{"id":652013,"date":"2026-04-22T22:14:59","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T20:14:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T22:14:59","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T20:14:59","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2138\/19.1T8STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: JORGE DIAS. I &#8212; Resultando da mat?ria de facto provada que o r?u, atrav?s do seu funcion?rio, ao proceder ? intermedia??o financeira n?o prestou a informa??o que ? obrigat?rio prestar, que deve ser completa, com verdade e com rigor, violou os deveres de informa??o legalmente impostos. II &#8212; Para que a informa??o deficiente\/incompleta pudesse funcionar como condi??o do preju?zo, seria necess?rio provar que, caso tivesse sido recebida informa??o completa, clara e objetiva, o autor\/investidor n?o teria subscrito a obriga??o. III &#8212; Provando-se que ?A autora, quando adquiriu as obriga??es, ficou convencida que estava a adquirir algo semelhante a um dep?sito a prazo, com capital garantido, rentabilidade assegurada e com possibilidade de mobilizar o capital. De outro modo, a autora n?o teria subscrito as obriga??es ?SLN 2006?, se soubesse que estava a comprar d?vida da Sociedade Lusa de Neg?cios, que a garantia de capital era prestada por esta entidade e n?o pelo ?BPN &#8212; Banco Portugu?s de Neg?cios, SA?, e que n?o podia mobilizar antecipada e livremente o capital?, fica demonstrado o nexo de causalidade entre o facto il?cito e o preju?zo da? resultante.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/b73fe16f787db3ee80258917003dff21?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: JORGE DIAS. I &#8212; Resultando da mat?ria de facto provada que o r?u, atrav?s do seu funcion?rio, ao proceder ? intermedia??o financeira n?o prestou a informa??o que ? obrigat?rio prestar, que deve ser completa, com verdade e com rigor, violou os deveres de informa??o legalmente impostos. II &#8212; Para que a informa??o deficiente\/incompleta pudesse funcionar como condi??o do preju?zo, seria necess?rio provar que, caso tivesse sido recebida informa??o completa, clara e objetiva, o autor\/investidor n?o teria subscrito a obriga??o. III &#8212; Provando-se que ?A autora, quando adquiriu as obriga??es, ficou convencida que estava a adquirir algo semelhante a um dep?sito a prazo, com capital garantido, rentabilidade assegurada e com possibilidade de mobilizar o capital. De outro modo, a autora n?o teria subscrito as obriga??es ?SLN 2006?, se soubesse que estava a comprar d?vida da Sociedade Lusa de Neg?cios, que a garantia de capital era prestada por esta entidade e n?o pelo ?BPN &#8212; Banco Portugu?s de Neg?cios, SA?, e que n?o podia mobilizar antecipada e livremente o capital?, fica demonstrado o nexo de causalidade entre o facto il?cito e o preju?zo da? resultante.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-652013","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2138\/19.1T8STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2138\/19.1T8STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE DIAS. I - Resultando da mat?ria de facto provada que o r?u, atrav?s do seu funcion?rio, ao proceder ? intermedia??o financeira n?o prestou a informa??o que ? obrigat?rio prestar, que deve ser completa, com verdade e com rigor, violou os deveres de informa??o legalmente impostos. II - Para que a informa??o deficiente\/incompleta pudesse funcionar como condi??o do preju?zo, seria necess?rio provar que, caso tivesse sido recebida informa??o completa, clara e objetiva, o autor\/investidor n?o teria subscrito a obriga??o. III - Provando-se que ?A autora, quando adquiriu as obriga??es, ficou convencida que estava a adquirir algo semelhante a um dep?sito a prazo, com capital garantido, rentabilidade assegurada e com possibilidade de mobilizar o capital. De outro modo, a autora n?o teria subscrito as obriga??es ?SLN 2006?, se soubesse que estava a comprar d?vida da Sociedade Lusa de Neg?cios, que a garantia de capital era prestada por esta entidade e n?o pelo ?BPN - Banco Portugu?s de Neg?cios, SA?, e que n?o podia mobilizar antecipada e livremente o capital?, fica demonstrado o nexo de causalidade entre o facto il?cito e o preju?zo da? resultante.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2138\\\/19.1T8STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T20:14:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2138\\\/19.1T8STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2138\/19.1T8STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2138\/19.1T8STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06","og_description":"Relator: JORGE DIAS. I - Resultando da mat?ria de facto provada que o r?u, atrav?s do seu funcion?rio, ao proceder ? intermedia??o financeira n?o prestou a informa??o que ? obrigat?rio prestar, que deve ser completa, com verdade e com rigor, violou os deveres de informa??o legalmente impostos. II - Para que a informa??o deficiente\/incompleta pudesse funcionar como condi??o do preju?zo, seria necess?rio provar que, caso tivesse sido recebida informa??o completa, clara e objetiva, o autor\/investidor n?o teria subscrito a obriga??o. III - Provando-se que ?A autora, quando adquiriu as obriga??es, ficou convencida que estava a adquirir algo semelhante a um dep?sito a prazo, com capital garantido, rentabilidade assegurada e com possibilidade de mobilizar o capital. De outro modo, a autora n?o teria subscrito as obriga??es ?SLN 2006?, se soubesse que estava a comprar d?vida da Sociedade Lusa de Neg?cios, que a garantia de capital era prestada por esta entidade e n?o pelo ?BPN - Banco Portugu?s de Neg?cios, SA?, e que n?o podia mobilizar antecipada e livremente o capital?, fica demonstrado o nexo de causalidade entre o facto il?cito e o preju?zo da? resultante.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2138\/19.1T8STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T20:14:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2138-19-1t8str-e1-s1-2022-12-06\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2138\/19.1T8STR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-12-06"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/652013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=652013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=652013"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=652013"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=652013"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=652013"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=652013"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=652013"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=652013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}