{"id":646203,"date":"2026-04-22T09:29:56","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T07:29:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T09:29:56","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T07:29:56","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 19477\/16.6T8SNT-F.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-01-31"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I &#8212; N?o h? contradi??o jurisprudencial (tendo em vista a admissibilidade dum recurso de revista) entre o ac?rd?o fundamento que revogou a decis?o de rejeitar imediatamente um recurso, por as suas conclus?es serem complexas, e o ac?rd?o recorrido que, perante as conclus?es complexas do recurso, realizou a s?ntese de tais conclus?es e conheceu do objeto de tal recurso. II &#8212; Estamos, ? certo, em ambos os recursos perante conclus?es que n?o respeitam o ?nus de sintetiza??o imposto pelo art. 639.?, n.? 1, do CPC, por?m, para al?m de ambos os ac?rd?os entenderam\/decidiram, identicamente, que n?o deve proceder-se ? imediata rejei??o\/indeferimento do respetivo recurso, o ac?rd?o fundamento n?o decidiu (n?o era essa a quest?o) que perante conclus?es complexas ? sempre obrigat?rio o convite ao aperfei?oamento (e que n?o possa &#8212; apreendendo-se as quest?es\/diverg?ncias colocadas no recurso &#8212; realizar-se, como se fez no ac?rd?o recorrido, a s?ntese das conclus?es e conhecer-se de imediato do objeto de tal recurso).<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/f8fd96e67a4e19fb80258949003b5cb4?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I &#8212; N?o h? contradi??o jurisprudencial (tendo em vista a admissibilidade dum recurso de revista) entre o ac?rd?o fundamento que revogou a decis?o de rejeitar imediatamente um recurso, por as suas conclus?es serem complexas, e o ac?rd?o recorrido que, perante as conclus?es complexas do recurso, realizou a s?ntese de tais conclus?es e conheceu do objeto de tal recurso. II &#8212; Estamos, ? certo, em ambos os recursos perante conclus?es que n?o respeitam o ?nus de sintetiza??o imposto pelo art. 639.?, n.? 1, do CPC, por?m, para al?m de ambos os ac?rd?os entenderam\/decidiram, identicamente, que n?o deve proceder-se ? imediata rejei??o\/indeferimento do respetivo recurso, o ac?rd?o fundamento n?o decidiu (n?o era essa a quest?o) que perante conclus?es complexas ? sempre obrigat?rio o convite ao aperfei?oamento (e que n?o possa &#8212; apreendendo-se as quest?es\/diverg?ncias colocadas no recurso &#8212; realizar-se, como se fez no ac?rd?o recorrido, a s?ntese das conclus?es e conhecer-se de imediato do objeto de tal recurso).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":4139,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8887],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7771,29874,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-646203","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-6-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-snt-f","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 19477\/16.6T8SNT-F.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-01-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 19477\/16.6T8SNT-F.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-01-31\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I - N?o h? contradi??o jurisprudencial (tendo em vista a admissibilidade dum recurso de revista) entre o ac?rd?o fundamento que revogou a decis?o de rejeitar imediatamente um recurso, por as suas conclus?es serem complexas, e o ac?rd?o recorrido que, perante as conclus?es complexas do recurso, realizou a s?ntese de tais conclus?es e conheceu do objeto de tal recurso. II - Estamos, ? certo, em ambos os recursos perante conclus?es que n?o respeitam o ?nus de sintetiza??o imposto pelo art. 639.?, n.? 1, do CPC, por?m, para al?m de ambos os ac?rd?os entenderam\/decidiram, identicamente, que n?o deve proceder-se ? imediata rejei??o\/indeferimento do respetivo recurso, o ac?rd?o fundamento n?o decidiu (n?o era essa a quest?o) que perante conclus?es complexas ? sempre obrigat?rio o convite ao aperfei?oamento (e que n?o possa - apreendendo-se as quest?es\/diverg?ncias colocadas no recurso - realizar-se, como se fez no ac?rd?o recorrido, a s?ntese das conclus?es e conhecer-se de imediato do objeto de tal recurso).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 19477\\\/16.6T8SNT-F.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-01-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T07:29:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg\",\"width\":4000,\"height\":6000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 19477\\\/16.6T8SNT-F.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-01-31\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 19477\/16.6T8SNT-F.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-01-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 19477\/16.6T8SNT-F.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-01-31","og_description":"Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I - N?o h? contradi??o jurisprudencial (tendo em vista a admissibilidade dum recurso de revista) entre o ac?rd?o fundamento que revogou a decis?o de rejeitar imediatamente um recurso, por as suas conclus?es serem complexas, e o ac?rd?o recorrido que, perante as conclus?es complexas do recurso, realizou a s?ntese de tais conclus?es e conheceu do objeto de tal recurso. II - Estamos, ? certo, em ambos os recursos perante conclus?es que n?o respeitam o ?nus de sintetiza??o imposto pelo art. 639.?, n.? 1, do CPC, por?m, para al?m de ambos os ac?rd?os entenderam\/decidiram, identicamente, que n?o deve proceder-se ? imediata rejei??o\/indeferimento do respetivo recurso, o ac?rd?o fundamento n?o decidiu (n?o era essa a quest?o) que perante conclus?es complexas ? sempre obrigat?rio o convite ao aperfei?oamento (e que n?o possa - apreendendo-se as quest?es\/diverg?ncias colocadas no recurso - realizar-se, como se fez no ac?rd?o recorrido, a s?ntese das conclus?es e conhecer-se de imediato do objeto de tal recurso).","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 19477\/16.6T8SNT-F.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-01-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg","datePublished":"2026-04-22T07:29:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg","width":4000,"height":6000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-19477-16-6t8snt-f-l1-s1-2023-01-31\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 19477\/16.6T8SNT-F.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-01-31"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/646203","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4139"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=646203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=646203"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=646203"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=646203"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=646203"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=646203"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=646203"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=646203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}