{"id":653038,"date":"2026-04-22T23:56:37","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T21:56:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T23:56:37","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T21:56:37","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11039\/17.7T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-29"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: NUNO ATA?DE DAS NEVES. I ? Tendo a Rela??o rejeitado a Apela??o sobre a decis?o da mat?ria de facto, por incumprimento, pelo recorrente, dos ?nus ?nsitos no art. 640? n? 1 e 2 do C?digo de Processo Civil, e n?o reagindo os recorrentes, no recurso de revista que interp?em dessa decis?o, contra essa mesma rejei??o, por viola??o de norma adjectiva (art. 674? n? 3 do CPC), fica-lhe vedado, nessa mesma revista, invocar a inadmissibilidade de prova testemunhal, porquanto tal quest?o se integra e coloca no ?mbito da decis?o da mat?ria de facto que a Rela??o rejeitou conhecer e cuja decis?o transitou em julgado. II — Os meros desvios que a Rela??o faz ? senten?a em termos de jur?dico- interpretativos sobre determinada cl?usula contratual, com maior profundidade de an?lise, mas n?o se desviando da conclus?o de licitude da mesma, a que aportou a 1? inst?ncia, n?o assumem relev?ncia significativa ou bastante para que deles se possa extrair como afectada a fundamenta??o essencialmente coincidente numa e noutra decis?o, de forma a que se possa concluir que existe dupla conforme, nos termos do art. 671? n? 3 do CPC.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: NUNO ATA?DE DAS NEVES. I ? Tendo a Rela??o rejeitado a Apela??o sobre a decis?o da mat?ria de facto, por incumprimento, pelo recorrente, dos ?nus ?nsitos no art. 640? n? 1 e 2 do C?digo de Processo Civil, e n?o reagindo os recorrentes, no recurso de revista que interp?em dessa decis?o, contra essa mesma rejei??o, por viola??o de norma adjectiva (art. 674? n? 3 do CPC), fica-lhe vedado, nessa mesma revista, invocar a inadmissibilidade de prova testemunhal, porquanto tal quest?o se integra e coloca no ?mbito da decis?o da mat?ria de facto que a Rela??o rejeitou conhecer e cuja decis?o transitou em julgado. II — Os meros desvios que a Rela??o faz ? senten?a em termos de jur?dico- interpretativos sobre determinada cl?usula contratual, com maior profundidade de an?lise, mas n?o se desviando da conclus?o de licitude da mesma, a que aportou a 1? inst?ncia, n?o assumem relev?ncia significativa ou bastante para que deles se possa extrair como afectada a fundamenta??o essencialmente coincidente numa e noutra decis?o, de forma a que se possa concluir que existe dupla conforme, nos termos do art. 671? n? 3 do CPC.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8713],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-653038","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-7-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11039\/17.7T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11039\/17.7T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-29\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: NUNO ATA?DE DAS NEVES. I ? Tendo a Rela??o rejeitado a Apela??o sobre a decis?o da mat?ria de facto, por incumprimento, pelo recorrente, dos ?nus ?nsitos no art. 640? n? 1 e 2 do C?digo de Processo Civil, e n?o reagindo os recorrentes, no recurso de revista que interp?em dessa decis?o, contra essa mesma rejei??o, por viola??o de norma adjectiva (art. 674? n? 3 do CPC), fica-lhe vedado, nessa mesma revista, invocar a inadmissibilidade de prova testemunhal, porquanto tal quest?o se integra e coloca no ?mbito da decis?o da mat?ria de facto que a Rela??o rejeitou conhecer e cuja decis?o transitou em julgado. II - Os meros desvios que a Rela??o faz ? senten?a em termos de jur?dico- interpretativos sobre determinada cl?usula contratual, com maior profundidade de an?lise, mas n?o se desviando da conclus?o de licitude da mesma, a que aportou a 1? inst?ncia, n?o assumem relev?ncia significativa ou bastante para que deles se possa extrair como afectada a fundamenta??o essencialmente coincidente numa e noutra decis?o, de forma a que se possa concluir que existe dupla conforme, nos termos do art. 671? n? 3 do CPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11039\\\/17.7T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T21:56:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11039\\\/17.7T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-29\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11039\/17.7T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11039\/17.7T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-29","og_description":"Relator: NUNO ATA?DE DAS NEVES. I ? Tendo a Rela??o rejeitado a Apela??o sobre a decis?o da mat?ria de facto, por incumprimento, pelo recorrente, dos ?nus ?nsitos no art. 640? n? 1 e 2 do C?digo de Processo Civil, e n?o reagindo os recorrentes, no recurso de revista que interp?em dessa decis?o, contra essa mesma rejei??o, por viola??o de norma adjectiva (art. 674? n? 3 do CPC), fica-lhe vedado, nessa mesma revista, invocar a inadmissibilidade de prova testemunhal, porquanto tal quest?o se integra e coloca no ?mbito da decis?o da mat?ria de facto que a Rela??o rejeitou conhecer e cuja decis?o transitou em julgado. II - Os meros desvios que a Rela??o faz ? senten?a em termos de jur?dico- interpretativos sobre determinada cl?usula contratual, com maior profundidade de an?lise, mas n?o se desviando da conclus?o de licitude da mesma, a que aportou a 1? inst?ncia, n?o assumem relev?ncia significativa ou bastante para que deles se possa extrair como afectada a fundamenta??o essencialmente coincidente numa e noutra decis?o, de forma a que se possa concluir que existe dupla conforme, nos termos do art. 671? n? 3 do CPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11039\/17.7T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T21:56:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-11039-17-7t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-11-29\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 11039\/17.7T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-11-29"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/653038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=653038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=653038"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=653038"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=653038"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=653038"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=653038"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=653038"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=653038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}