{"id":659373,"date":"2026-04-23T13:16:20","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T11:16:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T13:16:20","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T11:16:20","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 492\/20.1PAMGR-C.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: TERESA DE ALMEIDA. I. Existindo condena??o, a anula??o do ac?rd?o n?o implica o regresso do processo ? fase anterior. A anula??o n?o significa que a condena??o deixe de ter existido, n?o equivalendo a nulidade a inexist?ncia. II. Embora n?o tenha transitado em julgado, foi proferida uma condena??o em 1? inst?ncia. III. A al?nea c) do n? 1 do art. 215.? do C.P.P. n?o se refere a senten?a definitiva (a esse momento processual refere-se a al?nea seguinte) nem cuida das vicissitudes por que eventualmente passe, depois de proferida pelo tribunal competente. Tem em vista apenas um determinado patamar do iter processual e esse foi alcan?ado.[1] IV. Tendo sido proferido ac?rd?o condenat?rio em 1.? inst?ncia, sujeito, embora a reenvio parcial para novo julgamento, o prazo de pris?o m?xima da pris?o preventiva n?o ? de 1 ano e 6 meses, previsto no art. 215.?, n.?s 1, al?nea c) e 2, do C?digo de Processo Penal, como vem invocado pelo peticionante, mas antes o de 2 anos, por refer?ncia ao art. 215.?, n.?s 1, al?nea d) e 2, do C?digo de Processo Penal. ____ [1] 03-02-2022, no processo1325\/19.7PFLRS-D.S1<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/f5cd8e2a6cccd378802588b70050a93d?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: TERESA DE ALMEIDA. I. Existindo condena??o, a anula??o do ac?rd?o n?o implica o regresso do processo ? fase anterior. A anula??o n?o significa que a condena??o deixe de ter existido, n?o equivalendo a nulidade a inexist?ncia. II. Embora n?o tenha transitado em julgado, foi proferida uma condena??o em 1? inst?ncia. III. A al?nea c) do n? 1 do art. 215.? do C.P.P. n?o se refere a senten?a definitiva (a esse momento processual refere-se a al?nea seguinte) nem cuida das vicissitudes por que eventualmente passe, depois de proferida pelo tribunal competente. Tem em vista apenas um determinado patamar do iter processual e esse foi alcan?ado.[1] IV. Tendo sido proferido ac?rd?o condenat?rio em 1.? inst?ncia, sujeito, embora a reenvio parcial para novo julgamento, o prazo de pris?o m?xima da pris?o preventiva n?o ? de 1 ano e 6 meses, previsto no art. 215.?, n.?s 1, al?nea c) e 2, do C?digo de Processo Penal, como vem invocado pelo peticionante, mas antes o de 2 anos, por refer?ncia ao art. 215.?, n.?s 1, al?nea d) e 2, do C?digo de Processo Penal. ____ [1] 03-02-2022, no processo1325\/19.7PFLRS-D.S1<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-659373","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 492\/20.1PAMGR-C.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 492\/20.1PAMGR-C.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: TERESA DE ALMEIDA. I. Existindo condena??o, a anula??o do ac?rd?o n?o implica o regresso do processo ? fase anterior. A anula??o n?o significa que a condena??o deixe de ter existido, n?o equivalendo a nulidade a inexist?ncia. II. Embora n?o tenha transitado em julgado, foi proferida uma condena??o em 1? inst?ncia. III. A al?nea c) do n? 1 do art. 215.? do C.P.P. n?o se refere a senten?a definitiva (a esse momento processual refere-se a al?nea seguinte) nem cuida das vicissitudes por que eventualmente passe, depois de proferida pelo tribunal competente. Tem em vista apenas um determinado patamar do iter processual e esse foi alcan?ado.[1] IV. Tendo sido proferido ac?rd?o condenat?rio em 1.? inst?ncia, sujeito, embora a reenvio parcial para novo julgamento, o prazo de pris?o m?xima da pris?o preventiva n?o ? de 1 ano e 6 meses, previsto no art. 215.?, n.?s 1, al?nea c) e 2, do C?digo de Processo Penal, como vem invocado pelo peticionante, mas antes o de 2 anos, por refer?ncia ao art. 215.?, n.?s 1, al?nea d) e 2, do C?digo de Processo Penal. ____ [1] 03-02-2022, no processo1325\/19.7PFLRS-D.S1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 492\\\/20.1PAMGR-C.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T11:16:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 492\\\/20.1PAMGR-C.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 492\/20.1PAMGR-C.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 492\/20.1PAMGR-C.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06","og_description":"Relator: TERESA DE ALMEIDA. I. Existindo condena??o, a anula??o do ac?rd?o n?o implica o regresso do processo ? fase anterior. A anula??o n?o significa que a condena??o deixe de ter existido, n?o equivalendo a nulidade a inexist?ncia. II. Embora n?o tenha transitado em julgado, foi proferida uma condena??o em 1? inst?ncia. III. A al?nea c) do n? 1 do art. 215.? do C.P.P. n?o se refere a senten?a definitiva (a esse momento processual refere-se a al?nea seguinte) nem cuida das vicissitudes por que eventualmente passe, depois de proferida pelo tribunal competente. Tem em vista apenas um determinado patamar do iter processual e esse foi alcan?ado.[1] IV. Tendo sido proferido ac?rd?o condenat?rio em 1.? inst?ncia, sujeito, embora a reenvio parcial para novo julgamento, o prazo de pris?o m?xima da pris?o preventiva n?o ? de 1 ano e 6 meses, previsto no art. 215.?, n.?s 1, al?nea c) e 2, do C?digo de Processo Penal, como vem invocado pelo peticionante, mas antes o de 2 anos, por refer?ncia ao art. 215.?, n.?s 1, al?nea d) e 2, do C?digo de Processo Penal. ____ [1] 03-02-2022, no processo1325\/19.7PFLRS-D.S1","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 492\/20.1PAMGR-C.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T11:16:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-492-20-1pamgr-c-s1-2022-09-06\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 492\/20.1PAMGR-C.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/659373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=659373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=659373"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=659373"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=659373"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=659373"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=659373"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=659373"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=659373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}