{"id":653357,"date":"2026-04-23T00:45:37","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T22:45:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T00:45:37","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T22:45:37","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3624\/15.8JAPRT-G.S1 \u2013 2022-11-10"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ORLANDO GON?ALVES. I — O fundamento de revis?o a que alude a al. f), n.? 1 do art. 449.? do CPP, exige a verifica??o cumulativa de 2 pressupostos: a) que a inconstitucionalidade da norma de conte?do menos favor?vel ao arguido seja declarada pelo TC com for?a obrigat?ria geral; e b) que essa norma tenha servido de fundamento ? condena??o. II — S?o tamb?m 2 os pressupostos de revis?o enumerados na al. g), n.? 1 do art.449.?, do mesmo C?digo: a) uma senten?a proferida por uma inst?ncia internacional vinculativa do Estado Portugu?s; e b) ocorr?ncia de inconciliabilidade entre essa decis?o e a senten?a condenat?ria nacional ou de graves d?vidas sobre a sua justi?a. III — O pedido de revis?o formulado pelo condenado ao abrigo das als. f) e g), n.? 1 do art.449.? do CPP, ? manifestamente infundado, pois o visionamento de ficheiros arquivados, recolhidos e guardados por hotel nas suas c?maras de videovigil?ncia, ? mat?ria alheia ? declara??o de inconstitucionalidade do ac?rd?o n.? 268\/2022 do TC, bem como ? declara??o de invalidade da Diretiva n.? 2006\/24\/CE pelo Tribunal de Justi?a, pelo que se imp?e a condena??o do recorrente no pagamento de uma quantia entre 6 UC a 30 UC, ao abrigo do disposto no art.456.? do mesmo C?digo.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ORLANDO GON?ALVES. I — O fundamento de revis?o a que alude a al. f), n.? 1 do art. 449.? do CPP, exige a verifica??o cumulativa de 2 pressupostos: a) que a inconstitucionalidade da norma de conte?do menos favor?vel ao arguido seja declarada pelo TC com for?a obrigat?ria geral; e b) que essa norma tenha servido de fundamento ? condena??o. II — S?o tamb?m 2 os pressupostos de revis?o enumerados na al. g), n.? 1 do art.449.?, do mesmo C?digo: a) uma senten?a proferida por uma inst?ncia internacional vinculativa do Estado Portugu?s; e b) ocorr?ncia de inconciliabilidade entre essa decis?o e a senten?a condenat?ria nacional ou de graves d?vidas sobre a sua justi?a. III — O pedido de revis?o formulado pelo condenado ao abrigo das als. f) e g), n.? 1 do art.449.? do CPP, ? manifestamente infundado, pois o visionamento de ficheiros arquivados, recolhidos e guardados por hotel nas suas c?maras de videovigil?ncia, ? mat?ria alheia ? declara??o de inconstitucionalidade do ac?rd?o n.? 268\/2022 do TC, bem como ? declara??o de invalidade da Diretiva n.? 2006\/24\/CE pelo Tribunal de Justi?a, pelo que se imp?e a condena??o do recorrente no pagamento de uma quantia entre 6 UC a 30 UC, ao abrigo do disposto no art.456.? do mesmo C?digo.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[7772,32882,7774,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-653357","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-japrt-g","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3624\/15.8JAPRT-G.S1 \u2013 2022-11-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3624\/15.8JAPRT-G.S1 \u2013 2022-11-10\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ORLANDO GON?ALVES. I - O fundamento de revis?o a que alude a al. f), n.? 1 do art. 449.? do CPP, exige a verifica??o cumulativa de 2 pressupostos: a) que a inconstitucionalidade da norma de conte?do menos favor?vel ao arguido seja declarada pelo TC com for?a obrigat?ria geral; e b) que essa norma tenha servido de fundamento ? condena??o. II - S?o tamb?m 2 os pressupostos de revis?o enumerados na al. g), n.? 1 do art.449.?, do mesmo C?digo: a) uma senten?a proferida por uma inst?ncia internacional vinculativa do Estado Portugu?s; e b) ocorr?ncia de inconciliabilidade entre essa decis?o e a senten?a condenat?ria nacional ou de graves d?vidas sobre a sua justi?a. III - O pedido de revis?o formulado pelo condenado ao abrigo das als. f) e g), n.? 1 do art.449.? do CPP, ? manifestamente infundado, pois o visionamento de ficheiros arquivados, recolhidos e guardados por hotel nas suas c?maras de videovigil?ncia, ? mat?ria alheia ? declara??o de inconstitucionalidade do ac?rd?o n.? 268\/2022 do TC, bem como ? declara??o de invalidade da Diretiva n.? 2006\/24\/CE pelo Tribunal de Justi?a, pelo que se imp?e a condena??o do recorrente no pagamento de uma quantia entre 6 UC a 30 UC, ao abrigo do disposto no art.456.? do mesmo C?digo.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3624\\\/15.8JAPRT-G.S1 \u2013 2022-11-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T22:45:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3624\\\/15.8JAPRT-G.S1 \u2013 2022-11-10\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3624\/15.8JAPRT-G.S1 \u2013 2022-11-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3624\/15.8JAPRT-G.S1 \u2013 2022-11-10","og_description":"Relator: ORLANDO GON?ALVES. I - O fundamento de revis?o a que alude a al. f), n.? 1 do art. 449.? do CPP, exige a verifica??o cumulativa de 2 pressupostos: a) que a inconstitucionalidade da norma de conte?do menos favor?vel ao arguido seja declarada pelo TC com for?a obrigat?ria geral; e b) que essa norma tenha servido de fundamento ? condena??o. II - S?o tamb?m 2 os pressupostos de revis?o enumerados na al. g), n.? 1 do art.449.?, do mesmo C?digo: a) uma senten?a proferida por uma inst?ncia internacional vinculativa do Estado Portugu?s; e b) ocorr?ncia de inconciliabilidade entre essa decis?o e a senten?a condenat?ria nacional ou de graves d?vidas sobre a sua justi?a. III - O pedido de revis?o formulado pelo condenado ao abrigo das als. f) e g), n.? 1 do art.449.? do CPP, ? manifestamente infundado, pois o visionamento de ficheiros arquivados, recolhidos e guardados por hotel nas suas c?maras de videovigil?ncia, ? mat?ria alheia ? declara??o de inconstitucionalidade do ac?rd?o n.? 268\/2022 do TC, bem como ? declara??o de invalidade da Diretiva n.? 2006\/24\/CE pelo Tribunal de Justi?a, pelo que se imp?e a condena??o do recorrente no pagamento de uma quantia entre 6 UC a 30 UC, ao abrigo do disposto no art.456.? do mesmo C?digo.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3624\/15.8JAPRT-G.S1 \u2013 2022-11-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T22:45:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3624-15-8japrt-g-s1-2022-11-10\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3624\/15.8JAPRT-G.S1 \u2013 2022-11-10"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/653357","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=653357"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=653357"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=653357"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=653357"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=653357"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=653357"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=653357"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=653357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}