{"id":654482,"date":"2026-04-23T03:34:35","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T01:34:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T03:34:35","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T01:34:35","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 721\/18.1T8BRG.G2.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: PEDRO DE LIMA GON?ALVES. I — O Tribunal da Rela??o pode apreciar se a factualidade indicada pelos recorrentes ? ou n?o relevante para a decis?o da causa, sendo-lhe l?cito, no caso de concluir pela sua irrelev?ncia, deixar de apreciar, nessa parte, a impugna??o da mat?ria de facto por tal se prefigurar como um ato in?til. II — O patrim?nio comum ? respons?vel pelas d?vidas comuns e s? depois pelas d?vidas pr?prias de cada um dos c?njuges (artigo 1689.?, n.?2, do C?digo Civil). III — Os bens do devedor respondem pelas suas d?vidas (artigo 601.? do C?digo Civil) e da livre disponibilidade dos bens (com consagra??o expressa no artigo 62.?, n.?1, da Constitui??o da Rep?blica Portuguesa), uma vez que est?o em jogo interesses de terceiros (com relevo para a propriedade e a autonomia privada), entendeu o legislador, em desvio ?quelas regras, sujeitar o terceiro ? impugna??o pauliana, mas s? o fazendo com um fundamento s?rio, relacionado com a viola??o de princ?pios fundamentais da ordem jur?dica (?in casu?, a boa-f?).<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: PEDRO DE LIMA GON?ALVES. I — O Tribunal da Rela??o pode apreciar se a factualidade indicada pelos recorrentes ? ou n?o relevante para a decis?o da causa, sendo-lhe l?cito, no caso de concluir pela sua irrelev?ncia, deixar de apreciar, nessa parte, a impugna??o da mat?ria de facto por tal se prefigurar como um ato in?til. II — O patrim?nio comum ? respons?vel pelas d?vidas comuns e s? depois pelas d?vidas pr?prias de cada um dos c?njuges (artigo 1689.?, n.?2, do C?digo Civil). III — Os bens do devedor respondem pelas suas d?vidas (artigo 601.? do C?digo Civil) e da livre disponibilidade dos bens (com consagra??o expressa no artigo 62.?, n.?1, da Constitui??o da Rep?blica Portuguesa), uma vez que est?o em jogo interesses de terceiros (com relevo para a propriedade e a autonomia privada), entendeu o legislador, em desvio ?quelas regras, sujeitar o terceiro ? impugna??o pauliana, mas s? o fazendo com um fundamento s?rio, relacionado com a viola??o de princ?pios fundamentais da ordem jur?dica (?in casu?, a boa-f?).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-654482","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 721\/18.1T8BRG.G2.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 721\/18.1T8BRG.G2.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PEDRO DE LIMA GON?ALVES. I - O Tribunal da Rela??o pode apreciar se a factualidade indicada pelos recorrentes ? ou n?o relevante para a decis?o da causa, sendo-lhe l?cito, no caso de concluir pela sua irrelev?ncia, deixar de apreciar, nessa parte, a impugna??o da mat?ria de facto por tal se prefigurar como um ato in?til. II - O patrim?nio comum ? respons?vel pelas d?vidas comuns e s? depois pelas d?vidas pr?prias de cada um dos c?njuges (artigo 1689.?, n.?2, do C?digo Civil). III - Os bens do devedor respondem pelas suas d?vidas (artigo 601.? do C?digo Civil) e da livre disponibilidade dos bens (com consagra??o expressa no artigo 62.?, n.?1, da Constitui??o da Rep?blica Portuguesa), uma vez que est?o em jogo interesses de terceiros (com relevo para a propriedade e a autonomia privada), entendeu o legislador, em desvio ?quelas regras, sujeitar o terceiro ? impugna??o pauliana, mas s? o fazendo com um fundamento s?rio, relacionado com a viola??o de princ?pios fundamentais da ordem jur?dica (?in casu?, a boa-f?).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 721\\\/18.1T8BRG.G2.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T01:34:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 721\\\/18.1T8BRG.G2.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 721\/18.1T8BRG.G2.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 721\/18.1T8BRG.G2.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25","og_description":"Relator: PEDRO DE LIMA GON?ALVES. I - O Tribunal da Rela??o pode apreciar se a factualidade indicada pelos recorrentes ? ou n?o relevante para a decis?o da causa, sendo-lhe l?cito, no caso de concluir pela sua irrelev?ncia, deixar de apreciar, nessa parte, a impugna??o da mat?ria de facto por tal se prefigurar como um ato in?til. II - O patrim?nio comum ? respons?vel pelas d?vidas comuns e s? depois pelas d?vidas pr?prias de cada um dos c?njuges (artigo 1689.?, n.?2, do C?digo Civil). III - Os bens do devedor respondem pelas suas d?vidas (artigo 601.? do C?digo Civil) e da livre disponibilidade dos bens (com consagra??o expressa no artigo 62.?, n.?1, da Constitui??o da Rep?blica Portuguesa), uma vez que est?o em jogo interesses de terceiros (com relevo para a propriedade e a autonomia privada), entendeu o legislador, em desvio ?quelas regras, sujeitar o terceiro ? impugna??o pauliana, mas s? o fazendo com um fundamento s?rio, relacionado com a viola??o de princ?pios fundamentais da ordem jur?dica (?in casu?, a boa-f?).","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 721\/18.1T8BRG.G2.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T01:34:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-721-18-1t8brg-g2-s1-2022-10-25-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 721\/18.1T8BRG.G2.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/654482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=654482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=654482"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=654482"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=654482"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=654482"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=654482"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=654482"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=654482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}