{"id":650943,"date":"2026-04-22T19:45:48","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T17:45:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T19:45:48","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T17:45:48","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 802\/20.1 T8CLD.C1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: FERNANDO BAPTISTA. I. A decis?o proferida em ac?rd?o (de? 29.06.2021)? que, em processo de Promo??o e Protec??o, incidiu sobre uma medida cautelar provis?ria (cessa??o? de medida de acolhimento residencial), adoptada interlocutoriamente, perante um quadro indici?rio de perigo para a menor com contornos ainda mal definidos e sem elementos que apontassem para uma perspectiva de projecto de vida daquela menor, n?o faz caso julgado sobre um posterior ac?rd?o (de 26.10.2021), cuja decis?o, resultante da factualidade provada, permitiu tra?ar as linhas de constru??o do projecto de vida da menor (o afastamento da adop??o, a manuten??o dos v?nculos parentais e a medida transit?ria de acolhimento residencial com vista a futura entrega da menor aos pais biol?gicos). II. Com efeito, em tais circunst?ncias, n?o h? uma identidade f?ctico-jur?dica entre a situa??o indici?ria pressuposta pelo primeiro ac?rd?o e a situa??o resultante da factualidade provada, a final, de que se ocupou o ac?rd?o posterior; ?pelo que a efic?cia do caso julgado constitu?do pelo ac?rd?o de 29\/06\/2021, proferido em sede cautelar, provis?ria e interlocut?ria, n?o alcan?a a situa??o contemplada pelo ac?rd?o de 26\/10\/2021, n?o sendo aquela efic?cia impeditiva do veredicto neste ?ltimo prolatado, nem a t?tulo de excep??o de caso julgado nem a t?tulo de autoridade de caso julgado.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: FERNANDO BAPTISTA. I. A decis?o proferida em ac?rd?o (de? 29.06.2021)? que, em processo de Promo??o e Protec??o, incidiu sobre uma medida cautelar provis?ria (cessa??o? de medida de acolhimento residencial), adoptada interlocutoriamente, perante um quadro indici?rio de perigo para a menor com contornos ainda mal definidos e sem elementos que apontassem para uma perspectiva de projecto de vida daquela menor, n?o faz caso julgado sobre um posterior ac?rd?o (de 26.10.2021), cuja decis?o, resultante da factualidade provada, permitiu tra?ar as linhas de constru??o do projecto de vida da menor (o afastamento da adop??o, a manuten??o dos v?nculos parentais e a medida transit?ria de acolhimento residencial com vista a futura entrega da menor aos pais biol?gicos). II. Com efeito, em tais circunst?ncias, n?o h? uma identidade f?ctico-jur?dica entre a situa??o indici?ria pressuposta pelo primeiro ac?rd?o e a situa??o resultante da factualidade provada, a final, de que se ocupou o ac?rd?o posterior; ?pelo que a efic?cia do caso julgado constitu?do pelo ac?rd?o de 29\/06\/2021, proferido em sede cautelar, provis?ria e interlocut?ria, n?o alcan?a a situa??o contemplada pelo ac?rd?o de 26\/10\/2021, n?o sendo aquela efic?cia impeditiva do veredicto neste ?ltimo prolatado, nem a t?tulo de excep??o de caso julgado nem a t?tulo de autoridade de caso julgado.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8784],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-650943","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-2-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 802\/20.1 T8CLD.C1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 802\/20.1 T8CLD.C1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: FERNANDO BAPTISTA. I. A decis?o proferida em ac?rd?o (de? 29.06.2021)? que, em processo de Promo??o e Protec??o, incidiu sobre uma medida cautelar provis?ria (cessa??o? de medida de acolhimento residencial), adoptada interlocutoriamente, perante um quadro indici?rio de perigo para a menor com contornos ainda mal definidos e sem elementos que apontassem para uma perspectiva de projecto de vida daquela menor, n?o faz caso julgado sobre um posterior ac?rd?o (de 26.10.2021), cuja decis?o, resultante da factualidade provada, permitiu tra?ar as linhas de constru??o do projecto de vida da menor (o afastamento da adop??o, a manuten??o dos v?nculos parentais e a medida transit?ria de acolhimento residencial com vista a futura entrega da menor aos pais biol?gicos). II. Com efeito, em tais circunst?ncias, n?o h? uma identidade f?ctico-jur?dica entre a situa??o indici?ria pressuposta pelo primeiro ac?rd?o e a situa??o resultante da factualidade provada, a final, de que se ocupou o ac?rd?o posterior; ?pelo que a efic?cia do caso julgado constitu?do pelo ac?rd?o de 29\/06\/2021, proferido em sede cautelar, provis?ria e interlocut?ria, n?o alcan?a a situa??o contemplada pelo ac?rd?o de 26\/10\/2021, n?o sendo aquela efic?cia impeditiva do veredicto neste ?ltimo prolatado, nem a t?tulo de excep??o de caso julgado nem a t?tulo de autoridade de caso julgado.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 802\\\/20.1 T8CLD.C1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T17:45:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 802\\\/20.1 T8CLD.C1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 802\/20.1 T8CLD.C1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 802\/20.1 T8CLD.C1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15","og_description":"Relator: FERNANDO BAPTISTA. I. A decis?o proferida em ac?rd?o (de? 29.06.2021)? que, em processo de Promo??o e Protec??o, incidiu sobre uma medida cautelar provis?ria (cessa??o? de medida de acolhimento residencial), adoptada interlocutoriamente, perante um quadro indici?rio de perigo para a menor com contornos ainda mal definidos e sem elementos que apontassem para uma perspectiva de projecto de vida daquela menor, n?o faz caso julgado sobre um posterior ac?rd?o (de 26.10.2021), cuja decis?o, resultante da factualidade provada, permitiu tra?ar as linhas de constru??o do projecto de vida da menor (o afastamento da adop??o, a manuten??o dos v?nculos parentais e a medida transit?ria de acolhimento residencial com vista a futura entrega da menor aos pais biol?gicos). II. Com efeito, em tais circunst?ncias, n?o h? uma identidade f?ctico-jur?dica entre a situa??o indici?ria pressuposta pelo primeiro ac?rd?o e a situa??o resultante da factualidade provada, a final, de que se ocupou o ac?rd?o posterior; ?pelo que a efic?cia do caso julgado constitu?do pelo ac?rd?o de 29\/06\/2021, proferido em sede cautelar, provis?ria e interlocut?ria, n?o alcan?a a situa??o contemplada pelo ac?rd?o de 26\/10\/2021, n?o sendo aquela efic?cia impeditiva do veredicto neste ?ltimo prolatado, nem a t?tulo de excep??o de caso julgado nem a t?tulo de autoridade de caso julgado.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 802\/20.1 T8CLD.C1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T17:45:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-802-20-1-t8cld-c1-s1-2022-12-15\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 802\/20.1 T8CLD.C1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/650943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=650943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=650943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=650943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=650943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=650943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=650943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=650943"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=650943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}