{"id":640635,"date":"2026-04-21T22:01:16","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T20:01:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T22:01:16","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T20:01:16","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1704\/21.0T8GRD.C1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-03"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I- Julgados improcedentes embargos opostos a uma execu??o, o ali executado pode, em processo posterior, vir invocar meios de defesa que podia ter invocado (e n?o invocou) nos embargos que op?s ? anterior execu??o e, a partir daqui, obter a restitui??o do pagamento que, no ?mbito da anterior execu??o, haja efetuado ao ali exequente. II- Efetivamente, n?o existe no CPC um qualquer preceito legal que estabele?a o ?nus de embargar e tal ?nus tamb?m n?o ? extra?vel, por interpreta??o, dos artigos 728.?\/1 e 2 e 732.?\/6, ambos do CPC, o que significa, n?o estando consagrado tal ?nus de embargar, que n?o ficam precludidos os fundamentos n?o invocados (e que n?o h? preclus?o decorrente da n?o dedu??o de embargos). III- O sentido do atual art. 732.?\/6 do CPC ? o de deixar claro que uma decis?o de m?rito proferida nos embargos ? dotada da for?a geral do caso julgado material em rela??o ? causa de pedir e aos fundamentos que ali foram invocados (n?o impedindo nova a??o de aprecia??o baseada em outra causa de pedir), ou seja, o caso julgado que se constitui ? restrito ? causa de pedir invocada e, em consequ?ncia, n?o h? preclus?o em rela??o ao que n?o foi invocado\/discutido nos embargos.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I- Julgados improcedentes embargos opostos a uma execu??o, o ali executado pode, em processo posterior, vir invocar meios de defesa que podia ter invocado (e n?o invocou) nos embargos que op?s ? anterior execu??o e, a partir daqui, obter a restitui??o do pagamento que, no ?mbito da anterior execu??o, haja efetuado ao ali exequente. II- Efetivamente, n?o existe no CPC um qualquer preceito legal que estabele?a o ?nus de embargar e tal ?nus tamb?m n?o ? extra?vel, por interpreta??o, dos artigos 728.?\/1 e 2 e 732.?\/6, ambos do CPC, o que significa, n?o estando consagrado tal ?nus de embargar, que n?o ficam precludidos os fundamentos n?o invocados (e que n?o h? preclus?o decorrente da n?o dedu??o de embargos). III- O sentido do atual art. 732.?\/6 do CPC ? o de deixar claro que uma decis?o de m?rito proferida nos embargos ? dotada da for?a geral do caso julgado material em rela??o ? causa de pedir e aos fundamentos que ali foram invocados (n?o impedindo nova a??o de aprecia??o baseada em outra causa de pedir), ou seja, o caso julgado que se constitui ? restrito ? causa de pedir invocada e, em consequ?ncia, n?o h? preclus?o em rela??o ao que n?o foi invocado\/discutido nos embargos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8887],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-640635","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-6-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1704\/21.0T8GRD.C1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-03 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1704\/21.0T8GRD.C1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-03\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I- Julgados improcedentes embargos opostos a uma execu??o, o ali executado pode, em processo posterior, vir invocar meios de defesa que podia ter invocado (e n?o invocou) nos embargos que op?s ? anterior execu??o e, a partir daqui, obter a restitui??o do pagamento que, no ?mbito da anterior execu??o, haja efetuado ao ali exequente. II- Efetivamente, n?o existe no CPC um qualquer preceito legal que estabele?a o ?nus de embargar e tal ?nus tamb?m n?o ? extra?vel, por interpreta??o, dos artigos 728.?\/1 e 2 e 732.?\/6, ambos do CPC, o que significa, n?o estando consagrado tal ?nus de embargar, que n?o ficam precludidos os fundamentos n?o invocados (e que n?o h? preclus?o decorrente da n?o dedu??o de embargos). III- O sentido do atual art. 732.?\/6 do CPC ? o de deixar claro que uma decis?o de m?rito proferida nos embargos ? dotada da for?a geral do caso julgado material em rela??o ? causa de pedir e aos fundamentos que ali foram invocados (n?o impedindo nova a??o de aprecia??o baseada em outra causa de pedir), ou seja, o caso julgado que se constitui ? restrito ? causa de pedir invocada e, em consequ?ncia, n?o h? preclus?o em rela??o ao que n?o foi invocado\/discutido nos embargos.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1704\\\/21.0T8GRD.C1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-03 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T20:01:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1704\\\/21.0T8GRD.C1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-03\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1704\/21.0T8GRD.C1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-03 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1704\/21.0T8GRD.C1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-03","og_description":"Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I- Julgados improcedentes embargos opostos a uma execu??o, o ali executado pode, em processo posterior, vir invocar meios de defesa que podia ter invocado (e n?o invocou) nos embargos que op?s ? anterior execu??o e, a partir daqui, obter a restitui??o do pagamento que, no ?mbito da anterior execu??o, haja efetuado ao ali exequente. II- Efetivamente, n?o existe no CPC um qualquer preceito legal que estabele?a o ?nus de embargar e tal ?nus tamb?m n?o ? extra?vel, por interpreta??o, dos artigos 728.?\/1 e 2 e 732.?\/6, ambos do CPC, o que significa, n?o estando consagrado tal ?nus de embargar, que n?o ficam precludidos os fundamentos n?o invocados (e que n?o h? preclus?o decorrente da n?o dedu??o de embargos). III- O sentido do atual art. 732.?\/6 do CPC ? o de deixar claro que uma decis?o de m?rito proferida nos embargos ? dotada da for?a geral do caso julgado material em rela??o ? causa de pedir e aos fundamentos que ali foram invocados (n?o impedindo nova a??o de aprecia??o baseada em outra causa de pedir), ou seja, o caso julgado que se constitui ? restrito ? causa de pedir invocada e, em consequ?ncia, n?o h? preclus?o em rela??o ao que n?o foi invocado\/discutido nos embargos.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1704\/21.0T8GRD.C1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-03 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-21T20:01:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1704-21-0t8grd-c1-s1-2023-05-03\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1704\/21.0T8GRD.C1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-03"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/640635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=640635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=640635"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=640635"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=640635"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=640635"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=640635"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=640635"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=640635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}