{"id":642030,"date":"2026-04-22T00:11:30","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T22:11:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T00:11:30","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T22:11:30","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11324\/21.3T8SNT.L1.S2 \u2013 2023-04-19"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: M?RIO BELO MORGADO. I- A relev?ncia jur?dica prevista no art. 672.o, no 1, a), do CPC, pressup?e uma quest?o que apresente manifesta complexidade ou novidade, evidenciada nomeadamente em debates na doutrina e na jurisprud?ncia, e onde a resposta a dar pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a possa assumir uma dimens?o paradigm?tica para casos futuros, sendo irrelevante neste ?mbito, s? por si, o eventual desacerto da decis?o recorrida. II- N?o h? contradi??o entre o ac?rd?o recorrido, segundo o qual a jun??o do procedimento disciplinar, dentro do prazo legal, ? obrigat?ria, sendo a sua falta sancionada com a declara??o de ilicitude do despedimento, e o ac?rd?o-fundamento, que julgou que, n?o juntando o empregador algumas pe?as integrantes do procedimento disciplinar, n?o deve aplicar-se o regime sancionat?rio do art. 98.o-J, n.o 3, al?neas a) e b), do C?digo do Processo de Trabalho, quando a jun??o das pe?as em falta redundar num ato perfeitamente in?til e a jun??o parcial do procedimento disciplinar satisfizer os motivos subjacentes ? exig?ncia legal da sua jun??o ? a??o.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/4d6a5c43299360f08025899d00320570?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: M?RIO BELO MORGADO. I- A relev?ncia jur?dica prevista no art. 672.o, no 1, a), do CPC, pressup?e uma quest?o que apresente manifesta complexidade ou novidade, evidenciada nomeadamente em debates na doutrina e na jurisprud?ncia, e onde a resposta a dar pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a possa assumir uma dimens?o paradigm?tica para casos futuros, sendo irrelevante neste ?mbito, s? por si, o eventual desacerto da decis?o recorrida. II- N?o h? contradi??o entre o ac?rd?o recorrido, segundo o qual a jun??o do procedimento disciplinar, dentro do prazo legal, ? obrigat?ria, sendo a sua falta sancionada com a declara??o de ilicitude do despedimento, e o ac?rd?o-fundamento, que julgou que, n?o juntando o empregador algumas pe?as integrantes do procedimento disciplinar, n?o deve aplicar-se o regime sancionat?rio do art. 98.o-J, n.o 3, al?neas a) e b), do C?digo do Processo de Trabalho, quando a jun??o das pe?as em falta redundar num ato perfeitamente in?til e a jun??o parcial do procedimento disciplinar satisfizer os motivos subjacentes ? exig?ncia legal da sua jun??o ? a??o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7764],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-642030","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-4-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11324\/21.3T8SNT.L1.S2 \u2013 2023-04-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11324\/21.3T8SNT.L1.S2 \u2013 2023-04-19\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: M?RIO BELO MORGADO. I- A relev?ncia jur?dica prevista no art. 672.o, no 1, a), do CPC, pressup?e uma quest?o que apresente manifesta complexidade ou novidade, evidenciada nomeadamente em debates na doutrina e na jurisprud?ncia, e onde a resposta a dar pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a possa assumir uma dimens?o paradigm?tica para casos futuros, sendo irrelevante neste ?mbito, s? por si, o eventual desacerto da decis?o recorrida. II- N?o h? contradi??o entre o ac?rd?o recorrido, segundo o qual a jun??o do procedimento disciplinar, dentro do prazo legal, ? obrigat?ria, sendo a sua falta sancionada com a declara??o de ilicitude do despedimento, e o ac?rd?o-fundamento, que julgou que, n?o juntando o empregador algumas pe?as integrantes do procedimento disciplinar, n?o deve aplicar-se o regime sancionat?rio do art. 98.o-J, n.o 3, al?neas a) e b), do C?digo do Processo de Trabalho, quando a jun??o das pe?as em falta redundar num ato perfeitamente in?til e a jun??o parcial do procedimento disciplinar satisfizer os motivos subjacentes ? exig?ncia legal da sua jun??o ? a??o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11324\\\/21.3T8SNT.L1.S2 \u2013 2023-04-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T22:11:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11324\\\/21.3T8SNT.L1.S2 \u2013 2023-04-19\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11324\/21.3T8SNT.L1.S2 \u2013 2023-04-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11324\/21.3T8SNT.L1.S2 \u2013 2023-04-19","og_description":"Relator: M?RIO BELO MORGADO. I- A relev?ncia jur?dica prevista no art. 672.o, no 1, a), do CPC, pressup?e uma quest?o que apresente manifesta complexidade ou novidade, evidenciada nomeadamente em debates na doutrina e na jurisprud?ncia, e onde a resposta a dar pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a possa assumir uma dimens?o paradigm?tica para casos futuros, sendo irrelevante neste ?mbito, s? por si, o eventual desacerto da decis?o recorrida. II- N?o h? contradi??o entre o ac?rd?o recorrido, segundo o qual a jun??o do procedimento disciplinar, dentro do prazo legal, ? obrigat?ria, sendo a sua falta sancionada com a declara??o de ilicitude do despedimento, e o ac?rd?o-fundamento, que julgou que, n?o juntando o empregador algumas pe?as integrantes do procedimento disciplinar, n?o deve aplicar-se o regime sancionat?rio do art. 98.o-J, n.o 3, al?neas a) e b), do C?digo do Processo de Trabalho, quando a jun??o das pe?as em falta redundar num ato perfeitamente in?til e a jun??o parcial do procedimento disciplinar satisfizer os motivos subjacentes ? exig?ncia legal da sua jun??o ? a??o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11324\/21.3T8SNT.L1.S2 \u2013 2023-04-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-21T22:11:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11324-21-3t8snt-l1-s2-2023-04-19\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11324\/21.3T8SNT.L1.S2 \u2013 2023-04-19"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/642030","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=642030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=642030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=642030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=642030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=642030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=642030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=642030"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=642030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}