{"id":659310,"date":"2026-04-23T13:09:36","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T11:09:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T13:09:36","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T11:09:36","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8891\/20.2T8LSB-A.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-07"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- A admissibilidade do recurso pressup?e que o recorrente tenha interesse em agir ou interesse processual. II- No ?mbito dos recursos, o interesse em agir encontra-se ligado ? utilidade efectiva na interven??o do tribunal superior, traduzido na possibilidade de a quest?o submetida ter uma repercuss?o favor?vel ao recorrente no processo em que o recurso foi interposto. Se o recorrente n?o alcan?a, com o recurso, qualquer efeito ?til, n?o tem interesse em agir. III- N?o tem interesse em agir o recorrente que, em face da decis?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de considerar improcedente a excep??o de prescri??o, apreciando-a em duas vertentes: i) — a interrup??o do prazo de prescri??o nos termos do artigo 323.?, n.? 2 do C?digo Civil e ii) — a suspens?o do prazo de prescri??o por aplica??o do disposto no artigo 7.?, n.? 3 da Lei n.? 1-A\/2020 de 19 de Mar?o, apenas p?e em causa esta segunda, verificando-se o tr?nsito em julgado quanto ?quela primeira quest?o.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- A admissibilidade do recurso pressup?e que o recorrente tenha interesse em agir ou interesse processual. II- No ?mbito dos recursos, o interesse em agir encontra-se ligado ? utilidade efectiva na interven??o do tribunal superior, traduzido na possibilidade de a quest?o submetida ter uma repercuss?o favor?vel ao recorrente no processo em que o recurso foi interposto. Se o recorrente n?o alcan?a, com o recurso, qualquer efeito ?til, n?o tem interesse em agir. III- N?o tem interesse em agir o recorrente que, em face da decis?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de considerar improcedente a excep??o de prescri??o, apreciando-a em duas vertentes: i) — a interrup??o do prazo de prescri??o nos termos do artigo 323.?, n.? 2 do C?digo Civil e ii) — a suspens?o do prazo de prescri??o por aplica??o do disposto no artigo 7.?, n.? 3 da Lei n.? 1-A\/2020 de 19 de Mar?o, apenas p?e em causa esta segunda, verificando-se o tr?nsito em julgado quanto ?quela primeira quest?o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7764],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,9495,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-659310","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-4-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-lsb-a","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8891\/20.2T8LSB-A.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8891\/20.2T8LSB-A.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-07\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- A admissibilidade do recurso pressup?e que o recorrente tenha interesse em agir ou interesse processual. II- No ?mbito dos recursos, o interesse em agir encontra-se ligado ? utilidade efectiva na interven??o do tribunal superior, traduzido na possibilidade de a quest?o submetida ter uma repercuss?o favor?vel ao recorrente no processo em que o recurso foi interposto. Se o recorrente n?o alcan?a, com o recurso, qualquer efeito ?til, n?o tem interesse em agir. III- N?o tem interesse em agir o recorrente que, em face da decis?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de considerar improcedente a excep??o de prescri??o, apreciando-a em duas vertentes: i) - a interrup??o do prazo de prescri??o nos termos do artigo 323.?, n.? 2 do C?digo Civil e ii) - a suspens?o do prazo de prescri??o por aplica??o do disposto no artigo 7.?, n.? 3 da Lei n.? 1-A\/2020 de 19 de Mar?o, apenas p?e em causa esta segunda, verificando-se o tr?nsito em julgado quanto ?quela primeira quest?o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8891\\\/20.2T8LSB-A.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T11:09:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8891\\\/20.2T8LSB-A.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-07\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8891\/20.2T8LSB-A.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8891\/20.2T8LSB-A.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-07","og_description":"Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- A admissibilidade do recurso pressup?e que o recorrente tenha interesse em agir ou interesse processual. II- No ?mbito dos recursos, o interesse em agir encontra-se ligado ? utilidade efectiva na interven??o do tribunal superior, traduzido na possibilidade de a quest?o submetida ter uma repercuss?o favor?vel ao recorrente no processo em que o recurso foi interposto. Se o recorrente n?o alcan?a, com o recurso, qualquer efeito ?til, n?o tem interesse em agir. III- N?o tem interesse em agir o recorrente que, em face da decis?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de considerar improcedente a excep??o de prescri??o, apreciando-a em duas vertentes: i) - a interrup??o do prazo de prescri??o nos termos do artigo 323.?, n.? 2 do C?digo Civil e ii) - a suspens?o do prazo de prescri??o por aplica??o do disposto no artigo 7.?, n.? 3 da Lei n.? 1-A\/2020 de 19 de Mar?o, apenas p?e em causa esta segunda, verificando-se o tr?nsito em julgado quanto ?quela primeira quest?o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8891\/20.2T8LSB-A.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-07 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T11:09:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-8891-20-2t8lsb-a-l1-s1-2022-09-07\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 8891\/20.2T8LSB-A.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-07"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/659310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=659310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=659310"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=659310"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=659310"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=659310"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=659310"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=659310"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=659310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}