{"id":659295,"date":"2026-04-23T13:06:31","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T11:06:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T13:06:31","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T11:06:31","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 203\/22.7GDMFR-A.S1 \u2013 2022-09-08"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: CID GERALDO. I &#8212; Estando o arguido indiciado pela pr?tica de um crime de viol?ncia dom?stica agravado, p. e p. pelo art. 152.?, n.os l, al. b), 2, al. a), do CP, pun?vel com pena de pris?o de 2 a 5 anos, o prazo m?ximo de dura??o da medida de coac??o de pris?o preventiva, n?o ? de 4 meses, mas sim de 6 meses [art. 215.?, n.os l, al a) e 2, do CPP]. II &#8212; Encontrando-se o arguido sujeito ? medida de coac??o de pris?o preventiva, desde 25.4.2022 (despacho judicial de fls, 57 e ss.), tendo sido detido em 24-04-2022 (cfr. fls. 6), n?o se mostra excedido o prazo m?ximo de pris?o preventiva. III &#8212; Resultando claro que a pris?o do requerente n?o se mant?m para al?m do prazo fixado pela lei, e considerando que, nos presentes autos, a pris?o preventiva do arguido\/requerente foi ordenada por um juiz no ?mbito das suas atribui??es e com compet?ncia para ordenar a pris?o preventiva de arguido e que a pris?o preventiva foi decretada com fundamento na pr?tica de um crime que admite pris?o preventiva, conclui-se pelo indeferimento do habeas corpus em apre?o, por falta de fundamento bastante ? art. 223.?, n.? 4, al. a), do CPP.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/a3901f7b25ae867b802588b8002e1fe2?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: CID GERALDO. I &#8212; Estando o arguido indiciado pela pr?tica de um crime de viol?ncia dom?stica agravado, p. e p. pelo art. 152.?, n.os l, al. b), 2, al. a), do CP, pun?vel com pena de pris?o de 2 a 5 anos, o prazo m?ximo de dura??o da medida de coac??o de pris?o preventiva, n?o ? de 4 meses, mas sim de 6 meses [art. 215.?, n.os l, al a) e 2, do CPP]. II &#8212; Encontrando-se o arguido sujeito ? medida de coac??o de pris?o preventiva, desde 25.4.2022 (despacho judicial de fls, 57 e ss.), tendo sido detido em 24-04-2022 (cfr. fls. 6), n?o se mostra excedido o prazo m?ximo de pris?o preventiva. III &#8212; Resultando claro que a pris?o do requerente n?o se mant?m para al?m do prazo fixado pela lei, e considerando que, nos presentes autos, a pris?o preventiva do arguido\/requerente foi ordenada por um juiz no ?mbito das suas atribui??es e com compet?ncia para ordenar a pris?o preventiva de arguido e que a pris?o preventiva foi decretada com fundamento na pr?tica de um crime que admite pris?o preventiva, conclui-se pelo indeferimento do habeas corpus em apre?o, por falta de fundamento bastante ? art. 223.?, n.? 4, al. a), do CPP.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,33728,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-659295","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-gdmfr-a","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 203\/22.7GDMFR-A.S1 \u2013 2022-09-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 203\/22.7GDMFR-A.S1 \u2013 2022-09-08\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: CID GERALDO. I - Estando o arguido indiciado pela pr?tica de um crime de viol?ncia dom?stica agravado, p. e p. pelo art. 152.?, n.os l, al. b), 2, al. a), do CP, pun?vel com pena de pris?o de 2 a 5 anos, o prazo m?ximo de dura??o da medida de coac??o de pris?o preventiva, n?o ? de 4 meses, mas sim de 6 meses [art. 215.?, n.os l, al a) e 2, do CPP]. II - Encontrando-se o arguido sujeito ? medida de coac??o de pris?o preventiva, desde 25.4.2022 (despacho judicial de fls, 57 e ss.), tendo sido detido em 24-04-2022 (cfr. fls. 6), n?o se mostra excedido o prazo m?ximo de pris?o preventiva. III - Resultando claro que a pris?o do requerente n?o se mant?m para al?m do prazo fixado pela lei, e considerando que, nos presentes autos, a pris?o preventiva do arguido\/requerente foi ordenada por um juiz no ?mbito das suas atribui??es e com compet?ncia para ordenar a pris?o preventiva de arguido e que a pris?o preventiva foi decretada com fundamento na pr?tica de um crime que admite pris?o preventiva, conclui-se pelo indeferimento do habeas corpus em apre?o, por falta de fundamento bastante ? art. 223.?, n.? 4, al. a), do CPP.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 203\\\/22.7GDMFR-A.S1 \u2013 2022-09-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T11:06:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 203\\\/22.7GDMFR-A.S1 \u2013 2022-09-08\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 203\/22.7GDMFR-A.S1 \u2013 2022-09-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 203\/22.7GDMFR-A.S1 \u2013 2022-09-08","og_description":"Relator: CID GERALDO. I - Estando o arguido indiciado pela pr?tica de um crime de viol?ncia dom?stica agravado, p. e p. pelo art. 152.?, n.os l, al. b), 2, al. a), do CP, pun?vel com pena de pris?o de 2 a 5 anos, o prazo m?ximo de dura??o da medida de coac??o de pris?o preventiva, n?o ? de 4 meses, mas sim de 6 meses [art. 215.?, n.os l, al a) e 2, do CPP]. II - Encontrando-se o arguido sujeito ? medida de coac??o de pris?o preventiva, desde 25.4.2022 (despacho judicial de fls, 57 e ss.), tendo sido detido em 24-04-2022 (cfr. fls. 6), n?o se mostra excedido o prazo m?ximo de pris?o preventiva. III - Resultando claro que a pris?o do requerente n?o se mant?m para al?m do prazo fixado pela lei, e considerando que, nos presentes autos, a pris?o preventiva do arguido\/requerente foi ordenada por um juiz no ?mbito das suas atribui??es e com compet?ncia para ordenar a pris?o preventiva de arguido e que a pris?o preventiva foi decretada com fundamento na pr?tica de um crime que admite pris?o preventiva, conclui-se pelo indeferimento do habeas corpus em apre?o, por falta de fundamento bastante ? art. 223.?, n.? 4, al. a), do CPP.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 203\/22.7GDMFR-A.S1 \u2013 2022-09-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T11:06:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-203-22-7gdmfr-a-s1-2022-09-08\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 203\/22.7GDMFR-A.S1 \u2013 2022-09-08"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/659295","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=659295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=659295"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=659295"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=659295"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=659295"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=659295"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=659295"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=659295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}