{"id":635963,"date":"2026-04-21T13:27:28","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T11:27:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T13:27:28","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T11:27:28","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 453\/21.3JAPDL.S1 \u2013 2023-05-31"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I -??? O recurso mant?m o arqu?tipo de ?rem?dio jur?dico? tamb?m em mat?ria de pena, n?o cabendo julgar ex novo e proferir uma nova decis?o sobre a pena, como se inexistisse a de primeira inst?ncia. II -?? Da? que o Supremo tenha vindo a considerar, na esteira da doutrina de Figueiredo Dias, que a sindicabilidade da medida concreta da pena em via de recurso abrange a determina??o da pena que desrespeite os princ?pios gerais respectivos, que desacate opera??es de determina??o impostas por lei, a indica??o e considera??o dos factores de medida da pena, mas ?n?o abranger? a determina??o, dentro daqueles par?metros, do quantum exacto de pena, excepto se tiverem sido violadas regras da experi?ncia ou se a quantifica??o se revelar de todo desproporcionada?. III — N?o se justifica a interven??o correctiva do Supremo relativamente ? pena (?nica) de 5 anos e 6 meses de pris?o aplicada a arguida autora de dois crimes de abuso sexual de crian?as agravado, mostrando-se proporcionada atendendo ?s fortes exig?ncias de preven??o geral reconhecidas no ac?rd?o, ?s expressivas exig?ncias de preven??o especial que os factos provados denunciam, pena que se considera contida na culpa da arguida, e que se enquadra no referente jurisprudencial.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I -??? O recurso mant?m o arqu?tipo de ?rem?dio jur?dico? tamb?m em mat?ria de pena, n?o cabendo julgar ex novo e proferir uma nova decis?o sobre a pena, como se inexistisse a de primeira inst?ncia. II -?? Da? que o Supremo tenha vindo a considerar, na esteira da doutrina de Figueiredo Dias, que a sindicabilidade da medida concreta da pena em via de recurso abrange a determina??o da pena que desrespeite os princ?pios gerais respectivos, que desacate opera??es de determina??o impostas por lei, a indica??o e considera??o dos factores de medida da pena, mas ?n?o abranger? a determina??o, dentro daqueles par?metros, do quantum exacto de pena, excepto se tiverem sido violadas regras da experi?ncia ou se a quantifica??o se revelar de todo desproporcionada?. III — N?o se justifica a interven??o correctiva do Supremo relativamente ? pena (?nica) de 5 anos e 6 meses de pris?o aplicada a arguida autora de dois crimes de abuso sexual de crian?as agravado, mostrando-se proporcionada atendendo ?s fortes exig?ncias de preven??o geral reconhecidas no ac?rd?o, ?s expressivas exig?ncias de preven??o especial que os factos provados denunciam, pena que se considera contida na culpa da arguida, e que se enquadra no referente jurisprudencial.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-635963","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 453\/21.3JAPDL.S1 \u2013 2023-05-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 453\/21.3JAPDL.S1 \u2013 2023-05-31\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I -??? O recurso mant?m o arqu?tipo de ?rem?dio jur?dico? tamb?m em mat?ria de pena, n?o cabendo julgar ex novo e proferir uma nova decis?o sobre a pena, como se inexistisse a de primeira inst?ncia. II -?? Da? que o Supremo tenha vindo a considerar, na esteira da doutrina de Figueiredo Dias, que a sindicabilidade da medida concreta da pena em via de recurso abrange a determina??o da pena que desrespeite os princ?pios gerais respectivos, que desacate opera??es de determina??o impostas por lei, a indica??o e considera??o dos factores de medida da pena, mas ?n?o abranger? a determina??o, dentro daqueles par?metros, do quantum exacto de pena, excepto se tiverem sido violadas regras da experi?ncia ou se a quantifica??o se revelar de todo desproporcionada?. III - N?o se justifica a interven??o correctiva do Supremo relativamente ? pena (?nica) de 5 anos e 6 meses de pris?o aplicada a arguida autora de dois crimes de abuso sexual de crian?as agravado, mostrando-se proporcionada atendendo ?s fortes exig?ncias de preven??o geral reconhecidas no ac?rd?o, ?s expressivas exig?ncias de preven??o especial que os factos provados denunciam, pena que se considera contida na culpa da arguida, e que se enquadra no referente jurisprudencial.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 453\\\/21.3JAPDL.S1 \u2013 2023-05-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T11:27:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 453\\\/21.3JAPDL.S1 \u2013 2023-05-31\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 453\/21.3JAPDL.S1 \u2013 2023-05-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 453\/21.3JAPDL.S1 \u2013 2023-05-31","og_description":"Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I -??? O recurso mant?m o arqu?tipo de ?rem?dio jur?dico? tamb?m em mat?ria de pena, n?o cabendo julgar ex novo e proferir uma nova decis?o sobre a pena, como se inexistisse a de primeira inst?ncia. II -?? Da? que o Supremo tenha vindo a considerar, na esteira da doutrina de Figueiredo Dias, que a sindicabilidade da medida concreta da pena em via de recurso abrange a determina??o da pena que desrespeite os princ?pios gerais respectivos, que desacate opera??es de determina??o impostas por lei, a indica??o e considera??o dos factores de medida da pena, mas ?n?o abranger? a determina??o, dentro daqueles par?metros, do quantum exacto de pena, excepto se tiverem sido violadas regras da experi?ncia ou se a quantifica??o se revelar de todo desproporcionada?. III - N?o se justifica a interven??o correctiva do Supremo relativamente ? pena (?nica) de 5 anos e 6 meses de pris?o aplicada a arguida autora de dois crimes de abuso sexual de crian?as agravado, mostrando-se proporcionada atendendo ?s fortes exig?ncias de preven??o geral reconhecidas no ac?rd?o, ?s expressivas exig?ncias de preven??o especial que os factos provados denunciam, pena que se considera contida na culpa da arguida, e que se enquadra no referente jurisprudencial.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 453\/21.3JAPDL.S1 \u2013 2023-05-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-21T11:27:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-453-21-3japdl-s1-2023-05-31\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 453\/21.3JAPDL.S1 \u2013 2023-05-31"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/635963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=635963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=635963"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=635963"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=635963"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=635963"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=635963"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=635963"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=635963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}