{"id":643549,"date":"2026-04-22T03:31:05","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T01:31:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T03:31:05","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T01:31:05","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1078\/20.6T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-02-28"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: JORGE ARCANJO. I &#8212; N?o ? admiss?vel recurso de revista, a coberto do art. 854.?, (2.? parte), do CPC, do ac?rd?o da Rela??o que em processo executivo aprecia uma decis?o da 1.? inst?ncia proferida ao abrigo do art. 734.? do CPC. II &#8212; O art. 629, n.? 2, al. d), deve ser interpretado restritivamente no sentido de que que o recurso de revista s? tem aplica??o ?s decis?es que ponham termo ao processo ou apreciem o m?rito da causa, nos termos do art. 671.?, n.? 1, do CPC. Contudo, para a sua aplica??o n?o basta a contradi??o de ac?rd?os, pois a norma estabelece uma recorribilidade para ac?rd?os que s?o recorr?veis nos termos gerais, e irrecorr?veis por exclus?o legal. III &#8212; N?o tendo o recorrente aquando do requerimento de interposi??o do recurso, dado cumprimento ao ?nus previsto no art. 637.?, n.? 2, do CPC, nomeadamente o de individualizar o ac?rd?o-fundamento e a jun??o da respectiva c?pia, para efeitos do art. 629.?, n.? 2, al. d), do CPC, n?o fica, a coberto do art. 655.?, n.? 1, do CPC, legitimado a suprir o ?nus que lhe impendia aquando da interposi??o da revista, pois os pressupostos formais da admissibilidade s?o os existentes no momento do requerimento de interposi??o do recurso.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/87c1ee3abcea71708025897800402afb?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: JORGE ARCANJO. I &#8212; N?o ? admiss?vel recurso de revista, a coberto do art. 854.?, (2.? parte), do CPC, do ac?rd?o da Rela??o que em processo executivo aprecia uma decis?o da 1.? inst?ncia proferida ao abrigo do art. 734.? do CPC. II &#8212; O art. 629, n.? 2, al. d), deve ser interpretado restritivamente no sentido de que que o recurso de revista s? tem aplica??o ?s decis?es que ponham termo ao processo ou apreciem o m?rito da causa, nos termos do art. 671.?, n.? 1, do CPC. Contudo, para a sua aplica??o n?o basta a contradi??o de ac?rd?os, pois a norma estabelece uma recorribilidade para ac?rd?os que s?o recorr?veis nos termos gerais, e irrecorr?veis por exclus?o legal. III &#8212; N?o tendo o recorrente aquando do requerimento de interposi??o do recurso, dado cumprimento ao ?nus previsto no art. 637.?, n.? 2, do CPC, nomeadamente o de individualizar o ac?rd?o-fundamento e a jun??o da respectiva c?pia, para efeitos do art. 629.?, n.? 2, al. d), do CPC, n?o fica, a coberto do art. 655.?, n.? 1, do CPC, legitimado a suprir o ?nus que lhe impendia aquando da interposi??o da revista, pois os pressupostos formais da admissibilidade s?o os existentes no momento do requerimento de interposi??o do recurso.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-643549","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1078\/20.6T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-02-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1078\/20.6T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-02-28\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE ARCANJO. I - N?o ? admiss?vel recurso de revista, a coberto do art. 854.?, (2.? parte), do CPC, do ac?rd?o da Rela??o que em processo executivo aprecia uma decis?o da 1.? inst?ncia proferida ao abrigo do art. 734.? do CPC. II - O art. 629, n.? 2, al. d), deve ser interpretado restritivamente no sentido de que que o recurso de revista s? tem aplica??o ?s decis?es que ponham termo ao processo ou apreciem o m?rito da causa, nos termos do art. 671.?, n.? 1, do CPC. Contudo, para a sua aplica??o n?o basta a contradi??o de ac?rd?os, pois a norma estabelece uma recorribilidade para ac?rd?os que s?o recorr?veis nos termos gerais, e irrecorr?veis por exclus?o legal. III - N?o tendo o recorrente aquando do requerimento de interposi??o do recurso, dado cumprimento ao ?nus previsto no art. 637.?, n.? 2, do CPC, nomeadamente o de individualizar o ac?rd?o-fundamento e a jun??o da respectiva c?pia, para efeitos do art. 629.?, n.? 2, al. d), do CPC, n?o fica, a coberto do art. 655.?, n.? 1, do CPC, legitimado a suprir o ?nus que lhe impendia aquando da interposi??o da revista, pois os pressupostos formais da admissibilidade s?o os existentes no momento do requerimento de interposi??o do recurso.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1078\\\/20.6T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-02-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T01:31:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1078\\\/20.6T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-02-28\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1078\/20.6T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-02-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1078\/20.6T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-02-28","og_description":"Relator: JORGE ARCANJO. I - N?o ? admiss?vel recurso de revista, a coberto do art. 854.?, (2.? parte), do CPC, do ac?rd?o da Rela??o que em processo executivo aprecia uma decis?o da 1.? inst?ncia proferida ao abrigo do art. 734.? do CPC. II - O art. 629, n.? 2, al. d), deve ser interpretado restritivamente no sentido de que que o recurso de revista s? tem aplica??o ?s decis?es que ponham termo ao processo ou apreciem o m?rito da causa, nos termos do art. 671.?, n.? 1, do CPC. Contudo, para a sua aplica??o n?o basta a contradi??o de ac?rd?os, pois a norma estabelece uma recorribilidade para ac?rd?os que s?o recorr?veis nos termos gerais, e irrecorr?veis por exclus?o legal. III - N?o tendo o recorrente aquando do requerimento de interposi??o do recurso, dado cumprimento ao ?nus previsto no art. 637.?, n.? 2, do CPC, nomeadamente o de individualizar o ac?rd?o-fundamento e a jun??o da respectiva c?pia, para efeitos do art. 629.?, n.? 2, al. d), do CPC, n?o fica, a coberto do art. 655.?, n.? 1, do CPC, legitimado a suprir o ?nus que lhe impendia aquando da interposi??o da revista, pois os pressupostos formais da admissibilidade s?o os existentes no momento do requerimento de interposi??o do recurso.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1078\/20.6T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-02-28 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T01:31:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1078-20-6t8fnc-l1-s1-2023-02-28\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1078\/20.6T8FNC.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-02-28"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/643549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=643549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=643549"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=643549"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=643549"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=643549"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=643549"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=643549"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=643549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}