{"id":655949,"date":"2026-04-23T06:31:28","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T04:31:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T06:31:28","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T04:31:28","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3347\/19.9T8BRR.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-10-12"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- Tendo a rela??o entre as partes tido in?cio em 1 de Setembro de 2003 ? inaplic?vel a presun??o de laboralidade contida no artigo 12? do C?digo do Trabalho, pelo que h? que recorrer ao m?todo indici?rio ou tipol?gico a fim de se aferir se entre as partes vigorou um contrato de trabalho ou um contrato de presta??o de servi?o; II- Nestes casos incumbe ao trabalhador, nos termos do art? 342?, n.?1, do C?digo Civil, provar os factos que permitam concluir que a sua presta??o foi executada em regime de subordina??o jur?dica; III. Existindo ind?cios, como sejam o pagamento ? hora e em fun??o da natureza do trabalho efectuado, e se o mesmo existisse, a n?o necessidade de justificar as aus?ncias do Autor, a n?o demonstra??o de sujei??o a hor?rio de trabalho e ao poder disciplinar da R?, que n?o permitem estabelecer, com a necess?ria seguran?a e certeza, que o Autor exerceu a sua actividade sob a autoridade, direc??o e fiscaliza??o da R?, deve-se ?considerar que o primeiro n?o logrou provar que estava ligada ? segunda por contrato de trabalho.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- Tendo a rela??o entre as partes tido in?cio em 1 de Setembro de 2003 ? inaplic?vel a presun??o de laboralidade contida no artigo 12? do C?digo do Trabalho, pelo que h? que recorrer ao m?todo indici?rio ou tipol?gico a fim de se aferir se entre as partes vigorou um contrato de trabalho ou um contrato de presta??o de servi?o; II- Nestes casos incumbe ao trabalhador, nos termos do art? 342?, n.?1, do C?digo Civil, provar os factos que permitam concluir que a sua presta??o foi executada em regime de subordina??o jur?dica; III. Existindo ind?cios, como sejam o pagamento ? hora e em fun??o da natureza do trabalho efectuado, e se o mesmo existisse, a n?o necessidade de justificar as aus?ncias do Autor, a n?o demonstra??o de sujei??o a hor?rio de trabalho e ao poder disciplinar da R?, que n?o permitem estabelecer, com a necess?ria seguran?a e certeza, que o Autor exerceu a sua actividade sob a autoridade, direc??o e fiscaliza??o da R?, deve-se ?considerar que o primeiro n?o logrou provar que estava ligada ? segunda por contrato de trabalho.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7764],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-655949","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-4-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3347\/19.9T8BRR.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-10-12 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3347\/19.9T8BRR.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-10-12\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- Tendo a rela??o entre as partes tido in?cio em 1 de Setembro de 2003 ? inaplic?vel a presun??o de laboralidade contida no artigo 12? do C?digo do Trabalho, pelo que h? que recorrer ao m?todo indici?rio ou tipol?gico a fim de se aferir se entre as partes vigorou um contrato de trabalho ou um contrato de presta??o de servi?o; II- Nestes casos incumbe ao trabalhador, nos termos do art? 342?, n.?1, do C?digo Civil, provar os factos que permitam concluir que a sua presta??o foi executada em regime de subordina??o jur?dica; III. Existindo ind?cios, como sejam o pagamento ? hora e em fun??o da natureza do trabalho efectuado, e se o mesmo existisse, a n?o necessidade de justificar as aus?ncias do Autor, a n?o demonstra??o de sujei??o a hor?rio de trabalho e ao poder disciplinar da R?, que n?o permitem estabelecer, com a necess?ria seguran?a e certeza, que o Autor exerceu a sua actividade sob a autoridade, direc??o e fiscaliza??o da R?, deve-se ?considerar que o primeiro n?o logrou provar que estava ligada ? segunda por contrato de trabalho.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3347\\\/19.9T8BRR.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-10-12 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T04:31:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3347\\\/19.9T8BRR.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-10-12\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3347\/19.9T8BRR.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-10-12 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3347\/19.9T8BRR.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-10-12","og_description":"Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- Tendo a rela??o entre as partes tido in?cio em 1 de Setembro de 2003 ? inaplic?vel a presun??o de laboralidade contida no artigo 12? do C?digo do Trabalho, pelo que h? que recorrer ao m?todo indici?rio ou tipol?gico a fim de se aferir se entre as partes vigorou um contrato de trabalho ou um contrato de presta??o de servi?o; II- Nestes casos incumbe ao trabalhador, nos termos do art? 342?, n.?1, do C?digo Civil, provar os factos que permitam concluir que a sua presta??o foi executada em regime de subordina??o jur?dica; III. Existindo ind?cios, como sejam o pagamento ? hora e em fun??o da natureza do trabalho efectuado, e se o mesmo existisse, a n?o necessidade de justificar as aus?ncias do Autor, a n?o demonstra??o de sujei??o a hor?rio de trabalho e ao poder disciplinar da R?, que n?o permitem estabelecer, com a necess?ria seguran?a e certeza, que o Autor exerceu a sua actividade sob a autoridade, direc??o e fiscaliza??o da R?, deve-se ?considerar que o primeiro n?o logrou provar que estava ligada ? segunda por contrato de trabalho.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3347\/19.9T8BRR.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-10-12 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T04:31:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3347-19-9t8brr-l1-s1-2022-10-12\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3347\/19.9T8BRR.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-10-12"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/655949","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=655949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=655949"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=655949"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=655949"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=655949"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=655949"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=655949"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=655949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}