20.4T8LSB-A.E1-B.S1 \u2013 2023-06-20"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I — Verifica-se na pr?tica judici?ria uma frequente confus?o entre nulidade da decis?o e discord?ncia quanto ao resultado. II — Os argumentos aduzidos pela reclamante servem apenas para voltar a suscitar a mesma quest?o que j? integrou o objeto da revista e que foi indeferida — a viola??o do caso julgado — mas n?o demonstram qualquer contradi??o insan?vel entre a solu??o do caso e a sua fundamenta??o, nem qualquer obscuridade ou ambiguidade do ac?rd?o impugnado. III — N?o tendo a reclamante invocado a desconsidera??o pelo Supremo de qualquer documento dotado de for?a probat?ria plena ou outro meio de prova com semelhante efeito, como p. ex. confiss?o ou acordo das partes, e que, s? por si, implicasse for?osamente decis?o diversa, nos termos do art. 616.?, n.? 2, al. b), do CPC, mas limitando-se a re-discutir os mesmos argumentos da revista, conclui-se pelo indeferimento do pedido de reforma.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I — Verifica-se na pr?tica judici?ria uma frequente confus?o entre nulidade da decis?o e discord?ncia quanto ao resultado. II — Os argumentos aduzidos pela reclamante servem apenas para voltar a suscitar a mesma quest?o que j? integrou o objeto da revista e que foi indeferida — a viola??o do caso julgado — mas n?o demonstram qualquer contradi??o insan?vel entre a solu??o do caso e a sua fundamenta??o, nem qualquer obscuridade ou ambiguidade do ac?rd?o impugnado. III — N?o tendo a reclamante invocado a desconsidera??o pelo Supremo de qualquer documento dotado de for?a probat?ria plena ou outro meio de prova com semelhante efeito, como p. ex. confiss?o ou acordo das partes, e que, s? por si, implicasse for?osamente decis?o diversa, nos termos do art. 616.?, n.? 2, al. b), do CPC, mas limitando-se a re-discutir os mesmos argumentos da revista, conclui-se pelo indeferimento do pedido de reforma.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-633599","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 13006\/20.4T8LSB-A.E1-B.S1 \u2013 2023-06-20 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 13006\/20.4T8LSB-A.E1-B.S1 \u2013 2023-06-20\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I - Verifica-se na pr?tica judici?ria uma frequente confus?o entre nulidade da decis?o e discord?ncia quanto ao resultado. II - Os argumentos aduzidos pela reclamante servem apenas para voltar a suscitar a mesma quest?o que j? integrou o objeto da revista e que foi indeferida - a viola??o do caso julgado - mas n?o demonstram qualquer contradi??o insan?vel entre a solu??o do caso e a sua fundamenta??o, nem qualquer obscuridade ou ambiguidade do ac?rd?o impugnado. III - N?o tendo a reclamante invocado a desconsidera??o pelo Supremo de qualquer documento dotado de for?a probat?ria plena ou outro meio de prova com semelhante efeito, como p. ex. confiss?o ou acordo das partes, e que, s? por si, implicasse for?osamente decis?o diversa, nos termos do art. 616.?, n.? 2, al. b), do CPC, mas limitando-se a re-discutir os mesmos argumentos da revista, conclui-se pelo indeferimento do pedido de reforma.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 13006\\\/20.4T8LSB-A.E1-B.S1 \u2013 2023-06-20 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T07:02:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 13006\\\/20.4T8LSB-A.E1-B.S1 \u2013 2023-06-20\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 13006\/20.4T8LSB-A.E1-B.S1 \u2013 2023-06-20 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 13006\/20.4T8LSB-A.E1-B.S1 \u2013 2023-06-20","og_description":"Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I - Verifica-se na pr?tica judici?ria uma frequente confus?o entre nulidade da decis?o e discord?ncia quanto ao resultado. II - Os argumentos aduzidos pela reclamante servem apenas para voltar a suscitar a mesma quest?o que j? integrou o objeto da revista e que foi indeferida - a viola??o do caso julgado - mas n?o demonstram qualquer contradi??o insan?vel entre a solu??o do caso e a sua fundamenta??o, nem qualquer obscuridade ou ambiguidade do ac?rd?o impugnado. III - N?o tendo a reclamante invocado a desconsidera??o pelo Supremo de qualquer documento dotado de for?a probat?ria plena ou outro meio de prova com semelhante efeito, como p. ex. confiss?o ou acordo das partes, e que, s? por si, implicasse for?osamente decis?o diversa, nos termos do art. 616.?, n.? 2, al. b), do CPC, mas limitando-se a re-discutir os mesmos argumentos da revista, conclui-se pelo indeferimento do pedido de reforma.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 13006\/20.4T8LSB-A.E1-B.S1 \u2013 2023-06-20 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-21T07:02:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-13006-20-4t8lsb-a-e1-b-s1-2023-06-20\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 13006\/20.4T8LSB-A.E1-B.S1 \u2013 2023-06-20"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/633599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=633599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=633599"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=633599"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=633599"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=633599"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=633599"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=633599"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=633599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}