{"id":652011,"date":"2026-04-22T22:14:54","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T20:14:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T22:14:54","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T20:14:54","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 386\/12.4TBPTG-U.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: JORGE ARCANJO. I. O Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a apenas conhece de direito e n?o julga de facto, a n?o ser em situa??es excepcionais, conforme imp?e o art.46 da Lei n?62\/2013 de 26\/8 (?Fora dos casos previstos na lei, o Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a apenas conhece da mat?ria de direito? ), e arts.662 n?4, 674 n?3, 682 n?2 CPC. II. Por isso, relativamente aos factos, a interven??o do Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a est? limitada aos casos previstos no art.674 n?3 ( 2? parte) e 682 n?3 CPC, ofensa de uma disposi??o expressa de lei que exija certa esp?cie de prova para a exist?ncia do facto ou que fixe a for?a de determinado meio de prova ( isto ?, viola??o das regras direito probat?rio material) , reenvio do processo para amplia??o dos factos ( devido ao v?cio da insufici?ncia )ou contradi??es na decis?o da mat?ria de facto que inviabilizem a decis?o jur?dica. III. Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a n?o pode interferir no ju?zo que a Rela??o faz com base na reaprecia??o dos meios de prova sujeitos ao princ?pio da livre aprecia??o<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/d192ca751fff94b480258917003f5659?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: JORGE ARCANJO. I. O Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a apenas conhece de direito e n?o julga de facto, a n?o ser em situa??es excepcionais, conforme imp?e o art.46 da Lei n?62\/2013 de 26\/8 (?Fora dos casos previstos na lei, o Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a apenas conhece da mat?ria de direito? ), e arts.662 n?4, 674 n?3, 682 n?2 CPC. II. Por isso, relativamente aos factos, a interven??o do Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a est? limitada aos casos previstos no art.674 n?3 ( 2? parte) e 682 n?3 CPC, ofensa de uma disposi??o expressa de lei que exija certa esp?cie de prova para a exist?ncia do facto ou que fixe a for?a de determinado meio de prova ( isto ?, viola??o das regras direito probat?rio material) , reenvio do processo para amplia??o dos factos ( devido ao v?cio da insufici?ncia )ou contradi??es na decis?o da mat?ria de facto que inviabilizem a decis?o jur?dica. III. Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a n?o pode interferir no ju?zo que a Rela??o faz com base na reaprecia??o dos meios de prova sujeitos ao princ?pio da livre aprecia??o<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-652011","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 386\/12.4TBPTG-U.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 386\/12.4TBPTG-U.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE ARCANJO. I. O Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a apenas conhece de direito e n?o julga de facto, a n?o ser em situa??es excepcionais, conforme imp?e o art.46 da Lei n?62\/2013 de 26\/8 (?Fora dos casos previstos na lei, o Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a apenas conhece da mat?ria de direito? ), e arts.662 n?4, 674 n?3, 682 n?2 CPC. II. Por isso, relativamente aos factos, a interven??o do Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a est? limitada aos casos previstos no art.674 n?3 ( 2? parte) e 682 n?3 CPC, ofensa de uma disposi??o expressa de lei que exija certa esp?cie de prova para a exist?ncia do facto ou que fixe a for?a de determinado meio de prova ( isto ?, viola??o das regras direito probat?rio material) , reenvio do processo para amplia??o dos factos ( devido ao v?cio da insufici?ncia )ou contradi??es na decis?o da mat?ria de facto que inviabilizem a decis?o jur?dica. III. Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a n?o pode interferir no ju?zo que a Rela??o faz com base na reaprecia??o dos meios de prova sujeitos ao princ?pio da livre aprecia??o\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 386\\\/12.4TBPTG-U.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T20:14:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 386\\\/12.4TBPTG-U.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 386\/12.4TBPTG-U.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 386\/12.4TBPTG-U.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06","og_description":"Relator: JORGE ARCANJO. I. O Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a apenas conhece de direito e n?o julga de facto, a n?o ser em situa??es excepcionais, conforme imp?e o art.46 da Lei n?62\/2013 de 26\/8 (?Fora dos casos previstos na lei, o Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a apenas conhece da mat?ria de direito? ), e arts.662 n?4, 674 n?3, 682 n?2 CPC. II. Por isso, relativamente aos factos, a interven??o do Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a est? limitada aos casos previstos no art.674 n?3 ( 2? parte) e 682 n?3 CPC, ofensa de uma disposi??o expressa de lei que exija certa esp?cie de prova para a exist?ncia do facto ou que fixe a for?a de determinado meio de prova ( isto ?, viola??o das regras direito probat?rio material) , reenvio do processo para amplia??o dos factos ( devido ao v?cio da insufici?ncia )ou contradi??es na decis?o da mat?ria de facto que inviabilizem a decis?o jur?dica. III. Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a n?o pode interferir no ju?zo que a Rela??o faz com base na reaprecia??o dos meios de prova sujeitos ao princ?pio da livre aprecia??o","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 386\/12.4TBPTG-U.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T20:14:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-386-12-4tbptg-u-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 386\/12.4TBPTG-U.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/652011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=652011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=652011"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=652011"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=652011"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=652011"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=652011"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=652011"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=652011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}