{"id":650981,"date":"2026-04-22T19:47:00","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T17:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T19:47:00","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T17:47:00","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 276\/21.0YRPRT.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: CATARINA SERRA. I. Estando em causa, no caso sub judice, uma senten?a homologat?ria de escritura p?blica declarat?ria, n?o tem aplica??o o AUJ n.? 10\/2022, ?em que se uniformizou jurisprud?ncia relativamente a escritura p?blica declarat?ria de uni?o est?vel. II. Analisada a senten?a ? luz dos pressupostos (essencialmente formais) do artigo 980.? do CPC e n?o se vislumbrando obst?culo ? sua confirma??o, deve a senten?a ser confirmada. III. Tal confirma??o n?o confere, por?m, ? senten?a quaisquer efeitos adicionais, mantendo ela, estritamente, o valor e o alcance que lhe ? atribu?do pelo ordenamento jur?dico brasileiro. IV. O facto de, al?m do mais, a senten?a ser meramente homologat?ria refor?a a conclus?o de que esta confirma??o n?o a converte em elemento suficiente para a aquisi??o da nacionalidade portuguesa por parte dos requerentes, n?o sendo o conceito de ?uni?o est?vel? do Direito brasileiro rigorosamente equivalente ao conceito de ?uni?o de facto? do Direito portugu?s, relevante, nomeadamente, para o efeito da aplica??o do artigo 3.?, n.? 3, da Lei da Nacionalidade (Lei n.? 37\/81, de 3.10).<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: CATARINA SERRA. I. Estando em causa, no caso sub judice, uma senten?a homologat?ria de escritura p?blica declarat?ria, n?o tem aplica??o o AUJ n.? 10\/2022, ?em que se uniformizou jurisprud?ncia relativamente a escritura p?blica declarat?ria de uni?o est?vel. II. Analisada a senten?a ? luz dos pressupostos (essencialmente formais) do artigo 980.? do CPC e n?o se vislumbrando obst?culo ? sua confirma??o, deve a senten?a ser confirmada. III. Tal confirma??o n?o confere, por?m, ? senten?a quaisquer efeitos adicionais, mantendo ela, estritamente, o valor e o alcance que lhe ? atribu?do pelo ordenamento jur?dico brasileiro. IV. O facto de, al?m do mais, a senten?a ser meramente homologat?ria refor?a a conclus?o de que esta confirma??o n?o a converte em elemento suficiente para a aquisi??o da nacionalidade portuguesa por parte dos requerentes, n?o sendo o conceito de ?uni?o est?vel? do Direito brasileiro rigorosamente equivalente ao conceito de ?uni?o de facto? do Direito portugu?s, relevante, nomeadamente, para o efeito da aplica??o do artigo 3.?, n.? 3, da Lei da Nacionalidade (Lei n.? 37\/81, de 3.10).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8784],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-650981","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-2-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 276\/21.0YRPRT.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 276\/21.0YRPRT.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: CATARINA SERRA. I. Estando em causa, no caso sub judice, uma senten?a homologat?ria de escritura p?blica declarat?ria, n?o tem aplica??o o AUJ n.? 10\/2022, ?em que se uniformizou jurisprud?ncia relativamente a escritura p?blica declarat?ria de uni?o est?vel. II. Analisada a senten?a ? luz dos pressupostos (essencialmente formais) do artigo 980.? do CPC e n?o se vislumbrando obst?culo ? sua confirma??o, deve a senten?a ser confirmada. III. Tal confirma??o n?o confere, por?m, ? senten?a quaisquer efeitos adicionais, mantendo ela, estritamente, o valor e o alcance que lhe ? atribu?do pelo ordenamento jur?dico brasileiro. IV. O facto de, al?m do mais, a senten?a ser meramente homologat?ria refor?a a conclus?o de que esta confirma??o n?o a converte em elemento suficiente para a aquisi??o da nacionalidade portuguesa por parte dos requerentes, n?o sendo o conceito de ?uni?o est?vel? do Direito brasileiro rigorosamente equivalente ao conceito de ?uni?o de facto? do Direito portugu?s, relevante, nomeadamente, para o efeito da aplica??o do artigo 3.?, n.? 3, da Lei da Nacionalidade (Lei n.? 37\/81, de 3.10).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 276\\\/21.0YRPRT.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T17:47:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 276\\\/21.0YRPRT.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 276\/21.0YRPRT.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 276\/21.0YRPRT.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15","og_description":"Relator: CATARINA SERRA. I. Estando em causa, no caso sub judice, uma senten?a homologat?ria de escritura p?blica declarat?ria, n?o tem aplica??o o AUJ n.? 10\/2022, ?em que se uniformizou jurisprud?ncia relativamente a escritura p?blica declarat?ria de uni?o est?vel. II. Analisada a senten?a ? luz dos pressupostos (essencialmente formais) do artigo 980.? do CPC e n?o se vislumbrando obst?culo ? sua confirma??o, deve a senten?a ser confirmada. III. Tal confirma??o n?o confere, por?m, ? senten?a quaisquer efeitos adicionais, mantendo ela, estritamente, o valor e o alcance que lhe ? atribu?do pelo ordenamento jur?dico brasileiro. IV. O facto de, al?m do mais, a senten?a ser meramente homologat?ria refor?a a conclus?o de que esta confirma??o n?o a converte em elemento suficiente para a aquisi??o da nacionalidade portuguesa por parte dos requerentes, n?o sendo o conceito de ?uni?o est?vel? do Direito brasileiro rigorosamente equivalente ao conceito de ?uni?o de facto? do Direito portugu?s, relevante, nomeadamente, para o efeito da aplica??o do artigo 3.?, n.? 3, da Lei da Nacionalidade (Lei n.? 37\/81, de 3.10).","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 276\/21.0YRPRT.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T17:47:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-276-21-0yrprt-s1-2022-12-15-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 276\/21.0YRPRT.S1 \u2013 2022-12-15"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/650981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=650981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=650981"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=650981"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=650981"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=650981"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=650981"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=650981"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=650981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}