{"id":662326,"date":"2026-04-23T19:06:43","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T17:06:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T19:06:43","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T17:06:43","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 17909\/17.5T8PRT-A.P2.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: VIEIRA E CUNHA. I ? N?o sendo caso de total inexist?ncia, s? em casos nos quais de todo em todo n?o se consiga vislumbrar qualquer conte?do ?til na alega??es e\/ou conclus?es se deve lan?ar m?o da rejei??o do recurso, cabendo no demais ao tribunal delimitar o ?mbito do recurso em fun??o do que, em face da decis?o recorrida e do conte?do da alega??o e suas conclus?es, ainda que deficientes, depreende serem as quest?es relevantes e sem embargo do respeito pelo contradit?rio. II ? Nos termos do n.? 1 do art.? 5.? CPCiv, as partes t?m de alegar os factos essenciais que constituem a causa de pedir. III — Factos essenciais s?o os factos constitutivos dos elementos t?picos do direito que se pretende fazer actuar em ju?zo, ou seja, os factos que permitem a substancia??o do pedido, independentemente de poderem ser indiciados por factos instrumentais de conhecimento oficioso, ou de serem complementados ou concretizados pelo que resulte da discuss?o da causa (n.?s 2 als. a) e b) do art.? 5.?). IV ? A simula??o dos sujeitos do neg?cio (interposi??o fict?cia) constitui uma modalidade da simula??o relativa, implicando o intuito de enganar terceiros, facto esse essencial para a caracteriza??o da causa de pedir.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: VIEIRA E CUNHA. I ? N?o sendo caso de total inexist?ncia, s? em casos nos quais de todo em todo n?o se consiga vislumbrar qualquer conte?do ?til na alega??es e\/ou conclus?es se deve lan?ar m?o da rejei??o do recurso, cabendo no demais ao tribunal delimitar o ?mbito do recurso em fun??o do que, em face da decis?o recorrida e do conte?do da alega??o e suas conclus?es, ainda que deficientes, depreende serem as quest?es relevantes e sem embargo do respeito pelo contradit?rio. II ? Nos termos do n.? 1 do art.? 5.? CPCiv, as partes t?m de alegar os factos essenciais que constituem a causa de pedir. III — Factos essenciais s?o os factos constitutivos dos elementos t?picos do direito que se pretende fazer actuar em ju?zo, ou seja, os factos que permitem a substancia??o do pedido, independentemente de poderem ser indiciados por factos instrumentais de conhecimento oficioso, ou de serem complementados ou concretizados pelo que resulte da discuss?o da causa (n.?s 2 als. a) e b) do art.? 5.?). IV ? A simula??o dos sujeitos do neg?cio (interposi??o fict?cia) constitui uma modalidade da simula??o relativa, implicando o intuito de enganar terceiros, facto esse essencial para a caracteriza??o da causa de pedir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8784],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-662326","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-2-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 17909\/17.5T8PRT-A.P2.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 17909\/17.5T8PRT-A.P2.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: VIEIRA E CUNHA. I ? N?o sendo caso de total inexist?ncia, s? em casos nos quais de todo em todo n?o se consiga vislumbrar qualquer conte?do ?til na alega??es e\/ou conclus?es se deve lan?ar m?o da rejei??o do recurso, cabendo no demais ao tribunal delimitar o ?mbito do recurso em fun??o do que, em face da decis?o recorrida e do conte?do da alega??o e suas conclus?es, ainda que deficientes, depreende serem as quest?es relevantes e sem embargo do respeito pelo contradit?rio. II ? Nos termos do n.? 1 do art.? 5.? CPCiv, as partes t?m de alegar os factos essenciais que constituem a causa de pedir. III - Factos essenciais s?o os factos constitutivos dos elementos t?picos do direito que se pretende fazer actuar em ju?zo, ou seja, os factos que permitem a substancia??o do pedido, independentemente de poderem ser indiciados por factos instrumentais de conhecimento oficioso, ou de serem complementados ou concretizados pelo que resulte da discuss?o da causa (n.?s 2 als. a) e b) do art.? 5.?). IV ? A simula??o dos sujeitos do neg?cio (interposi??o fict?cia) constitui uma modalidade da simula??o relativa, implicando o intuito de enganar terceiros, facto esse essencial para a caracteriza??o da causa de pedir.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 17909\\\/17.5T8PRT-A.P2.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T17:06:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 17909\\\/17.5T8PRT-A.P2.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 17909\/17.5T8PRT-A.P2.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 17909\/17.5T8PRT-A.P2.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13","og_description":"Relator: VIEIRA E CUNHA. I ? N?o sendo caso de total inexist?ncia, s? em casos nos quais de todo em todo n?o se consiga vislumbrar qualquer conte?do ?til na alega??es e\/ou conclus?es se deve lan?ar m?o da rejei??o do recurso, cabendo no demais ao tribunal delimitar o ?mbito do recurso em fun??o do que, em face da decis?o recorrida e do conte?do da alega??o e suas conclus?es, ainda que deficientes, depreende serem as quest?es relevantes e sem embargo do respeito pelo contradit?rio. II ? Nos termos do n.? 1 do art.? 5.? CPCiv, as partes t?m de alegar os factos essenciais que constituem a causa de pedir. III - Factos essenciais s?o os factos constitutivos dos elementos t?picos do direito que se pretende fazer actuar em ju?zo, ou seja, os factos que permitem a substancia??o do pedido, independentemente de poderem ser indiciados por factos instrumentais de conhecimento oficioso, ou de serem complementados ou concretizados pelo que resulte da discuss?o da causa (n.?s 2 als. a) e b) do art.? 5.?). IV ? A simula??o dos sujeitos do neg?cio (interposi??o fict?cia) constitui uma modalidade da simula??o relativa, implicando o intuito de enganar terceiros, facto esse essencial para a caracteriza??o da causa de pedir.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 17909\/17.5T8PRT-A.P2.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T17:06:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-17909-17-5t8prt-a-p2-s1-2022-07-13\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 17909\/17.5T8PRT-A.P2.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/662326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=662326"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=662326"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=662326"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=662326"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=662326"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=662326"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=662326"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=662326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}