{"id":640945,"date":"2026-04-21T22:46:29","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T20:46:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T22:46:29","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T20:46:29","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1342\/19.7T8AVR.P1.S1 \u2013 2023-04-27"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Afigura-se que a interpreta??o da al?nea a) do n.? 2 do art. 640.? do CPC, que conduziu, no caso dos autos, ? rejei??o liminar do recurso da impugna??o da mat?ria de facto desrespeita o princ?pio da proporcionalidade dos ?nus, comina??es e preclus?es impostos pela lei processual, que constitui uma manifesta??o do princ?pio da proporcionalidade das restri??es, consagrado no art. 18.?, n.?s 2 e 3 da CRP, e da garantia do processo equitativo, consagrada no art. 20.?, n.? 4 da CRP. II. De acordo com a jurisprud?ncia consolidada do STJ, o n.? 1 do art. 640.? do CPC n?o exige que o apelante se pronuncie sobre a valora??o alegadamente correcta dos meios de prova por si indicados, ou seja, sobre as raz?es pelas quais cada um deles dever? conduzir a decis?o diversa da impugnada; pelo que a posi??o do tribunal a quo em rejeitar, tamb?m por este motivo, apreciar a impugna??o da decis?o relativa ? mat?ria de facto extravasa as exig?ncias legais.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Afigura-se que a interpreta??o da al?nea a) do n.? 2 do art. 640.? do CPC, que conduziu, no caso dos autos, ? rejei??o liminar do recurso da impugna??o da mat?ria de facto desrespeita o princ?pio da proporcionalidade dos ?nus, comina??es e preclus?es impostos pela lei processual, que constitui uma manifesta??o do princ?pio da proporcionalidade das restri??es, consagrado no art. 18.?, n.?s 2 e 3 da CRP, e da garantia do processo equitativo, consagrada no art. 20.?, n.? 4 da CRP. II. De acordo com a jurisprud?ncia consolidada do STJ, o n.? 1 do art. 640.? do CPC n?o exige que o apelante se pronuncie sobre a valora??o alegadamente correcta dos meios de prova por si indicados, ou seja, sobre as raz?es pelas quais cada um deles dever? conduzir a decis?o diversa da impugnada; pelo que a posi??o do tribunal a quo em rejeitar, tamb?m por este motivo, apreciar a impugna??o da decis?o relativa ? mat?ria de facto extravasa as exig?ncias legais.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8784],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-640945","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-2-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1342\/19.7T8AVR.P1.S1 \u2013 2023-04-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1342\/19.7T8AVR.P1.S1 \u2013 2023-04-27\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Afigura-se que a interpreta??o da al?nea a) do n.? 2 do art. 640.? do CPC, que conduziu, no caso dos autos, ? rejei??o liminar do recurso da impugna??o da mat?ria de facto desrespeita o princ?pio da proporcionalidade dos ?nus, comina??es e preclus?es impostos pela lei processual, que constitui uma manifesta??o do princ?pio da proporcionalidade das restri??es, consagrado no art. 18.?, n.?s 2 e 3 da CRP, e da garantia do processo equitativo, consagrada no art. 20.?, n.? 4 da CRP. II. De acordo com a jurisprud?ncia consolidada do STJ, o n.? 1 do art. 640.? do CPC n?o exige que o apelante se pronuncie sobre a valora??o alegadamente correcta dos meios de prova por si indicados, ou seja, sobre as raz?es pelas quais cada um deles dever? conduzir a decis?o diversa da impugnada; pelo que a posi??o do tribunal a quo em rejeitar, tamb?m por este motivo, apreciar a impugna??o da decis?o relativa ? mat?ria de facto extravasa as exig?ncias legais.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1342\\\/19.7T8AVR.P1.S1 \u2013 2023-04-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T20:46:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1342\\\/19.7T8AVR.P1.S1 \u2013 2023-04-27\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1342\/19.7T8AVR.P1.S1 \u2013 2023-04-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1342\/19.7T8AVR.P1.S1 \u2013 2023-04-27","og_description":"Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Afigura-se que a interpreta??o da al?nea a) do n.? 2 do art. 640.? do CPC, que conduziu, no caso dos autos, ? rejei??o liminar do recurso da impugna??o da mat?ria de facto desrespeita o princ?pio da proporcionalidade dos ?nus, comina??es e preclus?es impostos pela lei processual, que constitui uma manifesta??o do princ?pio da proporcionalidade das restri??es, consagrado no art. 18.?, n.?s 2 e 3 da CRP, e da garantia do processo equitativo, consagrada no art. 20.?, n.? 4 da CRP. II. De acordo com a jurisprud?ncia consolidada do STJ, o n.? 1 do art. 640.? do CPC n?o exige que o apelante se pronuncie sobre a valora??o alegadamente correcta dos meios de prova por si indicados, ou seja, sobre as raz?es pelas quais cada um deles dever? conduzir a decis?o diversa da impugnada; pelo que a posi??o do tribunal a quo em rejeitar, tamb?m por este motivo, apreciar a impugna??o da decis?o relativa ? mat?ria de facto extravasa as exig?ncias legais.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1342\/19.7T8AVR.P1.S1 \u2013 2023-04-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-21T20:46:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1342-19-7t8avr-p1-s1-2023-04-27\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1342\/19.7T8AVR.P1.S1 \u2013 2023-04-27"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/640945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=640945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=640945"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=640945"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=640945"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=640945"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=640945"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=640945"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=640945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}