{"id":654484,"date":"2026-04-23T03:34:39","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T01:34:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T03:34:39","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T01:34:39","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 26\/22.3YFLSB.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I ? Das decis?es singulares proferidas no ?mbito da compet?ncia da sec??o de contencioso do STJ ? n?o podendo haver recurso, por a sec??o de contencioso ser uma inst?ncia jurisdicional ?nica? cabe reclama??o para o Pleno da sec??o de contencioso. II ? Para que ocorram viola??es dos ?direitos e interesses que lhe cumpra defender?, com o sentido referido no art. 55.?, n.? 1, al. c), do CPTA, n?o basta a entidade p?blica (Ordem dos Advogados) invocar genericamente que a delibera??o do CSM impugnada viola os direitos, liberdades e garantias dos cidad?os e\/ou que a delibera??o do CSM impugnada ?causa e causar? preju?zos de diversa natureza, que contendem, n?o s? com a dignidade e o exerc?cio da profiss?o de advogado, como tamb?m, em virtude dos obst?culos criados ao exerc?cio dessas fun??es, preju?zos irrecuper?veis ao n?vel dos direitos dos arguidos?. III — O preciso alcance da legitimidade ativa conferida pela al. c) do art. 55.?, n.? 1, do CPTA tem que ser aferido em cada caso concreto, em fun??o da rela??o de congru?ncia entre os efeitos do ato a impugnar e as finalidades program?ticas da entidade impugnante.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I ? Das decis?es singulares proferidas no ?mbito da compet?ncia da sec??o de contencioso do STJ ? n?o podendo haver recurso, por a sec??o de contencioso ser uma inst?ncia jurisdicional ?nica? cabe reclama??o para o Pleno da sec??o de contencioso. II ? Para que ocorram viola??es dos ?direitos e interesses que lhe cumpra defender?, com o sentido referido no art. 55.?, n.? 1, al. c), do CPTA, n?o basta a entidade p?blica (Ordem dos Advogados) invocar genericamente que a delibera??o do CSM impugnada viola os direitos, liberdades e garantias dos cidad?os e\/ou que a delibera??o do CSM impugnada ?causa e causar? preju?zos de diversa natureza, que contendem, n?o s? com a dignidade e o exerc?cio da profiss?o de advogado, como tamb?m, em virtude dos obst?culos criados ao exerc?cio dessas fun??es, preju?zos irrecuper?veis ao n?vel dos direitos dos arguidos?. III — O preciso alcance da legitimidade ativa conferida pela al. c) do art. 55.?, n.? 1, do CPTA tem que ser aferido em cada caso concreto, em fun??o da rela??o de congru?ncia entre os efeitos do ato a impugnar e as finalidades program?ticas da entidade impugnante.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[10055],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-654484","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-seco-do-contencioso","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 26\/22.3YFLSB.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 26\/22.3YFLSB.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I ? Das decis?es singulares proferidas no ?mbito da compet?ncia da sec??o de contencioso do STJ ? n?o podendo haver recurso, por a sec??o de contencioso ser uma inst?ncia jurisdicional ?nica? cabe reclama??o para o Pleno da sec??o de contencioso. II ? Para que ocorram viola??es dos ?direitos e interesses que lhe cumpra defender?, com o sentido referido no art. 55.?, n.? 1, al. c), do CPTA, n?o basta a entidade p?blica (Ordem dos Advogados) invocar genericamente que a delibera??o do CSM impugnada viola os direitos, liberdades e garantias dos cidad?os e\/ou que a delibera??o do CSM impugnada ?causa e causar? preju?zos de diversa natureza, que contendem, n?o s? com a dignidade e o exerc?cio da profiss?o de advogado, como tamb?m, em virtude dos obst?culos criados ao exerc?cio dessas fun??es, preju?zos irrecuper?veis ao n?vel dos direitos dos arguidos?. III - O preciso alcance da legitimidade ativa conferida pela al. c) do art. 55.?, n.? 1, do CPTA tem que ser aferido em cada caso concreto, em fun??o da rela??o de congru?ncia entre os efeitos do ato a impugnar e as finalidades program?ticas da entidade impugnante.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 26\\\/22.3YFLSB.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T01:34:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 26\\\/22.3YFLSB.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 26\/22.3YFLSB.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 26\/22.3YFLSB.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25","og_description":"Relator: ANT?NIO BARATEIRO MARTINS. I ? Das decis?es singulares proferidas no ?mbito da compet?ncia da sec??o de contencioso do STJ ? n?o podendo haver recurso, por a sec??o de contencioso ser uma inst?ncia jurisdicional ?nica? cabe reclama??o para o Pleno da sec??o de contencioso. II ? Para que ocorram viola??es dos ?direitos e interesses que lhe cumpra defender?, com o sentido referido no art. 55.?, n.? 1, al. c), do CPTA, n?o basta a entidade p?blica (Ordem dos Advogados) invocar genericamente que a delibera??o do CSM impugnada viola os direitos, liberdades e garantias dos cidad?os e\/ou que a delibera??o do CSM impugnada ?causa e causar? preju?zos de diversa natureza, que contendem, n?o s? com a dignidade e o exerc?cio da profiss?o de advogado, como tamb?m, em virtude dos obst?culos criados ao exerc?cio dessas fun??es, preju?zos irrecuper?veis ao n?vel dos direitos dos arguidos?. III - O preciso alcance da legitimidade ativa conferida pela al. c) do art. 55.?, n.? 1, do CPTA tem que ser aferido em cada caso concreto, em fun??o da rela??o de congru?ncia entre os efeitos do ato a impugnar e as finalidades program?ticas da entidade impugnante.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 26\/22.3YFLSB.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T01:34:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-26-22-3yflsb-s1-2022-10-25-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 26\/22.3YFLSB.S1 \u2013 2022-10-25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/654484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=654484"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=654484"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=654484"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=654484"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=654484"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=654484"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=654484"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=654484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}