{"id":660134,"date":"2026-04-23T14:44:58","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T12:44:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T14:44:58","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T12:44:58","slug":"bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Bundesgerichtshof, 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2022-08-18, 2 StR 456\/21"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Tenor<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

1. Auf die Revision des Angeklagten P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Darmstadt vom 28. Juni 2021 wird<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

a) das Verfahren eingestellt, soweit der Angeklagte P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0in den F\u00e4llen 9 und 13 der Urteilsgr\u00fcnde jeweils wegen Computerbetrugs verurteilt worden ist; insoweit tr\u00e4gt die Staatskasse die Kosten des Verfahrens und die notwendigen Auslagen des Angeklagten;<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

b) das vorbezeichnete Urteil, soweit es ihn betrifft, aus den zutreffenden Gr\u00fcnden der Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

aa) im Schuldspruch dahingehend ge\u00e4ndert, dass der Angeklagte P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0des schweren Bandendiebstahls in elf F\u00e4llen, des Computerbetruges in f\u00fcnf F\u00e4llen, wobei es in einem Fall beim Versuch blieb, und des Fahrens ohne Fahrerlaubnis schuldig ist,<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

bb) im Ausspruch \u00fcber die Einzelstrafe in Fall 19 der Urteilsgr\u00fcnde dahingehend erg\u00e4nzt, dass die H\u00f6he des Tagessatzes auf einen Euro festgesetzt wird,<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

cc) im Einziehungsausspruch dahingehend ge\u00e4ndert, dass gegen den Angeklagten P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0als Gesamtschuldner die Einziehung des Wertes von Tatertr\u00e4gen in H\u00f6he von 9.804,93 \u20ac angeordnet wird.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

2. Die weitergehende Revision wird verworfen.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

3. Der Beschwerdef\u00fchrer hat die verbleibenden Kosten seines Rechtsmittels zu tragen (\u00a7 473 Abs. 4 StPO).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n\n\n\n
\n

Franke\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Appl\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Zeng\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Grube\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Schmidt\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Rechtsprechung im Internet (BMJV\/BfJ) : les decisions sont mises a disposition gratuitement en HTML, PDF et XML pour libre utilisation et re-utilisation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tenor 1. Auf die Revision des Angeklagten P. gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Darmstadt vom 28. Juni 2021 wird a) das Verfahren eingestellt, soweit der Angeklagte P. in den F\u00e4llen 9 und 13 der Urteilsgr\u00fcnde jeweils wegen Computerbetrugs verurteilt worden ist; insoweit tr\u00e4gt die Staatskasse die Kosten des Verfahrens und die notwendigen Auslagen des Angeklagten; b) das vorbezeichnete Urteil, soweit…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7802],"kji_court":[7803],"kji_chamber":[10030],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7808,7806,8712,7809],"kji_language":[7805],"class_list":["post-660134","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-allemagne","kji_court-bundesgerichtshof","kji_chamber-2-strafsenat","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-beschluss","kji_keyword-bundesgerichtshof","kji_keyword-strafsenat","kji_keyword-tenor","kji_language-allemand"],"yoast_head":"\nBundesgerichtshof, 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2022-08-18, 2 StR 456\/21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bundesgerichtshof, 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2022-08-18, 2 StR 456\/21\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tenor 1. Auf die Revision des Angeklagten P. gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Darmstadt vom 28. Juni 2021 wird a) das Verfahren eingestellt, soweit der Angeklagte P. in den F\u00e4llen 9 und 13 der Urteilsgr\u00fcnde jeweils wegen Computerbetrugs verurteilt worden ist; insoweit tr\u00e4gt die Staatskasse die Kosten des Verfahrens und die notwendigen Auslagen des Angeklagten; b) das vorbezeichnete Urteil, soweit...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\\\/\",\"name\":\"Bundesgerichtshof, 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2022-08-18, 2 StR 456\\\/21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T12:44:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Bundesgerichtshof, 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2022-08-18, 2 StR 456\\\/21\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bundesgerichtshof, 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2022-08-18, 2 StR 456\/21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bundesgerichtshof, 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2022-08-18, 2 StR 456\/21","og_description":"Tenor 1. Auf die Revision des Angeklagten P. gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Darmstadt vom 28. Juni 2021 wird a) das Verfahren eingestellt, soweit der Angeklagte P. in den F\u00e4llen 9 und 13 der Urteilsgr\u00fcnde jeweils wegen Computerbetrugs verurteilt worden ist; insoweit tr\u00e4gt die Staatskasse die Kosten des Verfahrens und die notwendigen Auslagen des Angeklagten; b) das vorbezeichnete Urteil, soweit...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/","name":"Bundesgerichtshof, 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2022-08-18, 2 StR 456\/21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T12:44:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-2-strafsenat-beschluss-2022-08-18-2-str-456-21-3\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Bundesgerichtshof, 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2022-08-18, 2 StR 456\/21"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/660134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=660134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=660134"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=660134"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=660134"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=660134"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=660134"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=660134"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=660134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}