{"id":652883,"date":"2026-04-22T23:31:27","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T21:31:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T23:31:27","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T21:31:27","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2603\/19.0T8PDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-30"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: FERNANDO BAPTISTA. I. S? h? nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia (art? 615?, n? 1, al. d) do CPC) quando a omiss?o de conhecimento, relativamente a cada quest?o, ? absoluta e j? n?o quando seja meramente deficiente ou quando se tenham descurado as raz?es e argumentos invocados pelas partes, n?o relevando, portanto, para este efeito, as argumenta??es, raz?es ou ju?zos de valor aduzidos por aquelas em abono da sua posi??o. II. Como tal, destinando-se as nulidades da decis?o a remover aspectos de ordem formal que, eventualmente, inquinem a decis?o, n?o ? a argui??o das mesmas adequada para manifestar discord?ncia e pugnar pela altera??o do decidido, designadamente no que se reporta aos factos provados e n?o provados. III. No que tange ? mat?ria de facto, o tribunal de Revista n?o pode intervir na valora??o da prova feita pelo tribunal da Rela??o, segundo a sua livre e prudente convic??o, apenas podendo aferir se o tribunal da Rela??o observou, quer a disciplina processual aludida nos arts. 640? e 662?, n? 1, quer a an?lise cr?tica da prova nos termos ?nsitos no art. 607?, n? 4 (aplic?vel ex vi do art? 663?, n? 2, todos do CPC).<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/9ecb6c3ec5ed69878025890a005e7606?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: FERNANDO BAPTISTA. I. S? h? nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia (art? 615?, n? 1, al. d) do CPC) quando a omiss?o de conhecimento, relativamente a cada quest?o, ? absoluta e j? n?o quando seja meramente deficiente ou quando se tenham descurado as raz?es e argumentos invocados pelas partes, n?o relevando, portanto, para este efeito, as argumenta??es, raz?es ou ju?zos de valor aduzidos por aquelas em abono da sua posi??o. II. Como tal, destinando-se as nulidades da decis?o a remover aspectos de ordem formal que, eventualmente, inquinem a decis?o, n?o ? a argui??o das mesmas adequada para manifestar discord?ncia e pugnar pela altera??o do decidido, designadamente no que se reporta aos factos provados e n?o provados. III. No que tange ? mat?ria de facto, o tribunal de Revista n?o pode intervir na valora??o da prova feita pelo tribunal da Rela??o, segundo a sua livre e prudente convic??o, apenas podendo aferir se o tribunal da Rela??o observou, quer a disciplina processual aludida nos arts. 640? e 662?, n? 1, quer a an?lise cr?tica da prova nos termos ?nsitos no art. 607?, n? 4 (aplic?vel ex vi do art? 663?, n? 2, todos do CPC).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8784],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-652883","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-2-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2603\/19.0T8PDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-30 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2603\/19.0T8PDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-30\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: FERNANDO BAPTISTA. I. S? h? nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia (art? 615?, n? 1, al. d) do CPC) quando a omiss?o de conhecimento, relativamente a cada quest?o, ? absoluta e j? n?o quando seja meramente deficiente ou quando se tenham descurado as raz?es e argumentos invocados pelas partes, n?o relevando, portanto, para este efeito, as argumenta??es, raz?es ou ju?zos de valor aduzidos por aquelas em abono da sua posi??o. II. Como tal, destinando-se as nulidades da decis?o a remover aspectos de ordem formal que, eventualmente, inquinem a decis?o, n?o ? a argui??o das mesmas adequada para manifestar discord?ncia e pugnar pela altera??o do decidido, designadamente no que se reporta aos factos provados e n?o provados. III. No que tange ? mat?ria de facto, o tribunal de Revista n?o pode intervir na valora??o da prova feita pelo tribunal da Rela??o, segundo a sua livre e prudente convic??o, apenas podendo aferir se o tribunal da Rela??o observou, quer a disciplina processual aludida nos arts. 640? e 662?, n? 1, quer a an?lise cr?tica da prova nos termos ?nsitos no art. 607?, n? 4 (aplic?vel ex vi do art? 663?, n? 2, todos do CPC).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2603\\\/19.0T8PDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-30 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T21:31:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2603\\\/19.0T8PDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-30\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2603\/19.0T8PDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-30 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2603\/19.0T8PDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-30","og_description":"Relator: FERNANDO BAPTISTA. I. S? h? nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia (art? 615?, n? 1, al. d) do CPC) quando a omiss?o de conhecimento, relativamente a cada quest?o, ? absoluta e j? n?o quando seja meramente deficiente ou quando se tenham descurado as raz?es e argumentos invocados pelas partes, n?o relevando, portanto, para este efeito, as argumenta??es, raz?es ou ju?zos de valor aduzidos por aquelas em abono da sua posi??o. II. Como tal, destinando-se as nulidades da decis?o a remover aspectos de ordem formal que, eventualmente, inquinem a decis?o, n?o ? a argui??o das mesmas adequada para manifestar discord?ncia e pugnar pela altera??o do decidido, designadamente no que se reporta aos factos provados e n?o provados. III. No que tange ? mat?ria de facto, o tribunal de Revista n?o pode intervir na valora??o da prova feita pelo tribunal da Rela??o, segundo a sua livre e prudente convic??o, apenas podendo aferir se o tribunal da Rela??o observou, quer a disciplina processual aludida nos arts. 640? e 662?, n? 1, quer a an?lise cr?tica da prova nos termos ?nsitos no art. 607?, n? 4 (aplic?vel ex vi do art? 663?, n? 2, todos do CPC).","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2603\/19.0T8PDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-30 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T21:31:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2603-19-0t8pdl-l1-s1-2022-11-30\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2603\/19.0T8PDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-30"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/652883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=652883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=652883"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=652883"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=652883"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=652883"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=652883"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=652883"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=652883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}