{"id":658523,"date":"2026-04-23T11:44:33","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T09:44:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T11:44:33","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T09:44:33","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2641\/20.0T8BRG.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-21"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I — No ?mbito do conhecimento da mat?ria de facto, a interven??o do STJ ? residual e limitada ? aprecia??o da observ?ncia das regras de direito probat?rio nos termos dos arts. 674.?, n.? 3 e 682.?, n.? 2, do C.P.C. II — ? insuscet?vel de controlo pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a a altera??o da mat?ria de facto pelo Tribunal da Rela??o suportada em prova sujeita ? livre aprecia??o, n?o impondo a lei determinada esp?cie de prova para a exist?ncia do facto. III — Na celebra??o de contrato a termo, a indica??o do motivo justificativo do termo deve ser feita com men??o expressa dos factos que o integram, devendo estabelecer-se a rela??o entre a justifica??o invocada e o termo estipulado (art. 141.? n.? 3, do C?digo do Trabalho). IV — A afirma??o de que n?o ? poss?vel determinar a dura??o do aumento excecional da atividade ? insuficiente para estabelecer a rela??o entre a justifica??o invocada e o termo incerto estipulado, o que acarreta a nulidade deste.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I — No ?mbito do conhecimento da mat?ria de facto, a interven??o do STJ ? residual e limitada ? aprecia??o da observ?ncia das regras de direito probat?rio nos termos dos arts. 674.?, n.? 3 e 682.?, n.? 2, do C.P.C. II — ? insuscet?vel de controlo pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a a altera??o da mat?ria de facto pelo Tribunal da Rela??o suportada em prova sujeita ? livre aprecia??o, n?o impondo a lei determinada esp?cie de prova para a exist?ncia do facto. III — Na celebra??o de contrato a termo, a indica??o do motivo justificativo do termo deve ser feita com men??o expressa dos factos que o integram, devendo estabelecer-se a rela??o entre a justifica??o invocada e o termo estipulado (art. 141.? n.? 3, do C?digo do Trabalho). IV — A afirma??o de que n?o ? poss?vel determinar a dura??o do aumento excecional da atividade ? insuficiente para estabelecer a rela??o entre a justifica??o invocada e o termo incerto estipulado, o que acarreta a nulidade deste.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7764],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-658523","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-4-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2641\/20.0T8BRG.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2641\/20.0T8BRG.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-21\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I - No ?mbito do conhecimento da mat?ria de facto, a interven??o do STJ ? residual e limitada ? aprecia??o da observ?ncia das regras de direito probat?rio nos termos dos arts. 674.?, n.? 3 e 682.?, n.? 2, do C.P.C. II - ? insuscet?vel de controlo pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a a altera??o da mat?ria de facto pelo Tribunal da Rela??o suportada em prova sujeita ? livre aprecia??o, n?o impondo a lei determinada esp?cie de prova para a exist?ncia do facto. III - Na celebra??o de contrato a termo, a indica??o do motivo justificativo do termo deve ser feita com men??o expressa dos factos que o integram, devendo estabelecer-se a rela??o entre a justifica??o invocada e o termo estipulado (art. 141.? n.? 3, do C?digo do Trabalho). IV - A afirma??o de que n?o ? poss?vel determinar a dura??o do aumento excecional da atividade ? insuficiente para estabelecer a rela??o entre a justifica??o invocada e o termo incerto estipulado, o que acarreta a nulidade deste.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2641\\\/20.0T8BRG.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T09:44:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2641\\\/20.0T8BRG.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-21\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2641\/20.0T8BRG.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2641\/20.0T8BRG.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-21","og_description":"Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I - No ?mbito do conhecimento da mat?ria de facto, a interven??o do STJ ? residual e limitada ? aprecia??o da observ?ncia das regras de direito probat?rio nos termos dos arts. 674.?, n.? 3 e 682.?, n.? 2, do C.P.C. II - ? insuscet?vel de controlo pelo Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a a altera??o da mat?ria de facto pelo Tribunal da Rela??o suportada em prova sujeita ? livre aprecia??o, n?o impondo a lei determinada esp?cie de prova para a exist?ncia do facto. III - Na celebra??o de contrato a termo, a indica??o do motivo justificativo do termo deve ser feita com men??o expressa dos factos que o integram, devendo estabelecer-se a rela??o entre a justifica??o invocada e o termo estipulado (art. 141.? n.? 3, do C?digo do Trabalho). IV - A afirma??o de que n?o ? poss?vel determinar a dura??o do aumento excecional da atividade ? insuficiente para estabelecer a rela??o entre a justifica??o invocada e o termo incerto estipulado, o que acarreta a nulidade deste.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2641\/20.0T8BRG.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T09:44:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2641-20-0t8brg-g1-s1-2022-09-21\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2641\/20.0T8BRG.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-21"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/658523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=658523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=658523"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=658523"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=658523"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=658523"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=658523"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=658523"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=658523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}